MONITORING OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONAL QUALITIES OF FUTURE PROFESSIONALS

The crucial factor determining the transformation of the Russian economy into the innovative one is labor force or rather its quality. The generally accepted determination of quality is the definition formulated in the International Standard ISO 9000 “.. the extent to which the requirements set their own characteristics”.
The system of university management focused on achieving quality “product” – the graduated student regards students as the internal consumer of resources (intellectual capital, materials, information and financial resources) and at the same time as the major stakeholder in the university success.
At the same time the practice shows that the students are not sufficiently involved in the educational process. In our view, the are not psychologically unprepared for training in the high school , and this fact is not taken into consideration in the educational process of the university.
A special attention must be paid to the psychological status of a student. First, students are young people with not entirely shaped mentality and social and personal features.
Second, students often find themselves during the period of study in stressful situation.
The aim of the study was to determine the level of anxiety of students after the winter session . As the method the anonymous testing by Taylor was chosen (adapted by T. Nemchina). In 140 tested students the anxiety level was mostly increased : the average level with the tendency to lower was detected in 69 people while 59 students demonstrated an average anxiety level with the tendency to increase. A rather high portion of tested people presented high level of anxiety (40 persons), with 5 people showing the highest level.
The article deals with the causes of psychological problems among students. The result of this study confirm that the future professionals are not always mentally prepared for the independent activity. A serious attention must be paid to the problems of specific training of student in the course of professional education.

1. Методика измерения уровня тревожности Тейлора (адаптация Т. А. Немчина). URL: http://psyvek.ru (дата обращения:15.12.2012).

2. Соловьев В.П., Богатов Е.М. Организация эксперимента. – Старый Оскол: «ТНТ», 2012. 253 с.

3. Соловьев В.П., Золотарева Н.М., Крупин Ю.А. Двухуровневая подготовка инженеров в России. М.: «ИД МИСиС», 2013. 180 с.

4. Психология и педагогика: учеб. пособ. для вузов / Под ред. А.А. Радугина. М.: Центр, 2002. 256 с.

5. Перескокова Т.А. Роль гуманитарных дисциплин в профессиональной подготовке бакалавров-инженеров // Экономика в промышленности. 2012. № 3. С. 76–78.

6. Карабасов Ю.С., Кочетов А.И., Соловьев В.П., Дубровина Л.А. Всеобщее управление на основе качества. М.: «Учеба» МИСиС, 2003. 143 с.