economypromЭкономика промышленности / Russian Journal of Industrial EconomicsRussian Journal of Industrial Economics2072-16332413-662XMISIS10.17073/2072-1633-2019-4-405-415economyprom-800Research ArticleЭкономика знанийKnowledge economyМонополии и совершенная конкуренция в общем уравнении модели роста Солоу–УзавыMonopolies and perfect competition in Solow–Uzawa’s general equilibrium growth modelhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3012-304XЧжанВей-БинZhangWei-Bin

Вей-Бин Чжан – PhD, профессор

Префектура Оита, Беппу, ул. Джумонджибару, д. 1

Wei-Bin Zhang – PhD

1-1 Jumonjibaru, Beppu, Oita 874-8577

wbz1@apu.ac.jpАзиатско-Тихоокеанский университет РицумейканЯпонияRitsumeikan Asia Pacific UniversityJapan201902012020124405415Copyright © Чжан В., 20202020Чжан В.Zhang W.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/view/800

В статье исследовано интегрирование монополий в неоклассическую теорию роста. Автор пытается сделать неоклассическую теорию экономического роста более реалистичной, сопоставив сложности экономического роста и развития с различными типами рыночных структур. Исследование основано на нескольких, хорошо зарекомендовавших себя в литературе, экономических теориях. Создана модель на основе двухсекторной модели роста Солоу–Узавы. Моделирование монополии основано на теории монополии, хорошо обоснованной в экономической литературе. Показано наиболее вероятное поведение домохозяйства с помощью концепции рас- полагаемого дохода и функции полезности Чжана. Модель определяет прибыль монополий на внутреннем рынке, которая равномерно распределяется среди населения. Смоделировано существование точки равновесия, про- веден сравнительный статический анализ по некоторым параметрам.

The purpose of this study is to introduce monopolies to neoclassical growth theory. This unique contribution attempts to make neoclassical economic growth theory more realistic in modelling the complexity of economic growth and development with different types of market structures. This study is based on a few well-established economic theories in the literature of economics. We frame the model on basis of the Solow–Uzawa two-sector growth model. The modelling of monopoly is based on well-developed monopoly theory. We model behavior of the household with Zhang’s concept of disposable income and utility function. The model endogenously determines profits of monopolies which are equally distributed among the homogeneous population. We build the model and then identify the existence of an equilibrium point by simulation. We conduct comparative static analyses in some parameters.

монополиясовершенная конкуренциянакопление капиталамодель Солоумодель Узавыприбыльmonopolyperfect competitioncapital accumulationSolow modelUzawa modelprofitReferencesNikaido H. Monopolistic Competition and Effective Demand. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1975.Nikaido H. Monopolistic Competition and Effective Demand. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1975.Mas-Colell A., Whinston M.D., Green J.R. Microeconomic Theory. New-York: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Mas-Colell A., Whinston M.D., Green J.R. Microeconomic Theory. New-York: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Brakman S., Heijdra B.J. The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 495 p.Brakman S., Heijdra B.J. The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 495 p.Wang W.W. Monopolistic Competition and Product Diversity: Review and Extension. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2012. Vol. 26. No. 5. Pp. 879–910. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1736712Wang W.W. Monopolistic Competition and Product Diversity: Review and Extension. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2012. Vol. 26. No. 5. Pp. 879–910. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1736712Behrens K., Murata Y. General Equilibrium Models of Monopolistic Competition: A New Approach. Journal of Economic Theory. 2007. Vol. 136. No. 1. Pp. 776–787. DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2006.10.001Behrens K., Murata Y. General Equilibrium Models of Monopolistic Competition: A New Approach. Journal of Economic Theory. 2007. Vol. 136. No. 1. Pp. 776–787. DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2006.10.001Behrens K., Murata Y. City Size and the Henry George Theorem under Monopolistic Competition. Journal of Urban Economics. 2009. Vol. 65. No. 2. Pp. 228–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.004Behrens K., Murata Y. City Size and the Henry George Theorem under Monopolistic Competition. Journal of Urban Economics. 2009. Vol. 65. No. 2. Pp. 228–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.004Parenti M., Ushchev P., Thisse J.F. Toward a Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Journal of Economic Theory. 2017. Vol. 167. Pp. 86–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2016.10.005Parenti M., Ushchev P., Thisse J.F. Toward a Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Journal of Economic Theory. 2017. Vol. 167. Pp. 86–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2016.10.005Zhang W.B. Economic Growth Theory. London: Ashgate, 2005. 482 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781351159449Zhang W.B. Economic Growth Theory. London: Ashgate, 2005. 482 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781351159449Zhang W.B. Woman’s Labor Participation and Economic Growth – Creativity, Knowledge Utilization and Family Preference. Economics Letters. 1993. Vol. 42. Pp. 105–110.Zhang W.B. Woman’s Labor Participation and Economic Growth – Creativity, Knowledge Utilization and Family Preference. Economics Letters. 1993. Vol. 42. Pp. 105–110.Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly. Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70. Pp. 65–94. DOI: 10.2307/1884513Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly. Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70. Pp. 65–94. DOI: 10.2307/1884513Uzawa H. On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies. 1961. Vol. 29. Pp. 47–70. DOI: 10.2307/2296180Uzawa H. On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies. 1961. Vol. 29. Pp. 47–70. DOI: 10.2307/2296180Burmeister E., Dobell A.R. Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1970Burmeister E., Dobell A.R. Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1970Azariadis C . Intertemporal Macroeconomics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Company, 1993. 528 p.Azariadis C . Intertemporal Macroeconomics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Company, 1993. 528 p.Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1995. 539 p.Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1995. 539 p.Jensen B.S., Larsen M.E. General Equilibrium Dynamics of Multi-Sector Growth Models. Journal of Economics. 2005. Vol. 86. No. 1. Pp. 17–56.Jensen B.S., Larsen M.E. General Equilibrium Dynamics of Multi-Sector Growth Models. Journal of Economics. 2005. Vol. 86. No. 1. Pp. 17–56.Ben-David D., Loewy M.B. Trade and Neoclassical Growth Model. Journal of Economic Integration. 2003. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 1–16.Ben-David D., Loewy M.B. Trade and Neoclassical Growth Model. Journal of Economic Integration. 2003. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 1–16.Zhang W.B. International Trade Theory: Capital, Knowledge, Economic Structure, Money and Prices over Time and Space. Berlin: Springer, 2008.Zhang W.B. International Trade Theory: Capital, Knowledge, Economic Structure, Money and Prices over Time and Space. Berlin: Springer, 2008.Dixit A., Stiglitz J.E. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. The American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67. No. 3. Pp. 297–308.Dixit A., Stiglitz J.E. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. The American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67. No. 3. Pp. 297–308.Krugman P.R. A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income. Journal of Political Economy. 1979. Vol. 87. No. 2. Pp. 253–266.Krugman P.R. A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income. Journal of Political Economy. 1979. Vol. 87. No. 2. Pp. 253–266.Romer P.M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98. No. 2. Pp. 71–102. DOI: 10.1086/261725Romer P.M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98. No. 2. Pp. 71–102. DOI: 10.1086/261725Benassy J.P. Taste for Variety and Optimum Production Patterns in Monopolistic Competition. Economics Letters. 1996. Vol. 52. No. 1. Pp. 41–47. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(96)00834-8Benassy J.P. Taste for Variety and Optimum Production Patterns in Monopolistic Competition. Economics Letters. 1996. Vol. 52. No. 1. Pp. 41–47. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(96)00834-8Nocco A., Ottaviano L.P., Salto M. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Selection: Why and How Heterogeneity Matters. Research in Economics. 2017. Vol. 71. Pp. 704–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2017.07.003Nocco A., Ottaviano L.P., Salto M. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Selection: Why and How Heterogeneity Matters. Research in Economics. 2017. Vol. 71. Pp. 704–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2017.07.003Zhang W.B. An Integration of Solow’s Growth and Dixit-Stiglitz’s Monopolistic Competition Models. SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business. 2018. Vol. 68. No. 4. Pp. 3–19. URL: https://spoudai.unipi.gr/index.php/spoudai/article/view/2684Zhang W.B. An Integration of Solow’s Growth and Dixit-Stiglitz’s Monopolistic Competition Models. SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business. 2018. Vol. 68. No. 4. Pp. 3–19. URL: https://spoudai.unipi.gr/index.php/spoudai/article/view/2684

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.