Evaluation of the brand of a trading company
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2015-4-61-70
Abstract
The aim of the article is to test basing on real data one of the methods to evaluate the cost of the brand of a trading company and to confirm the effectiveness of its branding. The brand of a trading company is one of its assets (resources) and the most effective one judging on the «cost / result» ratio. The availability of the brand (trade marks) presents the basis for competitiveness and development of the company. Evaluation of the brand presents not only a theoretical but also a practical task. The interaction between theoretical research and practical calculations allows to construct a theory of evaluation of intangible assets and, in practice, to increase the market value of the company. The article presents a brief analysis of the Premium Profit method of brand evaluation and calculation of the cost of brands owned by CB trading company. The results show the effectiveness of branding. The method of such brand effectiveness calculation can be applied in trade companies as well as on other companies having a well arranged calculation of sell and profit of certain types of products or services. Methods of calculating the value of the brand (trade marks) is recommended for traders to increase their capitalization and competitiveness.
About the Author
B. G. Kiselev
JSC «SPONK»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economics Sciences, Director General,
Moscow Domodedovo Str., house 20, building 3, 115551
References
1. Chernozub O.L. Brand value: the reality surpasses the myths. Marketing i issledovaniya. No. 1–2. 2003. Pp. 39–49. (In Russ).
2. Salinas G. The International Brand Valuation Manual / John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. 2009-04-17. (In Russ).
3. Nikulina K.G. Methods for assessing the value of the brand. Ekonomika i pravo. 2012. No. 4. Pp.31–36. (In Russ).
4. Medvedeva Yu.Yu. Private label in food retailing as a factor of customer loyalty. Prakticheskii marketing. No. 8 (138). 2008. Pp. 26. (In Russ).
5. Skorobogatykh I.I., Chinyaeva D.A. Comparative analysis of existing methodologies to assess the cost of the brand. Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2003. No. 4. (In Russ).
6. Roznichnye torgovye seti: strategii, ekonomika i upravlenie: uchebnoe posobie/ kol.avtorov; pod red. A.A. Esyu tina i E.V. Karpovoi. [Retail network: strategy, economics and management: a training manual] Moscow: KNO-RUS, 2007. Pp. 241. (In Russ).
7. Aaker D.A. Sozdanie sil’nykh brendov. [Building strong brands]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii Dom Grebennikova, 2003. 440 p. (In Russ).
8. Vinsent L. Legendarnye brendy. Raskruchennye reklamnye mify, v kotorye poveril ves’ mir. [Legendary brands. Hyped advertising myths in the whole world who believed]. Per. s angl. Moscow: FAIR-PRESS, 2004. 334 p. (In Russ).
9. Zhukova N.Yu., Matasov G.M. Kak otsenit’ stoimost’ brenda: modifikatsiya modeli [How to assess the value of the brand: modification of the model]. Hirose, 2010. (In Russ).
10. Temporal P. Effektivnyi brend-menedzhment. [Effec tive brand management]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’skii Dom Neva, 2003. 320 p. (In Russ).
11. Chernozub O.L. A new look at the value of the brand. Marketing i marketingovye issledovaniya. 2002. No. 1 (27). (In Russ).
12. Aaker D. Managing Brand. Free Press. 1991. Pp.13–15.
13. Burgman R., Roos G., Ballow J. and Thomas J. No longer “Out of sight, out of mind”: Intellectual Capital Approach in AssetEconomics / BtoB Magazine. 2005. Vol. 7. Pp.10.
14. Kozyrev A.N., Makarov V.L. Otsenka stoimosti nematerial’nykh aktivov i intellektual’noi sobstvennosti. [Valuation of intangible assets and intellectual property.] Moscow: RITs GSh VS RF, 2003. 352 p. (In Russ).
15. Azgal’dov G.G., Karpova N.N. Otsenka stoimosti intellektual’noi sobstvennosti i nematerial’nykh aktivov. [Valuation of intellectual property and intangible assets]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnaya akademiya otsenki i konsaltinga, 2007. 400 p. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Kiselev B.G. Evaluation of the brand of a trading company. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2015;(4):61-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2015-4-61-70
Views:
970
Email this article 