Innovative development of high tech industrial complexes at the meso-level
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-2-201-212
EDN: ZTMSAU
Abstract
The issue of developing meso-level innovative ecosystems is so urgent due to the tasks of creating an autonomous independent economic system in the country, working out its own technologies, establishing technological, scientific and industrial independence. The urgency is also confirmed by the results of the analysis of characteristics and indicators of innovative activity of high tech companies. This background as well as evaluation of effectiveness of the government support of innovation, systematization of national and foreign studies devoted to the role of mesoeconomics in economic and technological growth of the regions and the entire state allow to justify the significance of meso-level development of high tech industrial complexes. The author suggests concentrating the efforts and tools of innovation, industrial and regional policies on the regional centres of development whose activities are aimed at maintaining the multiplicative effect of technological, information, social, infrastructural interconnection of the businesses, organizations, authorities and society. On the example of the Novgorod region, the author studies the components of high tech industrial complexes at the meso-level (object-, process-, system-, and project-related), characterizes the mechanism of development of industrial complexes of high tech sector at the meso-level and schematically shows how creation and development of the complex influences the growth of the indicators of innovative development of the region.
About the Author
Yu. V. DaneykinRussian Federation
Yury V. Daneykin – PhD (Phys.-Math.), Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for Educational Activities
41 Bolshaya Sankt Peterburgskaya, Veliky Novgorod, 173003
References
1. Земцов С.П. (ред.). Национальный доклад «Высокотехнологичный бизнес в регионах России». 2020. М.: РАНХиГС, АИРР; 2020. Вып. 3. 100 с.
2. Доклад о реализации государственной научно-технической политики в Российской Федерации и важнейших научных достижениях, полученных российскими учеными в 2020 году. М.: Изд-во «Наука»; 2021. 134 с. URL: https://www.inr.ru/rus/2021/doclad-ran.pdf (дата обращения: 13.07.2022).
3. Власова В.В., Гохберг Л.М., Грачева Г.А. и др. Индикаторы инновационной деятельности: 2022. М.: НИУ ВШЭ; 2022. 292 с. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/589979442.pdf (дата обращения: 13.07.2022).
4. Дитковский К.А. Бизнес наращивает объемы инвестиций в инновации. Наука. Технологии. Инновации: Экспресс-информация. ИСИЭЗ НИУ ВШЭ. 14 декабря 2021. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/541854593.pdf (дата обращения: 13.07.2022).
5. Дежина И.Г. Трансформационные исследования: новый приоритет государств после пандемии: Науч. труды № 181Р. Ин-т экономической политики им. Е.Т. Гайдара. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара; 2020. 116 с.
6. Власова В.В. С кем сотрудничает бизнес при разработке инноваций? Наука. Технологии. Инновации: Экспресс-информация. ИСИЭЗ НИУ ВШЭ. 8 декабря 2021. URL: (дата обращения: 13.07.2022). https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/539760084.pdf
7. Данейкин Ю.В. Управление развитием высокотехнологичного промышленного комплекса. М.: ИНФРА-М; 2023. 284 с. https://doi.org/10.12737/1911655
8. Daneikin Yu.V. Classification of innovative behavior of companies in high-tech industries. Voprosy regional’noi ekonomiki. 2022;(3(56)):36–45. (In Russ.)
9. Torre A., Zimmermann J.-B. From clusters to local industrial ecosystems. Revue d’Economie Industrielle. 2015;(52):13–38. https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.6204
10. Moore J.F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review. May–June, 1993. URL: https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition
11. Клейнер Г.Б. (ред.). Мезоэкономика России: стратегия разбега. М.: Изд. дом «Научная библиотека»; 2022. 808 с.
12. Magrini M. B., Galliano D. Agglomeration economies, firms’ spatial organization and innovation performance: Some evidence from the French industry. Industry and Innovation. 2012;19(7):607–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.726809
13. Doloreux D. Regional innovation systems in Canada: A comparative study. Regional Studies. 2004;38(5):479–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116042000229267
14. Crescenzi R., Jaax A. Innovation in Russia: the territorial dimension. Economic Geography. 2017;93(1):66–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1208532
15. Brilliantova V.V., Vlasova V.V., Fursov K.S. Technological diversity and access of Russian regional. Economy of Region. 2020;16(4):1224–1238. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-15
16. Rumyantsev A.A. (2021). Post-industrial technologies in the economy of the North-West of Russia. Economy of Region. 2021;17(1):103–113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021–1-8
17. Lyulyuchenko M.V. Development aspects of innovative systems of the middle stage in the digital economy. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava. 2021;(9-2):160–166. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.1854
Review
For citations:
Daneykin Yu.V. Innovative development of high tech industrial complexes at the meso-level. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023;16(2):201-212. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-2-201-212. EDN: ZTMSAU