Methodical aspects problems of harmonization of interests within the framework of the challenge of the selection of the strategic priorities of regional development

The article explores the problem of forming strategies for the development of territorial socioeconomic systems based on the interaction of differentlevel economic agents. The study proposes the development of a model tool for territorial development based on the formalization of the principles of interaction between different-level economic agents and the mechanisms for managing their behavior with a view to forming an agreed vector of strategic development of territorial socio-economic systems. A general scheme for the functioning of the territorial socio-economic system from the point of view of forming and realizing the interests of agents is proposed, and key stages of this process are highlighted. The characteristics that make it possible to classify interests are considered. The review of approaches to the coordination of interests of economic agents is carried out, their opportunities and restrictions are revealed.

A conceptual model of coordinating the interests of economic agents based on ranking the priority and degree of realization of the key interests of agents using the fuzzy logic apparatus is proposed and allows to formulate an acceptable set of solutions of varying degree of consistency («soft» solutions) in the situation when counterparts can not reach an unequivocally agreed decision. Within the framework of implementation of fuzzy logic methods, appropriate linguistic variables and interval values are proposed to determine these terms. An approach is proposed to determine the degree of coherence of counterparties’ interests. Based on the results of assessing the level of coherence of interests of economic agents, two decisions can be obtained: 1) the level of coherence of interests is sufficient for the realization of interests; 2) the level of coherence of interests is insufficient and requires the adjustment of some parameters. The most interesting is the option, implying the formation of concessions, since it is in this case that there is a direct coordination of the interests of economic agents. The criteria for the formation of the corresponding fuzzy rules are proposed. The implementation of this algorithm will allow to obtain a pair of coordinated interests of agents by forming mutual concessions or to reveal the impossibility of such a solution to the problem.

1. Avdeev Yu.M. Research work as an important component of the formation of professional competencies. Territoriya innovatsii. 2018. No. 3(19). Pp. 66–71. (In Russ.)

2. Schneider L., Lazarus M., Lee C., van Asselt H. Restricted linking of emissions trading systems: options, benefits, and challenges. International Environmental Agreements: Politic, Law and Economics. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 6. Pp. 883–898. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-017-9370-0

3. Pobotovsky V.A. Foreign experience of complex development of regions. Regionologiya = Regional Studies. 1994. No. 2–3. Pp. 149–156. (In Russ.)

4. Yakunin A.M. Models of interaction of economic agents in conditions of asymmetric information structure. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta im. akademika S.P. Koroleva (natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo universiteta) = Vestnik of the Samara State Aerospace University. 2012. No. 6(37). Pp. 157–165. (In Russ.)

5. Larichev O.I Properties of the Decision Methods in the Multicriteria Problems of Individual Choice. Avtomatika i telemekhanika. 2002. No. 2. Pp. 146–158. (In Russ)

6. Chikunova E.V. Individual interest and common good: the problem of harmonization. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series Humanities. 2008. No. 8(64). Pp. 304–309. (In Russ.)

7. Khrustalev O.E. Financial methods of the economic interests coordination of theinvestment projects. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and financial analysis. 2011. No. 3. Pp. 329–334. (In Russ.)

8. Filipchenko A.M. Conflict and balance of interests of economic agents. Transportnoe delo Rossii = Transport business in Russia. 2011. No. 10. Pp. 137–139. (In Russ.)

9. Gainanov D.A., Zakirov I.D. Mekhanizm vzaimodeistviya ekonomicheskikh agentov v sisteme upravleniya raznourovnevymi sotsial’noekonomicheskimi sistemami [The mechanism of interaction of economic agents in the management system of different-level socio-economic systems]. Information Technologies for Intelligence Decision Making Support (ITIDS’2015): Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference. Ufa: USATU, 2015. Pp. 164–168. (In Russ.)

10. Novikov D.A., Petrakov S.N. Kurs teorii aktivnykh sistem [Course of the theory of active systems]. Moscow: SINTEG, 1999. 108 p. (In Russ.)

11. Nizamutdinov M.M., Oreshnikov V.V. Instrumentarii prognozirovaniya izmeneniya parametrov regional’nogo razvitiya na osnove adaptivnoimitatsionnogo podkhoda [Toolkit for predicting changes in the parameters of regional development on the basis of the adaptive-imitational approach]. Information Technologies for Intelligent Decision Making Support (ITIDS’2015): Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference. Ufa: USATU, 2015. Pp. 211–215. (In Russ.)

12. Mazur I., Shapiro V. Not boring management. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies. 2004. No. 4. Pp. 110–112. (In Russ.)

13. Vasilyeva O.N. Modeli i metody material’nogo stimulirovaniya (teoriya i praktika) [Models and methods of material incentives (theory and practice)]. Moscow: LENAND, 2007. 288 p. (In Russ.)

14. Zhelezova E., Izmalkov S., Sonin K., Khovanskaya I. Theory and practice of bilateral markets (Nobel Prize in Economics 2012). Voprosy ekonomiki = Issues of economics. 2013. No. 1. Pp. 4–26. (In Russ.)

15. Grabbe H., Meyer H., Valiante D. Citizens’ Europe: Crowded out by economic focus. Intereconomics. 2012. Vol. 47. No. 5. Pp. 268–281. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-0120428-5

16. Niyazova A.N., Suleimenov M.K., Ilyassova K.M., Kaziyeva G.T., Sarina S.A. Land proprietary rights and limitations in private and public interests. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 3. Pp. 584–589. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v7.3(17).14

17. Zinchenko A.B. Teoriya poleznosti fon NeimanaMorgenshterna i raschet optimal’nykh portfelei dlya razlichnykh modelei finansovykh rynkov: uchebnoe posobie. [Von Neumann-Morgenstern’s theory of utility and calculation of optimal portfolios for various models of financial markets: a tutorial]. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University, 2007. 69 p.

18. Novikov D.A. Mechanisms of stimulation as a tool for coordinating the interests of participants in organizational systems. Upravlenie innovatsiyami i strategiya innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossii = Innovation management and innovation development strategy in Russia. 2007. No. 1. Pp. 43–55. (In Russ.)

19. Granberg A.G., Suslov V.I., Suspitsyn S.A. Economic and mathematical research of multi-regional systems. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 120–150. (In Russ.)

20. Hadžića A.P., Jugovića A., Perićb M. Criteria for the management of partnership in the croatian seaports. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja.. 2015. Vol. 28. No. 1. Pp. 226–242. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2015.1041775

21. Capriglione F., Ginevri A.S. Politics and finance in the european union. Law and Economics Yearly Review. 2015. Vol. 4. Pp. 4–109.

22. The Arrow paradox. Available at: https://mipt.ru/dcam/students/books/publ/erroy.php (accessed: 10.06.2016). (In Russ.)

23. Nizamutdinov M.M., Oreshnikov V.V. Determination of the parameters of regional development management on the basis of fuzzy logic algorithms. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods.. 2016. Vol. 52. No. 2. Pp. 30–39. (In Russ.).

24. Pechatkin V.V., Kobzeva A.Yu. Cognitive model of the influence of elements of the innovation system on the reproduction process in the region. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Basic research. 2017. No. 9–1. Pp. 222– 227. (In Russ.)