Preview

Russian Journal of Industrial Economics

Advanced search

Dynamic balance model the organizationaleconomic mechanism vertically-integrated structure in the defense industry

https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2017-4-322-328

Abstract

The relevance of this research lies not fully in impeccable situation [1, 2] in one of the most important issues of the reorganization of the military-industrial complex of Russia – the creation of vertically integrated structures (VIS). A vertically integrated structure (as defined in [2]) is regarded as the object of control [3]. The article describes the application of dynamic balance model to describe the interaction of enterprises within a vertically integrated structure (VIS). The applicability of the model to describe the production of VIS in the framework of production cooperation. The proposed classification of enterprises OPK on the criterion of the degree of localization of production process the final product of a vertically integrated structure. The stages of the full life cycle of the product. Marked with no alternative the inclusion in the VIS of scientific and research organizations of the corresponding profile to ensure that vertically-integrated structure of technological processes of each stage of the full life cycle. Is the use of a dynamic balance model for the formation of vertically integrated structures in the defense industry. Because decisionmaking in the economic field inevitably accompanied by the attendant effects in other fields – social, political, etc. [4], environmental factors [5], which is an economic system, vertically-integrated structure, it is necessary to consider all the factors. Dynamic balance model allows to consider (describe) all kinds of factors with a given level of detail [6]. The model allows to predict with a high degree of reliability [7, 8] the production capabilities of the industries of the military industrial complex, to take into account scientific and technical progress.

About the Authors

V. F. Mihin
National University of Science and Technology MISiS
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.)


S. S. Chevgun
National University of Science and Technology MISiS
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student


References

1. Chevgun S.S. State corporations of the military-industrial complex (mic): organizational and economic mechanism as a factor ensuring the efficiency of the industry. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seriya 1: Ehkonomika i pravo = Scientific review. Series 1: Economics and Law. 2015. No. 6. Pp. 70–74. (In Russ.)

2. No time to celebrate: Rogozin criticized the reform of the defence industry. Available at: https:// ria.ru/defense_safety/20170418/1492483303.html (accessed: 20.05.2017). (In Russ.)

3. Velichko M.V., Efimov V.V., Imanov G.M. Ehkonomika i noosfera. Nauchno-metodologicheskie osnovy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya social’no-ehkonomicheskim razvitiem v usloviyah globalizacii. Noosfernyj (ehtikoehkologicheskij) podhod [Economics and noosphere. Scientific and methodological basis of public administration socio-economic development in the context of globalization. Noosphere (ethical and environmental) approach]. St. Petersburg: MFIN, 2012. 170 p. (In Russ.)

4. Kanevcev M.V., Popova A.L. The transformation of the economic functions of the state in terms of structural changes in the economy. Innovacionnaya nauka = Innovative science. 2015. No. 7-1(7). Pp. 114–115. (In Russ.)

5. Velichko M.V., Efimov V.A., Zaznobin V.M. Ehkonomika innovacionnogo razvitiya. Upravlencheskie osnovy ehkonomicheskoj teorii [Economy innovative development. Managerial foundations of economic theory]. St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii Gosudarstvennyi Agrarnyi Universitet, 2015. 358 p. (In Russ.)

6. Pasternak P.P. Ocenki na resursy v ehkonomike [Evaluation of resources in the economy]. St. Petersburg: Prospekt Nauki, 2009. 152 p. (In Russ.)

7. Leontief W. Ehkonomicheskoe ehsse. Teorii, issledovaniya, fakty i politika [Essays in economics; Theories, theorizing, facts, and policies]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1990. 415 p. (In Russ.)

8. Okrepilov V.V. Vasiliy Leont’yev: Dokumenty. Vospominaniya. Stat’i [Vasily Leontiev: documents. Memories. Article]. St. Petersburg: Gumanistika, 2006. 294 p. (In Russ.)

9. Efimov V.A., Velichko M.V. Organizational and technological approach to macroeconomic systems – the key to the success of economic and cultural development of society. Al’manah «Klyuch» = Almanac «The Key». 2010. No. 2. Pp. 70–83. (In Russ.)

10. Velichko M.V. Principy nauchno-meto-do logicheskogo obespecheniya racional’nogo prirodopol’zovaniya v usloviyah globalizacii [Principles of scientific and methodological support of environmental management in conditions of globalization]. Innovacionnaya ehkonomika: opyt razvityh stran i uroki dlya Rossii. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii Gosudarstvennyi inzhenerno-ekonomicheskii Universitet, 2010. Pt 1. Pp. 115–122. (In Russ.)

11. Efimov V.A. Metodologiya ehkonomicheskogo obespecheniya demograficheskoj politiki ustojchivogo razvitiya [Methodology of economic security demographic policy of sustainable development]. St. Petersburg: Severo-Zapadnaya Akademiya Gosudarstvennoi sluzhby, 2007. 184 p. (In Russ.)

12. Kanevcev M.V., Popova A.L. The main functions of state regulation of economy in the social state. Simvol nauki = Symbol of Science. 2015. No. 7-1. Pp. 80–82. (In Russ.)

13. Informacionnaja spravochnaja sistema «Konsul’tant Pljus: Federal’naja sborka». Zakonodatel’stvo Rossijskoj Federacii [Information reference system «Consultant Plus: Federal Assembly. The Legislation of the Russian Federation]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/about/software/cons/zakonodatelstvo (accessed: 20.12.2017). (In Russ.)

14. Mikhin V.F. Organization of effective management. Metallurg. 2005. No. 12. Pp. 13–14. (In Russ.)

15. Alatartseva E.A. The crisis of the growth economy as a system: cause and effect. Vestnik nauki Sibiri = Bulletin of Siberian Science. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 11–22. (In Russ.)

16. Leontief W. Mezhotraslevaya ehkonomika [Interbranch economy]. Moscow: Ehkonomika, 1997. 479 p. (In Russ.)

17. Kostyukhin Yu.Yu., Zhdankin N.A., Larionova I.S., Rozhkov I.M., Savon D.Yu., Skryabin O.O., Shilov O.V., Zaitsev I.M., Stepaniuc N.B., Trofimova N.A. Imperativy ehffektivnosti proizvodstva [The imperatives of production efficiency]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom «MISIS», 2016. 91 p. (In Russ.)

18. Alatartseva E.A. Ekonomicheskiy rost ili ekonomicheskoe razvitie? [Economic growth or economic development?]. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye nauki: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee». Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom «Ekonomicheskaya gazeta», 2014. Pp. 104–111.

19. Rozhkov I.M., Larionova I.A., Skryabin O.O., Trofimova N.A., Zaitsev I.M. Optimization of the relative volume and structure of resources. Stal’ = Steel. 2016. No. 11. Pp. 65–68. (In Russ.)

20. Dostatochno obshchaya teoriya upravleniya. Postanovochnye materialy uchebnogo kursa fakulteta prikladnoy matematiki i protsessov upravleniya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [General theory of management. Staged materials of a training course of the Faculty of applied mathematics and control processes, St. Petersburg State University]. Moscow, Kontseptual, 2012. 416 p. (In Russ.)

21. Shatilov N.F. Modelirovanie rasshirennogo vosproizvodstva [Modeling expanded reproduction]. Moscow, Ehkonomika, 1967. 175 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Mihin V.F., Chevgun S.S. Dynamic balance model the organizationaleconomic mechanism vertically-integrated structure in the defense industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2017;10(4):322-328. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2017-4-322-328

Views: 785


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-1633 (Print)
ISSN 2413-662X (Online)