Thes “value” and “efficiency” terms in process management
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2015-3-95-102
Abstract
The concepts of value, utility, cost and efficiency in economic theory presenting both the backbone and discussion matter, still do not have a single interpretations, experts continue to argue about the relationships that exist between them. The process management widely uses the terms «valuable proposition», «the process created value», «value chain», «value creating flow». Often it remains unclear what kind of values the authors mean and how to evaluate it. The purpose of the transition to process management is interpreted as elevated efficiency, however, the focus on the quantitative assessment of the efficiency does not guarantee commercial success of the enterprise. The «effectiveness» term has many meanings. There arise a problem how to attach to the terms «value» and «efficiency» a consistent explanation where the applied meaning would not be contrary to the fundamental one , otherwise their use in process management would lead to confusion. The solution of this problem has great practical importance for the business analysts when the company plans to shift to process management. Without it will remain unclear what is the value for the consumer , how it is formed, how to analyze the process, how to discriminate work creating value and cost. Not understanding the nature of business performance, the analyst does not know how it can be controlled. The article shows that the classic process management rather freely uses the terms value and effectiveness, so that in each case one has to understand whichthe ultimate meaning lays in those concepts. It is proposed to separate the phase of business process modeling, where the technological process of production is prepared and which appears to be a key for overall economic impact, since it is exactly this stage where the standard cost-effectiveness of the business is created.
About the Author
I. G. FedorovRussian Federation
Candidate of Tehn. Sciences, Prof. kaf. «PIE», 7 Nezhinskaya Str., Moscow 119501, Russia
References
1. Braginskii S.V., Pevzner Ya.A. Politicheskaya ekonomiya: diskussionnye problemy, puti obnovleniya. [Political Economy: Debatable issues, we upgrade paths]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1991. 300 p. (In Russ).
2. Harmon P. How do Processes Create Value? BPTrends. Available at: http://ww.bptrends.com/publi cationfiles/02-01-11-ART-How%20do%20Processes%20Create%20
3. Value- Harmon-Final.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2014).
4. Skripkin K.G. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ informatsionnykh sistem v Rossii. [Cost-effectiveness of information systems in Russia]. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2014. 155 p. (In Russ).
5. Lotte D.S. Osnovy postroeniya nauchnotekhnicheskoi terminologii. Voprosy teorii i metodiki. [Fundamentals of scientific and technical terminology. Theory and methodology]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 1961.160 p. (In Russ).
6. Rummler G.A., Ramias A.J., Rummler R.A. White space revisited: creating value through process. Jossey- Bass, 2010. 280 p.
7. Druker P.F., Mak’yarello D.A. Menedzhment. [Mana gement]. Moscow: I.D. Vil’yams, 2010. 704 p. (In Russ).
8. Davenport T.H., Short J.E. The New Industrial Enginee ring: Information Technology and Business Pro cess Redesign. Sloan Management Review. 1990. Pp. 11–27.
9. Porter M.E., Millar V.E. How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review. 1985. No. 85. Pp. 149-160.
10. Smith H., Fingar P. Business Process Management: The Third Wave. Meghan Kiffer, 2006. 312 p.
11. Khammer M., Champi D. Reinzhiniring korporatsii. Manifest revolyutsii v biznese. [Reengineering the Corporation. The manifesto of the revolution in business]. Moscow, 2006. 288 p. (In Russ).
12. Harmon P. Value Chains and Other Processes. BPTrends. Available at: http://ww.bptrends.com/deliver_file.cfm?fileType=publication&fileName=advisor200902 24%2Epdf (accessed: 15.01.2014).
13. Bem-Baverk O. fon. Osnovy teorii tsennosti kho zyaistvennykh blag. Sushchnost’ i proiskhozhdenie sub»ektivnoi tsennosti. [Basic theory of the value of economic goods. The nature and origin of the subjective value]. Moscow: Direktmedia Pablishing, 2008. 196 p. (In Russ).
14. Pomitov S.A. Sozdanie dobavlennoi tsennosti kak odna iz tselei funktsionirovaniya rynochno-orientirovannoi organizatsii [Creating added value as one of the goals of the functioning of a market-oriented organization]. EKportal.ru – Informatsionnyi sait po ekonomike Available at: http://www.ekportal.ru/page-id-1880.html. (accessed: 15.01.2014). (In Russ).
15. Lopatnikov L.I. Ekonomiko-matematicheskii slovar’: Slovar’ sovremennoi ekonomicheskoi nauki. [Economics and Mathematics Dictionary: Dictionary of modern economics]. Moscow: Delo, 2003.168 p. (In Russ).
16. Efimov V.V., Paimushkina N.V. Added Value and Cost. Standarty i kachestvo. 2006. No. 8. Pp. 78-82. (In Russ).
17. Panov M. Otsenka deyatel’nosti i sistema upravle niya kompaniei na osnove KPI. [Evaluation of the company’s management system and KPI-based]. Moscow: Infra-M, 2013. 255 p.
18. Rebrin Yu.I. Upravlenie kachestvom. [Quality control]. Taganrog: TRTU, 2004. 93 p. (In Russ).
19. Ingland R. Vvedenie v real’nyi ITSM. [Introduction to Real ITSM]. Moscow: Laivbuk, 2010. 132 p. (In Russ).
20. Hradesky J.L. Total quality management handbook. McGraw-Hill. Inc., 1995. 712 p..
21. Mintzberg H.A Note on that Dirty Word «Efficiency ». Interfaces. 1982. Vol. 12. No. 5. Pp. 101–105.
Review
For citations:
Fedorov I.G. Thes “value” and “efficiency” terms in process management. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2015;(3):95-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2015-3-95-102