Production backlog of the enterprise as basis of development of ecosystems of innovations

Subject/subject. The present stage of development of the Russian Federation assumes active consideration of questions of forming and development of ecosystems in the innovation sphere. It is dictated by activation of the innovation capacity of the country, taking into account the available industrial production and technology base and the solution of nation-wide tasks in the field of import substitution and increase in industrial volume of release of hi-tech products.

In this regard questions of the description, analysis and development of ecosystems of innovations purchase the special importance in the field of orientation of the existing industrial capacities on the solution of nationwide tasks.

Purposes/tasks. Development of the existing theoretical base and methodical providing in the innovation sphere regarding creation and development of ecosystems assumes the analysis of modern practical experience in the field of management of similar systems.

The purpose of this scientific article is the analysis of the importance of the existing production reserve in development of ecosystems of innovations.

For disclosure and achievement of an effective objective it is expedient to solve a number of problems:

1. To create graphic model of external and internal aspects of an ecosystem of innovations.

2. To carry out the analysis of indicators of the innovation activity of the enterprises of the Russian Federation.

3. To offer recommendations about application in practice of ecosystems of innovations.

Methodology. In article methods and tools of the complex analysis on the basis of systematization of theoretical provisions and practical material found application. In article the graphic model of external and internal aspects of an ecosystem of innovations is provided. During forming and representation of graphic model system and analytical approaches found the application.

Results. Classification of external and internal factors of ecosystems of innovations, the graphic model of ecosystems of innovations reflecting made factors recommendations about development of ecosystems of innovations in relation to the enterprises of the industrial sphere became results of this scientific article.

Conclusions/importance. Conclusions have practical character regarding determination of the directions of scientific and technical development of the enterprises. The importance is defined by a possibility of the further analysis of the list of essential factors of ecosystems of innovations, adaptations and applications of analysis results in practical activities of the enterprises.

1. ECONET. The innovation ecosystem of the Netherlands. Available at: https://econet.ru/articles/70299-innovatsionnaya-ekosistema-niderlandov(accessed: 06.11.2018). (In Russ.)

2. Mirovitskaya N., Ascher W. Guide to Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy. Durham (NC, USA): Duke University Press, 2001.391 p. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892903250311

3. Billgren C., Holmen H. Approaching Reality: Comparing Stakeholder Analysis and Cultural Theory in the Context of Natural Resource Management. Land Use Ppolicy. 2008. Vol. 25. No. 4. Pp. 550-562. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.004

4. Vogel D. Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California management review. 2005. Vol. 47. No. 4. Pp. 19-45. DOI: 10.2307/41166315

5. Russell M.G., Huhtamaki J. S., Yu C. Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration. Conference: Triple Helix IX International Conference: «Silicon Valley: Global Model or Unique Anomaly?». At Stanford (California, USA), 2011.

6. Open-end fund of investments. Available at: https://vk.com/openinvestment (accessed: 06.11.2018). (In Russ.)

7. Kopeykina L. An ecosystem for the innovation business. The Angelinvestor. 2008. No. 1 (7). Pp. 10-13. (In Russ.)

8. Forum «Ecosystem of innovations». Available at: http://innovation360.ru/ (accessed: 06.11.2018). (In Russ.)

9. Science and Innovation. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/science/ (accessed: 06.11.2018) . (In Russ.)

10. South Korea uses holding chaebols for support of small business. Financial Times. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/management/articles/2015/07/03/599080-yuzhnaya-koreya-ispolzuet-holdingi-cheboli-dlya-podderzhki-malogo-biznesa (accessed: 06.11.2018). (In Russ.)

11. The strategy of economic safety of the Russian Federation until 2030. (It is approved as the Presidential decree of the Russian Federation from 13.05.2017 No. 208). Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71572608/ (accessed: 06.11.2018). (In Russ.)

12. Ustinov A.E. Upravlenie intellektual’noi sobstvennost’yu Tom. Chast’ 1. Kommertsializatsiya nauchnoi deyatel’nosti [Intellectual Property Management Tom. Part 1. Commercialization of scientific activity]. Kazan: OOO «Nauchno-issledovatelsky institut otraslevogo upravleniya», 2017. 102 p. (In Russ.)

13. Townsend A., Pang A., Weddle R. Future Knowledge Ecosystems. The Next Twenty Years of Technology-Led Economic Development. IFTF Report Number SR-12361. Available at: http://www.iftf.org/uploads/media/SR-1236%20Future%20Knowledge%20Ecosystems.pdf (accessed: 06.11.2018) . (In Russ.)

14. Tsukanova O.A., Dubitskaya E.A. Definition of rational approaches of commercialization the results of innovative research in Russia. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Basic research. 2015. No. 5-2. Pp. 451455. (In Russ.)

15. Porter M.E., Ketels C. Clusters and Industrial Districts: Common Roots, Different Perspectives. A Handbook of Industrial Districts. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2009.

16. OECD. Maximising the benefits of R&D tax incentives for innovation. OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Available at: https://ru.scribd.com/document/177139041/Maximising-the-benefits-of-R-D-tax-incentives-for-innovation (accessed: 06.11.2018) .

17. Finnish global startup-ekosystem. Available at: https://finland.fi/ru/biznes-i-innovatsii/finskaya-globalnaya-startap-ekosiste/ (accessed: 06.11.2018). (In Russ.)

18. Smorodinskaya N.V. Network innovation ecosystems and their role in dynamicizing of economic growth. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2014. No. 7(189). Pp. 27-33. (In Russ.)

19. Mercan B., Goktas D. Components of Innovation Ecosystems: A Cross Country Study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 2011. Vol. 76. No. 16. Pp. 102-112.

20. Ranga M. Building University-Industry-Government Alliances for Innovative. Regional Ecosystems Conference «Connecting Colombia: Development from Innovation». Bogota, 2011.