Preview

Russian Journal of Industrial Economics

Advanced search

Strategic priorities of support of import substitution in industry

https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-2-166-175

EDN: YPUCVI

Abstract

Introduction of sanctions restrictions by western countries stressed the need for developing the national industrial complex and creating the country’s own technological solutions. Over the past few years within the framework of the interaction of the state, industry and science various technological solutions have been created to be successfully implemented in production (an aircraft engine, a gas turbine power plant, mobile offshore seismic exploration complexes, a deep-sea drilling rig, a dispersant for oil spill response, pressure sensors for the Prirazlomnaya platform, etc.). The results achieved demonstrate the ability of the Russian industrial complex to create effective and safe equipment. However, in spite of the technologies created, the Russian economics has not achieved the target state of import independence. The analysis of the structure of the product import shows the dependence of the Russian economics on the import of foreign cars and equipment, chemical products and food raw materials. To achieve import independence it is essential to continue system work aimed at providing government support of domestic companies. The authors formulate the government support measures aimed at achieving technological independence: reduction of the key rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, development of transport infrastructure, creation of industrial clusters and subsidizing the costs on the implementation of digital tools. Realization of the measures suggested together with the existing tools will make it possible to ensure harmonic development of the national industry and gain the national technological sovereignty.

About the Authors

A. A. Spiridonov
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Spiridonov – Postgraduate Student

29 Polytechnicheskaya Str., St. Petersburg 195251



M. L. Fadeeva
National University of Science and Technology MISIS
Russian Federation

Marina L. Fadeeva – Postgraduate Student

4-1 Leninskiy Ave., Moscow 119049



T. O. Tolstykh
National University of Science and Technology MISIS
Russian Federation

Tatyana О. Tolstykh – Dr.Sci. (Econ.), Professor

4-1 Leninskiy Ave., Moscow 119049



References

1. Kvint V.L., Novikova I.V., Alimuradov M.K., Sasaev N.I. Strategizing the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(9):57-67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67

2. Агарков С.А., Богоявленский В.И., Козьменко С.Ю., Маслобоев В.А., Ульченко М.В. (ред.) Глобальные тенденции освоения энергетических ресурсов российской Арктики. В 2 ч. Ч. 1. Тенденции экономического развития российской Арктики. Апатиты: Кольский научный центр РАН; 2019. 170 с. https://doi.org/10.25702/KSC.978.5.91137.397.9-1

3. Topoleva T.N. Localization of the production: international experience and imperatives of Russia in the conditions of sanctions regime. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences. 2022;12(2):6–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2022-12-2-6-20

4. Inozemtsev A.A. The PD-14 engine is promising future of the Russian aviation industry. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2013;12(182):77–80. (In Russ.)

5. Greshnyakov M.I., Utyamishev P.A. The main lines of equipment and technology development for emergency rescue support of offshore fields. Gazovaya promyshlennost’ = Gas Industry Journal. 2022;(S1(829)):58–64. (In Russ.)

6. Kvint V.L., Khvorostyanaya A.S., Sasaev N.I. Advanced technologies in strategizing. Economics and Management. 2020;26(11):1170-1179. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-11-1170-1179

7. Kazanin A.G., Bazilevich S.O., Kuoma D.G., Zibo-rov A.V., Dolotkazin I.N., Koshelev E.A., Erofeev Yu.G., Agafonov V.M., Gladilin A.V., Petrov B.E. Innovative digital seismic complex of marine seismic exploration “Crab”. Development, implementation and development prospects of domestic bottom stations. Neft’. Gaz. Novatsii. 2021;(12(253)):28–35. (In Russ.)

8. Kvint V.L., Babkin A.V., Shkarupeta E.V. Strategizing of forming a platform operating model to increase the level of digital maturity of industrial systems. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2022;15(3):249-261. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-3-249-261

9. Shkadun O.V., Chekanskiy A.V., Cherepanov V.V., Nikonov E.O., Kozhukhov D.V., Ivanov N.A., Shevchenko V.V., Doronin S.I., Khombak V.V., Kuli-kov S.N. Practical experience in implementing a pilot well drilling project as a part of engineering surveys in the arctic offshore regions. Neft’. Gaz. Novatsii. 2022;(4(257)):8–11. (In Russ.)

10. Romasheva N., Dmitrieva D. Energy resources exploitation in the Russian Arctic: Challenges and prospects for the sustainable development of the ecosystem. Energies. 2021;14(24):8300. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248300

11. Sycheva K.G. Support for digitalization of Russian import substitution in the context of sanctions policy. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2022;(3):142–159. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202238

12. Fadeev A.M. Energy projects in the arctic: strategic priorities of technological independence. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2022;2(1(3)):88–105. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2022-2-1-88-105

13. Spiridonov A.A., Fadeeva M.L., Tolstych T.O. Strategic approach to implementation of innovation in the Arctics on the example of “Arctic Cascade” na-tural gas liquefaction technology. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2022;15(2):177–188. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-2-177-188

14. Fadeev A.M. Production Support in the Arctic: a Strategic Approach. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2021;1(1):15–27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2021-1-1-15-27

15. Fadeev A.M., Kmet O.V., Shchekalev R.V. Deve-lopment of the northern sea route infrastructure and production support for arctic exploration. Gazovaya promyshlennost’ = Russian Mining Industry. 2022;(4(831)):20–28. (In Russ.)

16. Ильинский А.А., Мнацаканян О.С., Череповицын А.Е. Нефтегазовый комплекс Северо-Запада России: стратегический анализ и концепции развития. СПб.: Наука; 2006. 475 с.

17. Фадеев А.М. Управление нефтегазовым комплексом нового добывающего региона при освоении морских углеводородных месторождений Арктики. Апатиты: Кольский научный центр РАН; 2011. 98 с.

18. Anisimov K.V. Prerequisites and ways of innovative and industrial clusters formation. Ekonomika i upravlenie v mashinostroenii. 2018;(5):20–22. (In Russ.)

19. Kisloshchaev P., Kapitonova N. Influence of digital economy on maintenance of economic safety of real sector of economy. Vestnik Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018;24(9):82–89. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2018-24-9-82-89

20. Titkov I.A. Digital oil and gas sector of the Russian Federation: Competitiveness issues. Vestnik MIRBIS = MIRBIS Research Journal. 2021;(3(27)):37–51. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25634/MIRBIS.2021.3.4

21. Choodu O.A., Bobobekov O.K., Saidaminov I.A. The current state of preventive maintenance, possible ways of development of maintenance of transport and technological machines. Politekhnicheskii vestnik. Seriya: Inzhenernye issledovaniya. 2019;(3(47)):101–108. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Spiridonov A.A., Fadeeva M.L., Tolstykh T.O. Strategic priorities of support of import substitution in industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023;16(2):166-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-2-166-175. EDN: YPUCVI

Views: 835


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-1633 (Print)
ISSN 2413-662X (Online)