SMART-analysis of the objectives of Russian oil and gas companies on reducing greenhouse gas emissions

Due to the aggravation of the climate agenda, energy and industry all over the world are facing the unprecedented challenges caused by the necessity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Industrial companies are intensifying the trends and plans of low carbon development, take actions on reducing greenhouse gases emissions as it is the most important component of the general business climate responsibility. This, in its turn, requires adaptation of the approaches at the level of strategic management including goal setting. The study is devoted to development of a scientific and methodological approach to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (climate objectives of oil and gas companies) within the system of strategic management of decarbonization activities. As a result of the study, the authors suggest a scientific and methodological approach to adaptation of the SMART-method to analyzing climate objectives which includes updated parameters of the SMART criteria, the method of conducting SMART-analysis and scientific and methodological tools of quantitative evaluation of achievability of the goals set by oil and gas companies on the basis of calculation of the basic, actual, target and plan levels of climate indicators. The proposed approach has been tested on the example of the goals on reducing greenhouse gas emissions declared by the largest oil and gas companies of Russia. The information and analytical base of the study includes the reports on sustainable development of Russian oil and gas companies. The authors reveal the typology of goal setting and suggest recommendations on how to improve the process within the system of strategic management of decarbonization activities at the company level. It has been discovered that nine out of fifteen climate objectives of Russian oil and gas companies completely comply with the SMART criteria. Also, one third of the goals is actually achieved which indicates that the companies are focused on realistic goal setting and permanent improvement of the internal processes in the area.

1. Doran G.T. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. Way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review. 1981;70(11):35-36.

2. Wheelen T.L., Hunger J.D. Strategic management and Business policy toward global sustainability. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2015. 827 p.

3. Ilinova A.A., Solovyova V.M. Strategic planning and forecasting: changing role under instability of energy sector. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka = The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order. 2021;24(2(72)):56-68. https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.2.2021.72.005

4. Zhukovskiy Y., Koshenkova A., Vorobeva V., Rasputin D., Pozdnyakov R. Assessment of the impact of technological development and scenario forecasting of the sustainable development of the fuel and energy complex. Energies. 2023;16(7):3185. https:// https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/en16073185

5. Dmitrieva D.M., Skobelev D.O. Decarbonization of the oil and gas sector in the context of sustainable development: Key directions and possible scenarios for the Arctic region. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka = The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order. 2023;(2):7-23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.2.2023.80.001

6. Halttunen K., Slade R., Staffell I. Diversify or die: Strategy options for oil majors in the sustainable energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023;104:103253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103253

7. Morgunova M., Shaton K. The role of incumbents in energy transitions: Investigating the perceptions and strategies of the oil and gas industry. Energy Research & Social Science. 2022;89:102573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102573

8. Tillotson P., Slade R., Staffell I., Halttunen K. Deactivating climate activism? The seven strategies oil and gas majors use to counter rising shareholder action. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023;103:103190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103190

9. Pickl M.J. The renewable energy strategies of oil majors - From oil to energy? Energy Strategy Reviews. 2019;26:100370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100370

10. Maxwell S.L., Milner-Gulland E.J., Jones J.P., Knight A.T., Bunnefeld N., Nuno A., Bal P., Earle S., Watson J.E., Rhodes J.R. Environmental science. Being smart about SMART environmental targets. Science. 2015;347(6226):1075-1081.

11. Andersen I., Ishii N., Brooks T., Cummis C., Fonseca G., Hillers A., Macfarlane N., Nakicenovic N., Moss K., Rockström J., Steer A., Waughray D., Zimm C. Defining ‘science-based targets’. National Science Review. 2021;8(7):nwaa186. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa186

12. Kvint V.L. Kontseptsiya strategirovaniya. T. 2. SPb.: SZIU RANKhiGS; 2022. 164 s.

13. Dietz S., Gardiner D., Jahn V., Noels J. How ambitious are oil and gas companies’ climate goals? Science. 2021;374(6566):405-408.

14. Cherepovitsyn A., Rutenko E. Strategic planning of oil and gas companies: The decarbonization transition. Energies. 2022;15(17):6163. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176163

15. Cherepovitsyna A., Sheveleva N., Riadinskaia A., Danilin K. Decarbonization Measures: a real effect or just a declaration? An assessment of oil and gas companies’ progress towards carbon neutrality. Energies. 2023;16(8):3575. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083575

16. Selvik J.T., Bansal S., Abrahamsen E.B. On the use of criteria based on the SMART acronym to assess quality of performance indicators for safety management in process industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2021;70(1-2):104392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104392

17. Selvik J.T., Stanley I., Abrahamsen E.B. Criteria for quality assessment of key performance indicators used in the oil and gas industry. International Journal of Performability Engineering. 2020;16(7):999-1007. https://doi.org/10.23940/ijpe.20.07.p2.9991007

18. Zelenyi tuman 2.0. M.: OOO FIL «Delovoi ekspress»; 2024. 160 s.

19. Dobrokhotova M.V., Skobelev D.O. Organisational and economic mechanism for regulating industrial carbon intensity. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2023;15(1):24. (In Russ.)

20. Dobrohotova M.V., Matushanskij A.V. Applying the best available techniques concept for the technological transformation of industry under the energy transition conditions. Ehkonomika ustoichivogo razvitiya = Economics of Sustainable Development. 2022;(2(50)):63-68. (In Russ.)