economypromЭкономика промышленности / Russian Journal of Industrial EconomicsRussian Journal of Industrial Economics2072-16332413-662XMISIS10.17073/2072-1633-2022-4-473-487economyprom-1116Research ArticleЭкономика природопользованияEnvironmental economicsСеквестрация и использование углекислого газа: сущность технологий и подходы к классификации проектовSequestration and use of carbon dioxide: the essence of technology and approaches to the classification of the projectshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5168-0518ЧереповицынаА. А.CherepovitsynaA. A.

Череповицына Алина Александровна – канд. экон. наук, доцент, заведующий Лабораторией управления устойчивым развитием промышленных и природных систем, старший научный сотрудник; главный научный сотрудник отдела промышленной экологии

184209, Мурманская обл., Апатиты, ул. Ферсмана, д. 24а

141006, Московская обл., Мытищи, Олимпийский просп., д. 42

Alina A. Cherepovitsyna – PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory for Management of the Sustainable Development of Industrial and Natural Systems, Senior researcher; Chief Researcher of the Industrial Ecology Department

24a Fersmana Str, Apatity, Murmansk region, 184209

42, Olympiyskiy Ave., Mytishchi, Moscow region, 141006

iljinovaAA@mail.ruДорожкинаИ. П.DorozhkinaI. P.

Дорожкина Ирина Петровна – стажер-исследователь, Лаборатория управления устойчивым развитием промышленных и природных систем

184209, Мурманская обл., Апатиты, ул. Ферсмана, д. 24а

Irina P. Dorozhkina – Trainee Researcher, Laboratory for Management of the Sustainable Development of Industrial and Natural Systems, senior researcher

24a Fersmana Str, Apatity, Murmansk region, 184209

irinadorozhkina.99@gmail.comКостылеваВ. М.KostylevaV. N.

Костылева Вера Михайловна – начальник отдела химической и нефтехимической промышленности

141006, Московская обл., Мытищи, Олимпийский просп., д. 42

Vera N. Kostyleva – Head of the Department of Chemical and Oil and Chemical Industry, Industrial Ecology Department

42, Olympiyskiy Ave., Mytishchi, Moscow region, 141006

v.kostyleva@eipc.centerИнститут экономических проблем им. Г.П. Лузина Кольского научного центра РАН; Научно-исследовательский институт «Центр экологической промышленной политики»РоссияLuzin Institute for Economic Studies – Subdivision of the Federal Research Centre “Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences”; Research Institute “Center for Environmental Industrial Policy”Russian FederationИнститут экономических проблем им. Г.П. Лузина Кольского научного центра РАНРоссияLuzin Institute for Economic Studies – Subdivision of the Federal Research Centre “Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences”Russian FederationНаучно-исследовательский институт «Центр экологической промышленной политики»РоссияResearch Institute “Center for Environmental Industrial Policy”Russian Federation202202012023154473487Copyright © Череповицына А.А., Дорожкина И.П., Костылева В.М., 20232023Череповицына А.А., Дорожкина И.П., Костылева В.М.Cherepovitsyna A.A., Dorozhkina I.P., Kostyleva V.N.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/view/1116

Увеличение массы выбросов углекислого газа в настоящее время рассматривается как основной фактор усиления парникового эффекта, приводящего, по мнению ряда ученых, к глобальному потеплению. Данная проблема стала предпосылкой для развития и внедрения разных опций декарбонизации, в том числе, технологий секвестрации (улавливание и хранение) и использования СО2 (технологии CC(U)S – carbon capture, utilization and storage). Технологии направлены на сокращение выбросов углекислого газа путем его улавливания на промышленных объектах (реже – из атмосферы) и могут рассматриваться как комплементарные и критически необходимые для движения к углеродной нейтральности, так как позволяют избежать радикальных изменений в энергетических и промышленных процессах. Исследование направлено на изучение мирового опыта и сущности инициатив CC(U)S с целью разработки комплексной классификации проектов секвестрации и использования CO2 для систематизации существующих знаний и практических аспектов по теме. Авторами предложен вариант комплексной классификации проектов с группировкой признаков по базовым, технологическим и организационно-экономическим характеристикам и выделением разных видов проектов по предложенным признакам. Для апробации разработанной классификации представлен классификационный профиль по действующим проектам CC(U)S, реализуемым в США, Великобритании и Китае. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы для планирования деятельности в области развития технологий секвестрации и использования CO2 в России, принятия решений по этим инициативам, в том числе касаемо финансирования и поддержки таких проектов на государственном уровне.

Currently, increasing the mass of carbon dioxide emissions is regarded as the main factor of increasing the greenhouse effect that is considered by the scientists to be the cause of the global warming. The problem has stimulated the development and implementation of various options of decarbonization including the sequestration technology (CCS – capture and storage) and carbon dioxide utilization (CC(U)S technology – carbon capture, utilization and storage). The technologies are aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions by capturing the gas at the industrial premises (rarely from the atmosphere) and can be regarded as complementary and crucially essential for achieving carbon neutrality as they allow avoiding radical transformations of energy and industrial processes. The study is directed towards analyzing the world experience and the essence of CC(U)S initiatives to develop complex classification of sequestration projects and use of CO2 to systematize the existing knowledge and practical aspects on the subject. The authors suggest a variant of complex classification of the projects that involves grouping the features by basic, technological and organizational and economic characteristics and identifying different types of projects according to the suggested features. In order to test the classification the authors introduce a classification profile on the existing CC(U)S projects implemented in the USA, the UK and China. The findings can be used for planning the activities in the area of development of sequestration and carbon dioxide utilization technologies in Russia, for making decisions on these initiatives including those regarding financing and support of such projects at the government level.

экономика природопользованияуглекислый газсеквестрацияиспользованиемировой опытклассификациятехнологии секвестрациитехнологии CC(U)Sдекарбонизацияeconomics of environmental managementcarbon dioxidesequestrationutilizationworld experienceclassificationsequestration technologiesCC(U)S technologiesdecarbonizationReferencesДоброхотова М.В., Матушанский А.В. Применение концепции наилучших доступных технологий в целях технологической трансформации промышленности в условиях энергетического перехода. Экономика устойчивого развития. 2022;(2(50)):63–68.Dobrokhotova M.V., Matushanskii A.V. Applying the best available techniques conceptfor the technological transformation of industry under the energy transition conditions. Economics of Sustainable Development. 2022;(2(50)):63–68. (In Russ.)IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Metz B., Davidson O., de Coninck H., Loos M., Meyer L., eds. 2005. URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/srccs_wholereport-1.pdf (дата обращения: 05.09.2022).Metz B., Davidson O., de Coninck H., Loos M., Meyer L., eds. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. 2005. URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/srccs_wholereport-1.pdf (accessed on 05.09.2022).Рамочная конвенция Организации Объединенных Наций об изменении климата. 1992. URL: https://goo.su/hdO5kz (дата обращения: 19.06.2022).United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1992. (In Russ.). URL: https://goo.su/hdO5kz (accessed on 19.06.2022).Киотский протокол к рамочной конвенции Организации Объединенных Наций об изменении климата. 1998. URL: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kprus.pdf (дата обращения: 19.06.2022).Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1998. (In Russ.). URL: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kprus.pdf (accessed on 19.06.2022).Парижское соглашение. Организация Объединенных Наций. 2015. URL: https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_russian_.pdf (дата обращения:19.06.2022).The Paris Agreement. The United Nations. 2015. (In Russ.). URL: https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_ nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_russian_. pdf (accessed on 19.06.2022).IEA. Net zero by 2050. A roadmap for the global energy sector. Paris. May, 2021. URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (дата обращения: 11.09.2022).IEA. Net zero by 2050. A roadmap for the global energy sector. Paris. May, 2021. URL: https://www.iea. org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (accessed on 11.09.2022).Global CCS Institute. Global status of CCS 2021. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021-Global-Status-of-CCS-Report_Global_CCS_Institute.pdf (дата обращения: 24.06.2022).Global CCS Institute. Global status of CCS 2021. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/ uploads/2021/10/2021-Global-Status-of-CCS-Report_ Global_CCS_Institute.pdf (accessed on 24.06.2022).IEA. About CCUS. Technology report. Paris. April, 2021. URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/about-ccus (дата обращения: 06.07.2022).IEA. About CCUS. Technology report. Paris. April, 2021. URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/about-ccus (accessed on 06.07.2022).Carbon capture utilization and storage. Towards net-zero. The Kearney Energy Transition Institute. 2021 URL: https://www.kearney.com/documents/17779499/17781864/CCUS-2021+FactBook.pdf (дата обращения: 15.07.2022).Carbon capture utilization and storage. Towards net-zero. The Kearney Energy Transition Institute. 2021 URL: https://www.kearney.com/documents/17779499/17781864/CCUS-2021+FactBook.pdf (accessed on 15.07.2022).Facilities Database. Global CCS Institute. URL: https://co2re.co/FacilityData (дата обращения: 29.06.2022).Facilities Database. Global CCS Institute. URL: https://co2re.co/FacilityData (accessed on 29.06.2022).Стратегия социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации с низким уровнем выбросов парниковых газов до 2050 года (утв. распоряжением Правительства РФ от 29 октября 2021 г. № 3052-Р). URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/ADKkCzp3fWO32e2yA0BhtIpyzWfHaiUa.pdf (дата обращения: 10.10.2022).Strategy for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation with a low level of greenhouse gas emissions until 2050 (approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2021 No. 3052-R). (In Russ.). URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/ADKkCzp3fWO32e2yA0BhtIpyzWfHaiUa.pdf (accessed on 10.10.2022).Сидорова К.И. Разработка технико-экономической модели улавливания СО2 для энергетического сектора. Экология и промышленность России. 2014;(12):20–25. URL: https://www.ecology-kalvis.ru/jour/article/view/557?locale=ru_RU (дата обращения: 10.10.2022).Sidorova K.I. The development of technical and economic model of CO2 capture for power-generating sector. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2014;(12):20–25. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.ecology-kalvis.ru/jour/article/view/557?locale=ru_RU (accessed on 10.10.2022).ПАО НК «Роснефть». Пресс-релизы. URL: https://www.rosneft.ru/press/releases/item/204425/ (дата обращения: 18.10.2022).Rosneft. Press Releases. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.rosneft.ru/press/releases/item/204425/ (accessed on 18.10.2022).IEA. Levelised cost of CO2 capture by sector and initial CO2 concentration, 2019. In: CCUS in clean energy transitions. 26 October 2022. Paris. URL: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/levelised-cost-of-co2-capture-by-sector-and-initial-co2-concentration-2019 (дата обращения: 27.11.2022).IEA. Levelised cost of CO2 capture by sector and initial CO2 concentration, 2019. CCUS in clean energy transitions. Is carbon capture too expensive? October 26, 2022. Paris. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/levelised-cost-of-co2-capture-by-sector-and-initial-co2-concentration-2019 (accessed on 27.11.2022).Vygon Consulting. CCUS: монетизация выбросов СО2. URL: https://vygon.consulting/upload/iblock/967/jzgys72b7ome167wi4dbao9fnsqsfj13/vygon_consulting_CCUS.pdf (дата обращения: 17.09.2022).Vygon Consulting CCUS: Monetization of CO2 emissions. (In Russ.). URL: https://vygon.consulting/upload/iblock/967/jzgys72b7ome167wi4dbao9fnsqsfj13/vygon_consulting_CCUS.pdf (accessed on 17.09.2022).Hafez A., Fateen S.-E.K. CO2 transport and storage technologies. In: Carbon dioxide capture: processes, technology and environmental implications. Nova Publ.; 2016. P. 257–276. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304251602_CO2_Transport_and_Storage_Technologies (дата обращения: 14.05.2022).Hafez A., Fateen S.-E.K. CO2 transport and storage technologies. In: Carbon dioxide capture: processes, technology and environmental implications. Nova Publ.; 2016. P. 257–276. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304251602_CO2_Transport_and_Storage_Technologies (accessed on 14.05.2022).Gür T. M. Carbon dioxide emissions, capture, storage and utilization: Review of materials, processes and technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2022;89(117074):100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100965Gür T.M. Carbon dioxide emissions, capture, storage and utilization: Review of materials, processes and technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2022;89(117074):100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100965Mohammad M., Isaifan R., Weldu Y.W., Rahman M.A., Al-Ghamdiet S.G. Progress on carbon dioxide capture, storage and utilization. International Journal of Global Warming. 2020;20(2):124–144. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2020.105386Mohammad M., Isaifan R., Weldu Y.W., Rahman M.A., Al-Ghamdiet S.G. Progress on carbon dioxide capture, storage and utilization. International Journal of Global Warming. 2020;20(2):124–144. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2020.105386Vaz S., Rodrigues de Souza A.P., Lobo Baeta B.E. Technologies for carbon dioxide capture: A review applied to energy sectors. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2022;8:100456–100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100456Vaz S., Rodrigues de Souza A.P., Lobo Baeta B.E. Technologies for carbon dioxide capture: A review applied to energy sectors. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2022;8:100456–100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100456Ilinova A., Romasheva N., Cherepovitsyn A. CC(U)S initiatives: public effects and “Combined Value” Performance. Resources. 2021;10(6):61–81. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10060061Ilinova A., Romasheva N., Cherepovitsyn A. CC(U)S initiatives: public effects and “Combined Value” Performance. Resources. 2021;10(6):61–81. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10060061Karayannis V., Charalampides G., Lakioti E. Socio-economic aspects of CCS technologies. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014;14:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00716-3Karayannis V., Charalampides G., Lakioti E. Socio-economic aspects of CCS technologies. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014;14:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00716-3Tcvetkov P., Cherepovitsyn A., Fedoseev S. The changing role of CO2 in the transition to a circular economy: Review of carbon sequestration projects. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):5834–5853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205834Tcvetkov P., Cherepovitsyn A., Fedoseev S. The changing role of CO2 in the transition to a circular economy: Review of carbon sequestration projects. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):5834–5853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205834Kearns D., Liu H., Consoli С. Technology readiness and costs of CCS. March 2021. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CCS-Tech-and-Costs.pdf (дата обращения: 20.09.2022).Kearns D., Liu H., Consoli С. Technology readiness and costs of CCS. March 2021. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CCS-Tech-and-Costs.pdf (accessed on 20.09.2022).Global CCS Institute: Special report. Understanding industrial CCS hubs and clusters. 2016. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Understanding-Industrial-CCS-hubs-and-clusters.pdf (дата обращения: 08.10.2022).Global CCS Institute: Special report. Understanding industrial CCS hubs and clusters. 2016. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Understanding-Industrial-CCS-hubs-and-clusters.pdf (accessed on 08.10.2022).Shi Y., Jia Y., Pan W., Huang L., Yan J., Zheng R. Potential evaluation on CO2-EGR in tight and low-permeability reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry B. 2017;4(4):311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2017.08.013Shi Y., Jia Y., Pan W., Huang L., Yan J., Zheng R. Potential evaluation on CO2-EGR in tight and low-permeability reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry B. 2017;4(4):311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2017.08.013Global CCS Institute. Bioenergy and carbon capture and storage. 2019 Perspective. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/BECCS-Perspective_FINAL_18-March.pdf (дата обращения: 24.06.2022).Global CCS Institute. Bioenergy and carbon capture and storage. 2019 Perspective. URL: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/BECCS-Perspective_FINAL_18-March.pdf (accessed on 24.06.2022).Koytsoumpa E.I., Bergins C., Kakaras E. The CO2 economy: Review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2018;132:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029Koytsoumpa E.I., Bergins C., Kakaras E. The CO2 economy: Review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2018;132:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029Zhi-wu Liang Zh., Rongwong W., Liu H., Fu K., Gao H., Cao F., Zhang R., Sema T., Henni A., Sumon K.Z., Nath D., don Gelowitz, Srisang W., Saiwan Ch., Benamor A., Al-Marri M.J., Shi H., Supap T., Chan Ch., Zhou Q., Abu Zahra M., Wilson M., Olson W., Idem R., Tontiwachwuthikul P. Recent progress and new developments in post-combustion carbon-capture technology with amine based solvents. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2015;40:26–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2015.06.017Zhi-wu Liang Zh., Rongwong W., Liu H., Fu K., Gao H., Cao F., Zhang R., Sema T., Henni A., Sumon K.Z., Nath D., don Gelowitz, Srisang W., Saiwan Ch., Benamor A., Al-Marri M.J., Shi H., Supap T., Chan Ch., Zhou Q., Abu Zahra M., Wilson M., Olson W., Idem R., Tontiwachwuthikul P. Recent progress and new developments in post-combustion carbon-capture technology with amine based solvents. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2015;40:26–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2015.06.017ZEP: The costs of CO2 capture, transport and storage. Post-demonstration CCS in the EU. URL: https://zeroemissionsplatform.eu/wp-content/uploads/Overall-CO2-Costs-Report.pdf (дата обращения: 11.10.2022).ZEP: The costs of CO2 capture, transport and storage. Post-demonstration CCS in the EU. URL: https://zeroemissionsplatform.eu/wp-content/uploads/Overall-CO2-Costs-Report.pdf (accessed on 11.10.2022).The Acorn project. URL: https://theacornproject.uk/about/ (дата обращения: 07.07.2022).The Acorn project. URL: https://theacornproject.uk/about/ (accessed on 07.07.2022).Peck W.D., Ayash S.C., Klapperich R., Gorecki Ch.D. The North Dakota integrated carbon storage complex feasibility study. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2019;84:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.03.001Peck W.D., Ayash S.C., Klapperich R., Gorecki Ch.D. The North Dakota integrated carbon storage complex feasibility study. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2019;84:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.03.001Zhang T., Lin Q., Xue Zh., Munson R., Magneschi G. Sinopec Zhongyuan oil field company refinery CCS-EOR project. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:5869–5873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1724Zhang T., Lin Q., Xue Zh., Munson R., Magneschi G. Sinopec Zhongyuan oil field company refinery CCS-EOR project. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:5869–5873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1724

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.