The primary assessment of the industrial strategic priorities effectiveness

Industrial development is one of the most important areas contributing to the achievement of the strategic goal of ensuring the socio-economic development of any state or region. The success of the implementation of the designated goal is seen through a comprehensive process of strategizing industrial objects for a long period of time, namely through the effective development and implementation of signifi cant strategic priorities, which is especially relevant and important in post-normal conditions.
Meanwhile, the complex work of strategy developers at the fi rst stage determines a long list with concepts of industrial strategic priorities, the implementation of each of them requires a certain provision, while the strategizing object has a limited supply of resources and time. Thus, it is necessary to select from this long list those strategic priorities that will give the highest effi ciency with the least expenditure of resources and time.
In the article, the author proposes an expanded methodology for the primary assessment of the industrial strategic priorities effectiveness, which includes the process of parameterization of indicators for the estimated effects of industrial priorities, modeling and evaluation of the studied effects, the process of ranking industrial strategic priorities.
The proposed methodology for evaluating the primary assessment of the industrial strategic priorities effectiveness allows ranking them at the fi rst stages of strategizing and forming a short list, on the basis of which the strategy development team will continue to work on detailing, formalizing and compositioning all developed elements at the conceptual level into a single fi nal document – an industrial strategy. In addition, the author describes the main features, principles and assumptions of the extended methodology.

1. Сасаев Н.И. Стратегирование газовой отрасли России: дальневосточный вектор [под науч. ред. С.М. Дарькина, В.Л. Квинта]. М.: Первое экономическое издательство; 2022. 164 с. https://doi.org/10.18334/9785912924446

2. Sasaev N.I. Fundamentals of industrial strategizing: Formation of the concept. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(9):106–115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-106-115

3. Leonidova E.G., Sidorov M.A. Structural changes in the economy: searching for sectoral drivers of growth. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2019;12(6):166–181. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.9

4. Sasaev N.I. The role of industrial strategizing in the post-normal period. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2022;(3(135)):107–110. (In Russ.).

5. Alimuradov M.K. Interregional competition for strategic economic factors. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2021;1(2):163–172. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2021-1-2-163-172

6. Kvint V.L., Novikova I.V., Alimuradov M.K., Sasaev N.I. Strategizing the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(9):57–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67

7. Квинт В.Л. Стратегическое управление и экономика на глобальном формирующемся рынке. М.: Бизнес Атлас; 2012. 626 с.

8. Kvint V.L. Strategy for the global market: Theory and practical applications. N.Y.; London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 2016. 519 p.

9. Kvint V.L. Konzepte der strategie: Impulse für führungskräfte. Munchen: UVK Verlag; 2021. 128 p.

10. Kenichi O. The mind of the strategist: The art of Japanese business. UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 1982. 283 p.

11. Kvint V.L., Okrepilov V.V. Quality of life and values in national development strategies. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014;84(3):188–200. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331614030058

12. Nelson R.R., Phelps E.S. Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. The American Economic Review. 1965;56(1/2):69–75.

13. Sadovnichaya A.V. Social and economic efficiency of exhibitions and fairs: Methodology and practice. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = The Economic Revival of Russia. 2019;(1(59)):76–85. (In Russ.)

14. Livchits V.N., Mironova I.A., Shvetsov A.N. Evaluating investment projects efficiency in various conditions. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2019;12(1):29–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2019-1-29-43

15. Sasaev N. The primary assessment of the economic efficiency of strategic directions of development of gas industry in Russia. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods. 2020;56(2):52–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S042473880009219-9

16. Galiullin Kh. Yu., Ermakov G.P. Effect as a category in the theory of efficacy (Russia, Dimitrovgrad). Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. 2013;(4(48)):120–124. (In Russ.)

17. Shtele E.A., Vecherkovskaya O.B. On the concept of efficiency. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2017;16(5(464)):935–947. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.16.5.935

18. Ricardo D. Principles of political economy and taxation. UK: G. Bell and Sons; 1891. 455 p.

19. Van Gigch J.P. Applied general systems theory. UK: Harper & Row; 1978. 602 p.

20. Doyle P., Stern P. Marketing management and strategy. Harlow, England; New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2006. 446 p.

21. Макаров В.Л., Бахтизин А.Р., Эпштейн Д.М. Агент-ориентированное моделирование для сложного мира. М.: МАКС Пресс; 2022. 85 с.

22. Khabriev B.R., Bakhtizina N.V., Bakhtizin А.R. Approach to an integrated assessment of the effectiveness of the development strategy of the Russian oil industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2020;13(1):123–131. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-1-123-131

23. L’vov D.S., Mednitskii V.G., Mednitskii Yu.V., Ovsienko Yu.V. On the assessment of the effectiveness of the functioning of large-scale economic facilities. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods. 1996;32(1):5–18. (In Russ.)

24. Belinskiy A.V. Influence of the gas supply and the gas infrastructure development on economic growth of regions of the Russian Federation (econometric approach). Gazovaya promyshlennost’ = Gas Industry Journal. 2018;(S2(770)):6–13. (In Russ.)

25. Nkoro E., Uko A.K. Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration technique: Application and interpretation. Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods. 2016;5(4):63–91.

26. Hill R.C., Griffiths W.E., Judge G.G., Reiman M.A. Undergraduate econometrics. In 16 ch. N.Y.: Wiley; 2001. Ch. 4. 402 p.

27. Сасаев Н.И. Теоретические основы и методология разработки стратегии развития газовой отрасли России. СПб.: СЗИУ РАНХиГС; 2019. 176 с.

28. Hassler U., Wolters J. Autoregressive distributed lag models and cointegration. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv. 2006;90:57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0221-5

29. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica. 1981;49(4):1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517

30. Durbin J., Watson G.S. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I. Biometrika. 1950;37(3-4):409–428.

31. Durbin J., Watson G.S. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II. Biometrika. 1951;38(1-2):159–178.

32. Breusch T.S., Pagan A.R. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica. 1979;47(5):1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911963

33. Квинт В.Л. Вглядываясь в будущее: изыскания пророков, предсказателей, лидеров и стратегов. СПб.: СЗИУ РАНХиГС; 2018. 28 с.

34. Sasaev N.I. Fundamentals of industrial strategiо (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-1-7-19