Evaluation of the effectiveness of the industrial integrated structure
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2015-3-75-81
Abstract
Currently, the Russian industry in most cases is represented by such entities as industrial integrated structures (IPR). Typical representatives of IPR are JSC “Gazprom”, “Lukoil”, JSC “Mechel” Steel Group OAO “Chelyabinsk Tube Rolling Plant”, OAO “TMK”, JSC “United Metallurgical Company”, JSC group “GUTA”, JSC “Ural Mining-Metallurgical Company” and others. The contemporary studies shows this form of modern research management to provide the following benefits for separate business units, which are the part of the IPR: they have great potential for the implementation of the competitive advantage strategy; they have the ability to create closed production chains and to diversify the production. They are able to save administration costs by centralizing certain functions, etc. Today, much attention is paid to assessing the performance of the industrial integrated structures. However, the complexity and diversity of the process of mergers and acquisitions of business entities do not allow to form a consensus and unified approach to solve the problem. The article discusses the nature of the integration process of companies, reveals specific features and provides methodical approach to the assessment of the effectiveness of an integrated industrial structure taking into account arising synergies.
About the Author
M. I. Bazhanova
South Ural State University (Natio nal Research University) FSSFEI HPE “SUSU” (NRU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor., Deputy Head of Chair 76 Lenin prospekt, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia
References
1. Kardapol’tsev K.V. Sovershenstvovanie metodov otsenki ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti promyshlennykh integrirovannykh struktur kholdingovogo tipa [Improved methods of evaluating the economic efficiency of industrial integrated structures of holding type]: diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. Chelyabinsk, 2009. 211 p. (In Russ).
2. Bogdanov A.A. Tektologiya. Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka [Tectology. Universal organiza tional science]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1989. 354 p. (In Russ).
3. 3. Mezentseva O.E. Otsenka ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti integratsii promyshlennykh predpriyatii [Estimation of economic efficiency of industrial enterpri ses integration]: diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. Tyumen’, 2006. 164 p. (In Russ).
4. Kedrov B.M. Nauchnye revolyutsii (Sushchnost’. Tipologiya. Struktura. Mekhanizm. Kriterii). Moscow: Znanie, 1980. 64 p. (In Russ).
5. Mil‘ner, B.Z. Teoriya organizatsii: Kurs lektsii: Dlya vuzov po spetsial’nosti «Menedzhment» [Organization Theory: Lectures: For universities in the specialty «Management»]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 1998. 334 p. (In Russ).
6. Spenser G. Sotsiologiya, kak predmet izucheniya: [Sociology as a subject of study]. Per. s posled. (1889 g.) angl. izd.: S prim. i vstup. ocherkom. SPb.: tip. A. Yakobsona nasl., 1896. 405 p. (In Russ).
7. Kozhin A.E. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ vertikal’noi integratsii lesopromyshlennykh predpriyatii: Na primere Arkhangel’skoi oblasti [Economic efficiency of the vertical integration of the timber industry enterprises: the example of the Arkhangelsk Region]: diss. kand. ekon.nauk: 08.00.05. Arkhangel’sk, 2002. 141 p. (In Russ).
8. Ushakov D.N. Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Great Dictionary of Russian language]. ok. 60000 sl. sost.: V. V. Vinogradov i dr.; pod red. D. N. Ushakova. Moscow: AST; Astrel’, 2008. 1268 p. (In Russ).
9. Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya [Great Soviet Encyclopedia]. Pod red. A.M. Prokhorova. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1975. Vol. 20. (In Russ).
10. Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya [Great Soviet Encyclopedia]: V 30 t. Pod red. A.M. Prokhorova. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1972. Vol. 10. 592 p. (In Russ).
11. Raizberg B.A. , Lozovskii L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B. Sovremennyi ekonomicheskii slovar’: [Modern Dictio nary of Economics]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2006. 495 p. (In Russ).
12. Borisov A.B. Bol’shoi ekonomicheskii slovar’ [Great Dictionary of Economics]. Moscow: Knizhnyi mir, 1999. 895 p. (In Russ).
13. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Philoso phical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Red.-sost.: E.F. Gubskii, G.V. Korableva, V.A. Lutchenko. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2001. 574 p. (In Russ).
14. Bol’shoi tolkovyi psikhologicheskii slovar’ [Big Explanatory Dictionary psychological]. Robert Artur: per. s angl. Moscow: Veche; ASP, 2000. 592 p. (In Russ).
15. Kondrat’ev V.V., Irikov V.A., Fedchenko K.N. Financial holding companies and corporate business groups. Finansovyi biznes. 1996. No. 11. Pp. 37–41. (In Russ).
16. Ulez’ko A.V. Strategiya formirovaniya i taktika ispol’zovaniya resursnogo potentsiala sel’skokhozyaistvennykh predpriyatii [Strategy and tactics of formation of resource potential of agricultural enterpri ses]. Voronezh: GP «IPF «Voronezh», 2004. 224 p. (In Russ).
17. Genov S.A. Prognozirovanie rezul’tativnosti formirovaniya i funktsionirovaniya integrirovannykh struktur v promyshlennosti: [Predicting the impact of formation and functioning of the integrated structures in the industry] diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. SPb, 2002. 134 p. (In Russ).
18. Meshcheryakova S.A. Razvitie integratsii proizvodstva v rynochnoi ekonomike [The development of production integration in the market economy]: diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.01. Kazan’, 2002. 176 p. (In Russ).
19. Svechnikova V.V. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskii mekhanizm innovatsionnogo razvitiya korporativnykh struktur [Organizational-economic mechanism of innovative development of corporate structures]: diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. Ekaterinburg, 2010. 200 p. (In Russ).
20. Gal’perin S.B., Kenevich E.S. Organizatsiya uprav leniya innovatsionnym razvitiem v korporativnoi strukture [Organization of innovative development in the corporate structure]. Moscow: OAO «Institut mikroekonomiki », 2007. 164 p. (In Russ).
21. Galkin D.E. Instrumenty sovershenstvovaniya upravleniya effektivnost’yu promyshlennykh predpriyatii [Tools improve the management efficiency of industrial enterprises]: diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. Moscow, 2004. 183 p. (In Russ).
22. Gaponenko A.L. Upravlenie ekonomicheskim razvitiem [Economic development management]. Moscow: YuNITI-DANA, 2003. 558 p. (In Russ).
23. Goncharov V.V. Vazhneishie kriterii rezul’tativnosti upravleniya [The most important criteria for performance management]. MNIIPU, 1998. 304 p. (In Russ).
24. Gradoboev E.V. Osobennosti otsenki effektivnosti deyatel’nosti promyshlennykh predpriyatii [Features of performance evaluation of industrial enterprises]: diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. Irkutsk, 2009. 162 p. (In Russ).
25. Kalinin, Yu. A. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskii mekhanizm upravleniya sel’skim khozyaistvom na raionnom urovne v usloviyakh razvitiya mestnogo samoupravleniya: na primere Saratovskoi oblasti [Organizational-economic mechanism of management of agriculture at the district level in terms of development of local self-government: the example of the Saratov region]: diss. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. Saratov, 2007. 255 p. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Bazhanova M.I. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the industrial integrated structure. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2015;(3):75-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2015-3-75-81
Views:
723
Email this article 