Sustainable development of the Russian industrial complex in modern conditions
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-3-235-241
Abstract
The article considers the evolution of the term «sustainable development» in the context of the United Nations (UN), identifies inaccuracies and contradictions. The paper investigates the reflection of the UN concept of sustainable development in the national legislation of Russia, reveals the high variability of the used combinations of the terms «sustainability», «development», and the lack of definitions, limiting the understanding and the possibility of application of the considered norms. It is proposed to consider people as an economic category separately from the factors of production, since such categories as labor; management, scientific, entrepreneurial, intuitive and creative abilities; goodwill – are unique characteristics of the person, due to socio-cultural, medical, biological and environmental factors. On the basis of consideration of interrelations in the system «biosphere-society-stateeconomy-industrial complex «the author's definitions of the terms» sustainable development of the militaryindustrial complex (MIC) «in the broad and narrow sense,»the mechanism of sustainable development of the MIC» are proposed. The term «sustainable development» in relation to the functioning of the military-industrial complex (MIC) is understood by us as the ability of the defense industry system to achieve its goals indefinitely, to develop integrity and improve, while having the ability to resist the external influence that prevents it. The mechanism of sustainable development of the military-industrial complex, including the algorithm of sustainable development and levels of sustainability. The absence of applicable to the military-industrial complex techniques, methods, criteria, measures and standards of sustainability of development is revealed, the system of characteristics is proposed. It is proposed to use predictive-corrective management method for sustainable development of the defense industry, as providing the highest quality. The necessity of transition to a new social paradigm of understanding the role of the economy in the considered system of interrelations.
About the Authors
V. F. Mihin
National University of Science and Technology «MISiS»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand . Sci . (Eclon .)
4 Leninsky Prospect, Moscow 119049
S. S. Chevgun
National University of Science and Technology «MISiS»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student
4 Leninsky Prospect, Moscow 119049
References
1. Velichko M.V., Efimov V.A., Zaznobin V.M. Ekonomika innovatsionnogo razvitiya. Upravlencheskie osnovy ekonomicheskoi teorii [Economy innovative development. Managerial foundations of economic theory]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Agrarian University, 2015. 358 p. (In Russ.)
2. Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.A. Sistemnaya sbalansirovannost' ehkonomiki [System balance of the economy]. Moscow: Izd-vo «Nauchnaya biblioteka», 2017. 319 p. (In Russ.)
3. Efimov V.A., Velichko M.V., Zaznobin V.M. Credit and financial system as an instrument of macroeconomic management. Vestnik akademii = Bulletin of the Academy. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 189–193. (In Russ.)
4. Zhigailo V.V. Mechanism of interaction between the state and the private sector of the economy. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economics. 2011. No. 75. Pp. 59–62. (In Russ.)
5. Information reference system «Consultant Plus: Federal Assembly». The Legislation Of The Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/online/ (accessed: 10.08.2018). (In Russ.)
6. Efimov V.A. Metodologiya ehkonomicheskogo obespecheniya demograficheskoj politiki ustojchivogo razvitiya [Methodology of economic security demographic policy of sustainable development]. St. Petersburg: NorthWestern Academy of State Service, 2007. 184 p. (In Russ.)
7. Chevgun S.S. State corporations of the militaryindustrial complex (MIC): Organizational and economic mechanism as a factor ensuring the efficiency of the industry. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seriya 1. Ekonomika i pravo = Scientific Review. Series 1. Economics and Law. 2015. No. 6. Pp. 70–74. (In Russ.)
8. Armashova-Telnik G.S., Kanavtsev M.V., Serditov V.A. Marketing of innovations as a factor of productivity growth economic activity of the enterprise. Aktual'nye problemy ehkonomiki i upravleniya = Actual problems of economy and management. 2018. No. 1(17). Pp. 27–32. (In Russ.)
9. Mihin V.F., Chevgun S.S. Dynamic balance model of organizational and economic mechanism of vertically integrated structure in the defense industry. Ekonomika v promyshlennosti = Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2017. No. 4. Pp. 50–55. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/20721633-2017-4-322-328
10. Kuzyk B.N. Rossiya v civilizacionnom izmerenii: fundamental'nye osnovy strategii innovacionnogo razvitiya [Russia in the civilizational dimension: the fundamentals of the strategy of innovative development]. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies, 2008. 862 p. (In Russ.)
11. Kanavcev M.V., Popova A.L. The transformation of the economic functions of the state in terms of structural changes in the economy. Innovacionnaya nauka = Innovative science. 2015. No. 7-1(7). Pp. 114–115. (In Russ.)
12. Nuttunen P. A. On some approaches to the formation of a balanced scorecard of indicative planning. Izvestiya Mezhdunarodnoj akademii agrarnogo obrazovaniya = News of the International Academy of agricultural education. 2008. Vol. 2. No. 7. Pp. 41–47. (In Russ.)
13. Kostyukhin Yu.Yu., Zhdankin N.A., Larionova I.A., Rozhkov I.M., Savon D.Yu., Skryabin O.O., Shilov O.V., Zaitsev I.M., Stepanyuk N.B., Trofimova N.A. Imperativy ehffektivnosti proizvodstva [The imperatives of production efficiency]. Moscow: Izd-vo MISIS, 2016. 91 p. (In Russ.)
14. Tyslenko A.G. Menedzhment. Organizacionnye struktury upravleniya: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie [Management. Organizational management structures: teaching and practical guide]. Moscow: Alpha-Press, 2011. 319 p. (In Russ.)
15. Dostatochno obshchaya teoriya upravleniya. Postanovochnye materialy uchebnogo kursa fakulteta prikladnoy matematiki i protsessov upravleniya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Graduating materials of the training course of the Faculty of Applied Mathematics – Management Processes of the St. Petersburg State University (1997–2003)]. Novosibirsk: PIK VINITI, 2003. 394 p. (In Russ.)
16. Zeinalov G.G. The philosophical meaning of the concept of sustainable development. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie = Humanities and education. 2011. No. 1. Pp. 51–56. (In Russ.)
17. Golubev M.P. Wanting the best. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic strategy. 2004. No. 3. Pp. 86–87. (In Russ.)
18. Kanavcev M.V., Popova A.L. The main functions of state regulation of economy in the social state. Simvol nauki = Symbol of Science. 2015. No. 7–1. Pp. 80–82. (In Russ.)
19. Rozhkov I.M., Larionova I.A., Skryabin O.O., Trofimova N.A., Zaitsev I.M. Optimization of the relative volume and structure of resources. Stal' = Steel. 2016. No. 11. Pp. 65–68. (In Russ.)
20. Hlutkov A.D. Geopolitical aspects of national security of Russia. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chuvash University. 2008. No. 1. Pp. 543–550. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mihin V.F., Chevgun S.S. Sustainable development of the Russian industrial complex in modern conditions. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2018;11(3):235-241. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-3-235-241
Views:
832
Email this article 