The Russian industry: the problems and the further development (ending)
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-3-226-234
Abstract
This article describes the various approaches to the analysis of the current situation and the justification of the further development prospects of the Russian industry represented at the round table on June 21,2018 inthe State Duma of Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on a subject: «Legislative providing industrial policy of the Russian Federation: technologies, innovations, investments». Attention had also been drawn to issues requiring the globalization, the industrial development inequality of the countries of the world and the Russian regions, the dependences of economic growth on the state of the knowledge economy, the industrial and monetary and credit policy interrelations, the changes in the system of the state regulation of the Russian industry, the business moods, the technological updating results of the industrial enterprises, the features of the investment projects financing in Russia and in industrialized countries, the prospects of the introduction in Russia of the digital technologies of the industrial production management. Among offers of the situation significant improvement there are: the providing for the economic relations participants of the equal competitive opportunities; the completion of the Federal law «About Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation», the involvement in the economy of free money, the updating on the basis of the problems settlement with the financing of the enterprises of the fixed assets, the selective development of the import substitution, the distribution of the positive experience of the successful industrial companies. The author points to a need of the involvement in the discussion and the other important questions concerning the comprehensive analysis of the reasons of the serious lag of the Russian enterprises from the enterprises of the industrialized countries generating the negative consequences; the labor productivity at the industrial enterprises of the different countries of the world and factors of its growth; the influences of the developed bureaucracy, the administrative barriers, the corruption on a situation in the various industries, the applications of the concept of the economical production, the energy productivity and a resource conservation, etc.
Keywords
About the Author
E. E. Rumyantseva
The Economic Policy and Business Center LTD
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr . Sci . (Econ .), Professor
39 Syreneviy Bul’var, Moscow 105215
References
1. Podenok A. «We creep in system crisis». Available at: http://www.stoletie.ru/obschestvo/andrej_podenok_my_vpolzajem_v_sistemnyj_krizis_829.htm (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
2. Doklad o sostoyanii konkurencii v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2016 g. [Report on the state of competition in the Russian Federation in 2016]. Moscow: Federal`naya antimonopol`naya sluzhba, 2017. 739 p. (In Russ.)
3. Mereminskaya E. The state and state companies control 70 % of the Russian economy. FAS recognized the state by the main enemy of the competition. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2016/09/29/658959-goskompaniikontroliruyut-ekonomiki (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
4. Shilova L.F., Mikhaylov E.E. Causes of overdue receivables and its prevention. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye i pravovyye issledovaniya = Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research. 2012. No. 11. Pp. 153–158. (In Russ.)
5. Money strengthens a brain. How many and as earn the American universities. Available at: https://lenta.ru/articles/2013/10/22/universities/ (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
6. Sokolov P. Metal paradox: cost of production from Norilsk Nickel is minus $ 12,000 per 1 ton. How is this possible? Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/partner/articles/2017/11/02/740304-metallicheskiiparadoks (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
7. Trubin V., Nikolaeva N., Paleeva M., Khasainova A. Proizvoditel'nost' truda v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Sotsial'nyi byulleten'. Vypusk No. 9. Iyun' 2017 g. [Labor productivity in the Russian Federation. Social bulletin. Issue No. 9. June, 2017]. Moscow: Analiticheskii tsentr pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2017. 43 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kutukova E.S. About some approaches to labor productivity assessment in the modern Russian economy. Gosudarstvennyi audit. Pravo. Ekonomika = Journal of Research and Practice State Audit. 2017. No. 3–4. Pp 129– 135. (In Russ.)
9. Rogozin: in space, Russia has lagged behind the United States 9 times. Available at: https://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2758578 (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
10. Kudrov V. Mezhdunarodnye ekonomicheskie sopostavleniya i problemy innovatsionnogo razvitiya [International economic comparisons and problems of innovative development]. Moscow: Yustitsinform, 2011. 616 p. (In Russ.)
11. Bakatina D., Dyuv'esar Zh.-P., Klintsov V. Krogmann K., Remes Ya., Solzhenitsyn E., Shvakman I. Effektivnaya Rossiya Proizvoditel'nost' kak fundament rosta [Effective Russia Productivity as base of growth]. Moscow: McKinsey Global Institute, 2009. 46 p. (In Russ.)
12. Tikhonov E. How to wake sleeping. Experts about the task set by the president – to increase labor productivity in twelve years four times. Available at: https://rg.ru/2008/02/26/a210835.html (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
13. Koroleva A. It's time to take up the productivity of labor. Available at: http://expert.ru/2015/05/8/poravzyatsya-za-proizvoditelnost/ (accessed: 05.09.2018) (In Russ.)
14. Vladimir Putin's message to Federal Assembly. Putin has charged to provide growth rates of labor productivity in Russia not lower than 5 % a year. TASS. March 1, 2018. Available at: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/4998739 (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
15. Filobokova L.Yu., Vdovichenko M.M. Regional industrial policy and mechanism of her management. Ekonomika v promyshlennosti = Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 75–81. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2017-1-075-081
16. Manturov D.V. State regulation in the sphere of industry within 25 years. Part 1. Industry of 1990s. Public Administration Issues. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 31–48. (In Russ.)
17. Manturov D.V. State regulation in the sphere of industry within 25 years. Industry in 2000-2009. Public Administration Issues. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 99–116. (In Russ.)
18. Manturov D.V. The state as an investor: a shift in the role of a state in financing industry in the past 20 years. Economic Revival of Russia. 2017. No. 2. Pp. 4–16. (In Russ).
19. Chen Y., Cui C., Yang T., Zhang X. Political favouritism and investment efficiency. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2018. Vol. 51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.08.012
20. Dreher A., Klasen S., Vreeland J.R., Werker E. The Costs of Favoritism: Is Politically Driven Aid Less Effective? Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2013. Vol. 62. No. 1. Pp. 157–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.08.012
21. Ding Y., Wang L., Li Y., Li D. Model predictive control and its application in agriculture: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018. Vol. 151. Pp. 104–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.004
22. Handbook of Farm, Dairy and Food Machinery Engineering. New York: Myer Kutz Associates, Inc., 2013. 735 p.
23. López-Lapeña O., Pallas-Areny R. Solar energy radiation measurement with a low–power solar energy harvester. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018. Vol. 151. Pp. 150–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.011
24. Yang C., Everitt J.H., Murden D. Evaluating high resolution SPOT 5 satellite imagery for crop identification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2011. Vol. 75. No. 2. Pp. 347–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.12.012
25. Suárez Fernández-Miranda S., Marcos M., Peralta M.E., Aguayo F. The challenge of integrating Industry 4.0 in the degree of Mechanical Engineering. Procedia Manufacturing. 2017. Vol. 13. Pp. 1229–1236. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.039
26. Patrício D.I., Rieder R. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in precision agriculture for grain crops: A systematic review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018. Vol. 153. Pp. 69–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.001
27. Mark L., Degani A. Design of a Task-Based Modular Re-Configurable Agricultural Robot. IFACPapersOnLine. 2016. Vol. 49. No. 16. Pp. 184–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.034
28. Shujun L. Development of Farm machinery in China. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2013. Vol. 46. No. 4. Pp. 9–10. DOI: 10.3182/20130327-3-JP-3017.00005
29. Papageorgiou A. Agricultural Equipment in Greece: Farm Machinery Management in the Era of Economic Crisis. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2015. Vol. 7. Pp. 98–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.017
30. Mottaleb K.A., Krupnik T.J., Erenstein O. Factors associated with small-scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings. Journal of Rural Studies. 2016. Vol. 46. Pp. 155–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.012
31. Palšová L., Schwarczová L., Schwarcz P., Bandlerová A. The Support of Implementation of Organic Farming in the Slovak Republic in the Context of Sustainable Development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 110. Pp. 520–529. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.896
32. Febles-González J.M., Tolón-Becerra A., LastraBravo X., Acosta-Valdés X. Cuban agricultural policy in the last 25 years. From conventional to organic agriculture. Land Use Policy. 2011. Vol. 28. No. 4. Pp. 723–735. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.12.008
33. Popova N. Fashion-industriya has reached a deadlock: Burberry has destroyed production for 36 million dollars. Fashion United. Available at: https://fashionunited.ru/novostee/beeznyes/feshn-industriya-zashlav-tupik-burberry-unichtozhila-produktsiyu-na-36-mlndollarov/2018071922566 (accessed: 05.09.2018). (In Russ.)
34. Dalenogare L.S., Benitez G.B., Ayala, N.F., Frank A.G. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018. Vol. 204. Pp. 383–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019
Review
For citations:
Rumyantseva E.E. The Russian industry: the problems and the further development (ending). Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2018;11(3):226-234. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-3-226-234
Views:
1270
Email this article 