Problems and prospects for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific activity in the chemical-technological field

In modern conditions, the nature of scientific activity in the chemical and technological field is changed radically. Therefore, it is particularly relevant to implement an effective scientific and technical policy in this area in order to reduce the level of risk of the negative impact of hazardous chemical factors on the population and the environment. For a deeper understanding of the problems associated with the evolution of research and development in the chemical-technological field, the development of the issues of determining the effectiveness of scientific activity was applied in relation to the assessment of basic and applied research. The features of the development of science in the chemical-technological field in modern conditions are highlighted. A review of methods for determining the effectiveness of research and development is presented, and methodological problems are discussed. The specificity of determining the effectiveness of fundamental and applied scientific research in the chemical and technological field is highlighted. The problems of operational and long-term planning of research and development are investigated. The features of the expansion of research in the field of chemical technology are revealed. The problems of increasing the resource-intensiveness of research and development, staffing and optimization of training mechanisms for graduates of rare specialties in the chemical-technological field are investigated. Scientific and methodological approaches are proposed for determining the effectiveness of scientific activity in the chemical and technological field. Efficiency evaluation criteria are developed, which take into account the internal effects and externalities of scientific activities in the chemical and technological field. Efficiency is proposed to be evaluated according to three groups of criteria, internal efficiency, external efficiency and structural efficiency. Since the main part of the information can only be obtained through examination, the problems of obtaining and processing expert information are highlighted and ways of solving them are outlined.

1. Varshavsky A.E. Science-intensive Sector and High Technologies in Russian Economy. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2000. No. 2. Pp. 61-83. (In Russ.)

2. Eliseev Yu.S., Saushkin B.P. The state and prospects of development of high technologies of machine-building production. Metalloobrabotka = Metalworking, 2010. No. 2(56). Pp. 9-17. (In Russ.)

3. Stepanova E.Yu. The high technology branches and high technologies are the basis of technological security and independence of the country. Fundamental’nye i prikladnye problemy tekhniki i tekhnologii = Fundamental and applied problems of engineering and technology. 2014. No. 2(304). Pp. 122-132. (In Russ.)

4. Barabonova I.M., Koshkina M.G., Savitskaya T.V., Egorov A.F. Main stages of analysis and risk assessment of a university chemical-technological. Uspekhi v khimii i khimicheskoi tekhnologii = JournalAdnvances in Chemistry and Chemical Technology. 2007. Vol. 21. No. 1(69). Pp. 92-95. (In Russ.)

5. Pronichkin S.V., Raevskaya E.G., Tikhonov I.P. Experience in organizing and guiding comprehensive expertise of results of scientific and technical program. Khimicheskaya bezopasnost’ = Chemical Safety Science. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 2(1), Pp. 147-157. (In Russ.)

6. Pronichkin S.V., Tikhonov I.P. Development of criteria and methodological approaches to assessment of effectiveness of expert scientific organizations. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National interests: priorities and security. 2013. Vol. 9. No. 37(226). Pp. 13-19. (In Russ.)

7. Pronichkin S.V., Tikhonov I.P. Assessment of productivity of activity of the scientific organizations. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2014. No. 3(354). Pp. 27-32. (In Russ.)

8. Varshavsky A.E. On the strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian economy. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economics. 2017. No. 6. Pp. 5-27. (In Russ.)

9. Lukashov V.N., Lukashov N.V., Slepinina A.K. Analysis of the major trends in the economic evaluation of basic research. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2016. No. 9(215). Pp. 55-61. (In Russ.)

10. Mindeli L.E., Chernykh S.I. Funding of basic research in Russia: Modern realities and forecasts. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting. 2016. No. 3(156). Pp. 111-122. (In Russ.)

11. Leonov A.V., Pronin A.Yu. Prioritizing the areas of basic research for the creation of high-technological products. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National interests: priorities and security. 2017. Vol. 13. No. 6(351). Pp. 1004-1017. (In Russ.)

12. Demiric M., Audretsch D. Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 2017. Vol. 46. No. 9. Pp. 1681-1691. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004

13. Bryan K., Lemus J. The direction of innovation. Journal of Economic Theory. 2017. Vol. 172. Pp. 247-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2017.09.005

14. Havas A., Weber K. The fit between forwardlooking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. Vol. 115. Pp. 327-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.tech-fore.2016.07.016

15. Panteleeva K.O. Key approaches and methods for planning new product at the stage of research and experimental-design developments. European Social Science Journal. 2013. No. 10-2(37). Pp. 442-450. (In Russ.)

16. Zehavi A., Brenit D. Distribution sensitive innovation policies. Research Policy, 2017. Vol. 46. No. 1. Pp. 327-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.007

17. Pronichkin S.V., Tikhonov I.P., Sakharova N.A., Roshhin A.V. Development of criterial model for evaluation of innovative potential of results of modern scientific and technical programs. Khimicheskaya bezopasnost’ = Chemical Safety Science. 2017. No. 1(1). Pp. 256-265. (In Russ.)

18. Pronichkin S.V. Nakoplennyj potencial i per-spektivy razvitiya grantovoj formy podderzhki nauki [Accumulated potential and prospects for the development of a grant form of science support]. Processing of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference «Improving the system of interaction between the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the subjects of the Russian Federation in matters of regional and youth competitions». Moscow: Izdatel’stvo RFFI, 2016. Pp. 140-143. (In Russ.)

19. Chicherin L.P., Shepin V.O. Towards the modernization of program-target planning of research in Russia. Byulleten’ Natsional’nogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta obshchestvennogo zdorov’ya imeni N.A. Semashko = Bulletin of the National Research Institute of Public Health named after N.A. Semashko. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 154-158. (In Russ.)

20. Gudkova А.А. Development of the program-target method of research and development planning. Innovatika i ehkspertiza: nauchnye trudy = Innovation and Expertise: Scientific Works. 2014. No. 1(12). Pp. 121-130. (In Russ.)

21. Semirkhanova O.N. «Tree of goals» as a way to develop targeted programs in the agro-industrial complex. Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University. 2010. No. 1(63). Pp. 106-109.

22. Saaty T.L. Time dependent decision-making dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2007. Vol. 46. No. 7-8. Pp. 860-891. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.028

23. Smedt P., Borch K., Fuller T. Future scenarios to inspire innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2013. Vol. 80. No. 3. Pp. 432-443. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.006

24. Larichev O.I. Verbal’nyj analiz reshenij [Verbal analysis of decisions]. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 181 p. (In Russ.)

25. Varshavsky A.E. The main problems of assessing the resultativeness and effectiveness of scientific organizations. Kontseptsii = Concepcii. 2015. No. 1(33). Pp. 3-8. (In Russ.)

26. Zibareva I.V. Bibliometric evaluation of organization scientific output: problems and their solutions. Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostei. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa = Territory of new opportunities. Bulletin of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. 2012. No. 4(17). Pp. 148-156. (In Russ.)