Strategic assessment of the compliance of open diffuse agglomerations with global, national and regional trends (Kemerovo region – Kuzbass agglomerations case study)

The objective of the study is to identify global, national, and regional trends that influence the creation and development of open diffuse agglomerations in the Kemerovo region – Kuzbass (North Kuzbass and South Kuzbass), and to assess their mutual compliance. The study is based on the general theory of strategy and strategizing methodology of the Russian scientific school developed by the Center for Strategic Research at the Institute of Mathematical Research of Complex Systems and the Economic and Financial Strategy Department at Moscow School of Economics at Lomonosov Moscow State University; the OTSW analysis method and economic and statistical tools for processing quantitative data are used. The author’s classification of trends associated with the development of open diffuse agglomerations has been developed. At the global level, strategic opportunities for them are associated with such trends as: changing the significance of distances between agglomeration participants under the influence of digital technologies, transition to vertical multi-level cities, development of creative and smart cities (affect the agglomeration as a whole); growth of rural tourism, eco-settlements, diversification of the rural economy (affect mainly rural municipal districts of the agglomeration); digitalization, differentiated urbanization, climate change and green transition (affect mainly cities). It is shown that digitalization and green transition trends create risks of increasing spatial inequality, as well as for providing regional strategies with resources. These risks can be countered based on the harmonious development of diffuse open agglomerations. At the national level, open diffuse agglomerations are affected by the dynamics of the Russian economy as a whole, a change in the approach to the spatial development of the country, changes in the spatial significance of individual agglomerations, and a decrease in the affordability of housing. In the Kemerovo region – Kuzbass, the trend of creating a legislative framework for agglomeration development is positive. There are trends that cause risks, in particular, an increase in internal spatial inequality, a decrease in the region’s share in the Russian economy, a weakening of competitiveness, and the potential of basic industries of specialization. The study revealed strategic opportunities in the external environment that should be used to determine the mission, vision, and strategic priorities of open diffuse agglomerations.

1. Квинт В.Л. Концепция стратегирования. В 2 т. Т. 1. СПб.: СЗИУ РАНХиГС; 2019. 132 с.

2. Квинт В.Л. Концепция стратегирования. Кемерово: КемГУ; 2022. 170 с. https://doi.org/10.21603/978-5-8353-2562-7

3. Kvint V.L. Theoretical basis and methodology of strategizing of the private and public sectors of the Kuzbass region as a medial subsystem of the national economy. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2020;13(3):290–299. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-3-290-299

4. Tsivilev S.Е. Strategizing directions for agglo-|meration effects. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2024;4(3):284–297. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-3-284-297

5. Tsivilev S.E. The process of strategizing the formation and development of agglomerations in the Kemerovo region – Kuzbass. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2024;17(3):237-244. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-3-1341

6. Seredyuk I.V., Korchagina I.V. Agglomeration as a strategic track for the regional development: prospects and limitations. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2023;3(4):379–392. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2023-3-4-379-392

7. Seredyuk I.V. Open diffuse regional agglomerations: strategic potential and strategizing. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2024;4(4):420–437. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-420-437

8. Экономическая и финансовая стратегия. Под науч. ред. В.Л. Квинта. М.: Издательство Московского университета; 2024. 248 с.

9. Kvint V.L., Bodrunov S.D. Strategizing societal transformation. Knowledge, technologies, and noonomy. USA (Palm Bay): Canada (Burlington): United Kingdom (Abingdon): Apple Academic Press; 2023. 228 p.

10. Анимица Е.Г., Власова Н.Ю. Градоведение. Екатеринбург: Издательство Уральского государственного экономического университета; 2008. 417 с.

11. Percik E.N. Problems of urban agglomeration development. Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2009;(2): 63–69. (In Russ.)

12. Rastvortseva S.N. Economic activity in Russian regions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2018;11(1):84–99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2018.1.55.6

13. Suvorova A.V. Urban agglomerations: functioning and methodological principles of development. Theoretical and Applied Economics. 2023;(4):1–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8647.2023.4.68863

14. Fu W., Luo C., He S. Does urban agglomeration promote the development of cities? An empirical analysis based on spatial econometrics. Sustainability. 2022;14(21):14512. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114512

15. Dong X., Zhang X., Zhou Q. Underload and overload communities: Revealing the conflicts between population distribution and carrying capacity at an inner-city community scale. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2023;98:104793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104793

16. Frolking S., Mahtta R., Milliman T., Esch T., Seto K. Global urban structural growth shows a profound shift from spreading out to building up. Nature Cities. 2024;1:555–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00100-1

17. Peira G., Longo D., Pucciarelli F., Bonadonna A. rural tourism destination: The ligurian farmers’ perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13(24):13684. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413684

18. Malik P., Singh R., Gehlot A., Akram S., Das P. Village 4.0: Digitalization of village with smart internet of things technologies. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2022;165:107938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.107938

19. Cividino S., Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir R., Salvati L. Revisiting the “City life cycle”: global urbanization and implications for regional development. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031151

20. Chen S., Huang Q., Muttarak R., Fang J., Liu T., He C., Liu Z., Zhu L. Updating global urbanization projections under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Scientific Data. 2022;9:137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01209-5

21. Долгосрочные тренды в экономике, жилищной и градостроительной сферах крупнейших городских агломераций России. Под ред. Н.Б. Косаревой. М.: Фонд «Институт экономики города»; 2023. 84 с.

22. Rastvortseva S.N., Blokhina S.D. Regional agglomeration effects in Russia’s economy. Problems of Territory’s Development. 2024;28(3):10–28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2024.3.131.2

23. Доступность жилья в России. М.: Фонд «Институт экономики города»; 2024. 55 с.

24. Lisina N.L., Ushakova A.P., Baev V.D. Legislative basis for the development of agglomerations in the Kemerovo region (Kuzbass). Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2023;7(2):214–223. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2023-7-2-214-223

25. Ivanter V.V., Klepach A.N., Kuvalin D.B., Shirov A.A., Yankov K.V. The priority action program for social and economic recovery of Kuzbass region. ECO. 2018;48(11):31–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2018-11-31-46

26. Khokhrina O.I. Kuzbass-2035: the territory as a driver of economic growth. World of Economics and Management. 2020;20(4):61–77. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-4-61-77