Risk analysis of development of the urbanized territories

Problem analysis and risk evaluation of urban areas has several related aspects. Together with the relative novelty of the scientific field management of development areas, tasks of risk management in terms of urbanization have not yet received sufficient research and methodological support.

The purpose of the study is in the development and testing of an effective mechanism of analysis and evaluation of environmental and economic risks that arise in the process of realization projects of development in urban areas.

Objects of the study are ecological and economic risks specific to projects of development in urban areas and arising from the process of transformation of the natural-anthropogenic environment.

The hypothesis of the study is in adaptation principles of the method of analysis of hierarchies and application of consistent formal expert assessment of ecological and economic risks to the problems of analysis projects of development in urban areas, as a result of which it is proposed to carry out the selection of the most rational directions for practical implementation in conditions a particular urban environment.

The result of research is the author’s approach to the adaptation of the well-known and positively proven in solving multi-criteria tasks method of analysis of hierarchies to identify and assessment the risk level development of urban areas based on multi-variation risk events and different probability of their existence.

1. Smirnov A.P., Afonina D.V. Risk assessment model of the investment project when fuzzy input data are available. Ekonomika v promyshlennosti = Economy in the industry. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 78–82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2014-3-78-82

2. Vighi M. New challenges in ecological risk assessment. Integrated environmental assessment and management. 2013. No. 9(3). Pp. 1–3.

3. Suter II G.W. Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment. Risk Analysis. 2000. No. 20(2). Pp. 173–178.

4. Bartashevich A.A. Ecological and economic risks and their impact on the socio- economic situation of the country. Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2010. No. 32. Pp. 54–58. (In Russ.)

5. Reznik A.V. Organizational-economic mechanism of sustainable development of the regional administration. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya. 2015. No. 3(8). Pp. 134–138. (In Russ.)

6. Prokop’ev B.B. Approaches to the management of ecological and economic risks and methods of their financing. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo. 2013. No. 8(37). Pp. 268–271. (In Russ.)

7. Anopchenko T.Y., Murzin A.D. Economicmathematical modeling of the factors of social and environmental risk areas. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2015. No. 2(124). Pp. 17–34. (In Russ.)

8. Kolomak E.A. The development of the urban system in Russia: trends and factors . Voprosy ekonomiki. 2014. No. 10. Pp. 82–96. (In Russ.)

9. Saaty T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1977. No. 15(3). Pp. 234–281.

10. The Annual International Symposium of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. URL http://www.isahp.org

11. Saaty T.L. Prinyatie reshenii pri zavisimostyakh i obratnykh svyazyakh [Decision-making at the dependencies and feedbacks]. Moscow: LENAND, 2014. 357 p. (In Russ.)

12. Wilson R., Crouch E.A.C. Risk assessment and comparisons: An introduction. Science. 1987. No. 236(4799). Pp. 267–270.

13. Kostyukhin Y.Y., Eliseevа E.N., Tihonenko A.V. The process approach to the allocation of costs of industrial enterprise. Non-ferrous metals. 2007. No. 12. Pp. 14–20. (In Russ.)

14. Kostyukhin Y.Y., Sherstneva M.A. Business valuation as a control value of the company. Ekonomika v promyshlennosti = Economy in the industry. 2010. No. 2.Pp. 40–44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2010-2-40-44

15. Kolotyrin K.P. Ecological and economic risks in the waste management and ways to reduce them. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2016. No. 2. Pp. 195–204. (In Russ.)

16. Kolotyrin K.P. Economic instruments of stimulation of nature protection activity. Bulletin of the Saratov state technical university. 2009. No. 1(37). Pp. 186– 196. (In Russ.)

17. Peshkova M.H., Matsko N.A. The strategy of portfolio investments of mining companies. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2010. No. 4. Pp. 332–342. (In Russ.)

18. Peshkovа M.H., Shulginа O.V. Modern methods of evaluation of investment attractiveness of companies of mineral complex. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2015. No. S1. Pp. 193–208. (In Russ.)

19. Samarinа V.P. «Green Economy» Russia: Some problems in the theory and methodology. National interests priorities and safety. 2015. No. 2(287). Pp. 2–9. (In Russ.)

20. Skufina Т.P., Samarina V.P., Krachunov H., Savon D.Yu. Problems of Russia’s arctic development in the context of optimization of the mineral raw materials complex use. Eurasian mining. 2015. No. 2(24). Pp. 18–21. (In Russ.)