现代数字经济中的主动性：概念基础与评估

现代世界的竞争力需要一种特定类型的市场行为。积极的技术发展和数字化转型趋势，加上高度不确定的条件，决定了人们对经济主体积极主动行为的科学兴趣。本文探讨了 “经济主体的主动性” 这一概念，即基于对未来趋势和系统性风险的预测，主动且积极地改变其活动的内部环境和外部条件的能力。科学来源的分析是根据主动行为问题领域的关键词的存在情况，在文献计量图（网络）的基础上进行的。本文构建了识别主动行为的结构要素及其评估的研究基础。基于文献计量分析，结合网络分析方法和人工智能工具，识别出主动行为模式的结构要素/特征，从而构建了一个全面的主动性评估体系。在所分析的问题领域中，评估主动性最常用的要素和指标包括：战略主动性要素、主动风险管理体系、创新接受度和创新成熟度、技术成熟度/潜力、数据处理系统的成熟度和潜力以及主动的信息处理。强调评估经济主体的主动性水平和潜力以及关键驱动因素，以便将相关目标指标纳入企业发展战略的重要性。

1. Crant J.M. Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management. 2000;26(3):435–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00044-1

2. Ильина О.Н., Лепёхин Н.Н., Маничев С.А. Проактивное рабочее поведение: концепции и направления исследований. Организационная психология. 2022;12(1):92–127. https://doi.org/10.17323/23125942-2022-12-1-92-127

3. Schmitz G.S., Schwarzer R. Proaktive einstellung von lehrern: Konstruktbeschreibung und psychometrische analysen [Teachers’ proactive attitude: Construct description and psychometric analyses]. Zeitschrift für Empirische Pädagogik. 1999;13(1):3–27.

4. Lieder F., Iwama G. Toward a formal theory of proactivity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuro- science. 2021;21(3):490–508. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-021-00884-y

5. Antoncic B., Hisrich R.D. Clarifying the entrepreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business Entrepreneurship and Development. 2001;10(1):7–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000310461187

6. Lumpkin T., Dess G.G. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing. 2001;16(5):429–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(00)00048-3

7. Bateman T.S., Crant J.M. The proactive component of organizational behavior: Ameasure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1993;14(2):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213415

8. Sarasvathy S.D., Kumar K., York J.G., Bhagavatula S. An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: overlaps, challenges and provocative possibilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2014;38(1):71–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12088

9. Бабкин А.В., Шкарупета Е.В. Индустрия 6.0: сущность, тенденции и стратегические возможности для России. Экономика промышленности. 2024;17(4):353–377. https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-4-1369

10. Якобсон Л.И. Стратегическое планирование в условиях неопределенности: адаптивность ради устойчивости. Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2023;(4(61)):230–236. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_230-236

11. Lumpkin G.T., Gregory G.D. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review. 1996;21(1):135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632

12. Sancho-Zamora R., Peña-García I., Gutiérrez-Broncano S., Hernández-Perlines F. Moderating effect of proactivity on firm absorptive capacity and performance: Empirical evidence from Spanish firms. Mathematics. 2021;9(17):2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172099

13. Wach K., Maciejewski M., Głodowska A. Inside entrepreneurial orientation: Do risktaking and innovativeness influence proactiveness? Econo- mics & Sociology. 2023;16(1):159–175. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2023/16-1/11

14. Li H., Wu Y., Cao D., Wang Y. Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. Journal of Business Research. 2021;122(5):700–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.036

15. Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 1997;18(7):509–533.

16. Eisenhardt K., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal. 2000;21(10-11):1105–1121.

17. Андреева Т.Е., Чайка В.А. Динамические способности фирмы: что необходимо, чтобы они были динамическими? Научные доклады. 2006;(2(R)-2006):1–32.

18. Wu C.-H., Parker S.K. Thinking and acting in anticipation: a review of research on proactive behavior. Advances in Psychological Science. 2013;21(4):679–700. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00679

19. Araújo G., Kato H., Del Corso J. Dynamic capabilities, strategic planning and performance: A virtuous and mutually reinforcing cycle. Journal of Management & Organization. 2022;28(5):1116–1132. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.33

20. Шипкова О.Т., Акимова Е.Н., Шатаева О.В. Инструменты планирования и принятия решений в условиях глубокой неопределенности как основа проактивной позиции экономического субъекта. Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Экономика. 2022;(2):127–141. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6646-2022-2-127-141

21. Bateman T.S., Crant J.M. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1993;14(2):103–118.

22. Chen S., Guo L., Alghaith T., Dong D., Alluhidan M., Hamza M.M., Herbst C.H., Zhang X., Tagtag G.C.A., Zhang Y., Alazemi N., Saber R., Alsukait R., Tang S. Effective COVID-19 Control: A comparative analysis of the stringency and timeliness of government responses in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(16):8686. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168686

23. Mergel I., Edelmann N., Haug N. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly. 2021;38(4):101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

24. Leydesdorff L. The evolutionary dynamics of discursive knowledge. Communication-theoretical perspectives on an empirical philosophy of science. Springer Cham.; 2020. 247 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3030-59951-5

25. Шипкова О.Т. Методические аспекты трансформации бизнес-моделей в цифровой экономике. Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. 2024;(4):47–55.