Preview

Russian Journal of Industrial Economics

Advanced search

Innovative potential on the regions of the Central Federal District: assessment of the main tendencies and prospects for future development

https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2019-4-443-454

Abstract

Actuality of the innovational potential formation of the regions was revealed in the article. Problems of the innovational development of regions of the Central Federal District were emphasized. Volume indexes of goods, works, services, charges for innovations were distinguished. Reasons for differences in the innovational activity indexes of the regions were estimated. The leading regions were shown, and the dynamic of index changes were presented as well. On the basis of the performed analysis it was revealed, that both objective factors, that are connected with geographic locations, source of raw materials, operation of large enterprises, and subjective factors, such as investment volume, budget volume and structure, politics, realized by local government make great impact on the innovational development of the regions. Statistical evaluation of the innovational activity of the Central Federal District regions was given in the article as well. Differentiation analysis and analysis of imbalance degree in the structure of total volume of innovational goods, works and services were estimated with the help of integral coefficient of K. Gatev and Salai index. Evaluation method of regional innovation activity is based on the comparison of the innovation activity of the organizations in each region with the same index overall the Russian Federation. Constituent members of the Central Federal District were grouped on the basis of aggregate index of innovation activity. It was revealed, that the aggregate index of innovational activity in Bryansk Region decreased in 2017 and the region transferred into the group with lower bound of this index. Belgorod Region and Moscow Region improved their performance, transferring into the group with maximal bound of the index. Also directions of activation and perfection of innovational sphere of the region were suggested in the research.

About the Authors

E. V. Emelyanova
Kaluga branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Evgeniya V. Emelyanova – Associate professor chair of economics and management

4/3 Okruzhnaya St., Kaluga 248021



N. V. Kharchikova
Kaluga branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Nataliya V. Kharchikova – Associate professor chair of science and mathematics

4/3 Okruzhnaya St., Kaluga 248021



References

1. Falck O., Heblich S., Kipar S. Incumbent innovation and domestic entry. Small Business Economics, 2011. Vol. 36. No. 3 Pp. 271–279. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-009-9219-1

2. Audretsch D.B., Coad A., Segarra A. Firm growth and innovation. Small Business Economics. 2014. Vol. 43. No. 4. Pp. 743–749. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-014-9560-x

3. Fadeeva A.Y. Information and communication technologies as a development driver of regions investment attractiveness. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2017. Vol. 10. No. 4. Pp. 377–386. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2017-4-377-386

4. Heidhues P., Kőszegi B., Murooka T. Exploitative Innovation. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. 2016. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1257/mic.20140138

5. Emelyanova E.V. Social and economic development of the Kaluga region: main problems and directions of improvement. New university. Economics and law. 2016. No. 11-1(69). Pp. 18–22. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15350/2221-7347.2016.11-1

6. Gorodnikova N.V., Gokhberg L.M., Ditkovskii K.A., Kuznetsova I.A., Lukinova E.I., Martynova S.V., Ratai T.V., Rosovetskaya L.A., Fridlyanova S.Yu. Indikatory: innovatnsionoi deyatel’nosti 2018 [ Indicators of innovation activity: 2018]: Moscow: NRU HSE, 2018. Pp. 255–256. (In Russ.)

7. Reischauer G. Combining Artefact Analysis, Interview and Participant Observation to Study the Organizational Sensemaking Based Innovation. Historical Social Research. 2015. Vol. 40. No. 3. Pp. 279–298. DOI: 10.12759/HSR.40.2015.3.279-298

8. Ustinova L.N. Tendencies of innovative development of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 4. Pp. 338–345. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2018-4-338-345

9. Koveshnikova E.V. Regional innovation policy: methods of formation and implementation. Summary of Cand. Diss. (Econ.). Moscow, 2010. 23 p. (In Russ.)

10. Emelyanova E., Lesina T. Tax planning. Options of management. Modern European Researches. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 35–39.

11. Emelyanova E., Lesina T. Efficiency of reengineering. Assessment tools. Modern European Researches. 2017. No. 2. Pp. 78–87.

12. Abdrakhmanova G.I., Gokhberg L.M., Ditkovskii K.A., Islankina E.A., Kindras’ A.A., Kovaleva G.G., Kovaleva N.V., Kuznetsova V.I., Kuznetsova I.A., Kuz’min G.N., Kutsenko E.S., Martynov D.M., Martynova S.V., Nechaeva E.G., Ratai T.V., Sagieva G.S., Fridlyanova S.Yu., Fursov K.S. Reiting innovatsionnogo razvitiya sub»ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Vypusk 5 [Innovation Development Rating of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. No. 5]. Moscow: HSE, 2017. 260 p. (In Russ.)

13. Kharchikova N.V. Features of management of economic development of the municipality. Science Alley. 2018. No. 9(25). Pp. 221–225. (In Russ.)

14. Shaurina O.S. Attraction of foreign investments by instruments of customs and tariff regulation. Kaluzhskii ekonomicheskii vestnik = Kaluga Economic Journal. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 6–8. (In Russ.)

15. Hartley J., Sørensen E., Torfing J. Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Historical Journal of Film Radio and Television. 2013. Vol. 73. No. 6. Pp. 821–830. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12136

16. Oeij P.R.A., Dhondt S., Korver T. Workplace Innovation, Social Innovation, and Social Quality. The International Journal of Social Quality, Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 31–49. DOI: 10.3167/IJSQ.2011.010204

17. Ford C. Innovation-Framing Regulation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2013. Vol. 649. Pp. 76–97.

18. Ranchordás S. Innovation-Friendly Regulation: The Sunset of Regulation, the Sunrise of Innovation. Jurimetrics. 2015. Vol. 55. No. 2. Pp. 201–224. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2544291

19. Hutter M., Knoblauch H., Rammert W., Windeler A. Innovation Society Today. The Reflexive Creation of Novelty. Historical Social Research. 2015. Vol. 40. No. 3. Pp. 30–47. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/24583146

20. Danupol Hoonsopon, Guntalee Ruenrom. The Impact of Organizational Capabilities on the Development of Radical and Incremental Product Innovation and Product Innovation Performance. J. Managerial Issues. 2012. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 250–276.

21. Allen D.W.E., Potts J. How innovation commons contribute to discovering and developing new technologies. International Journal of the Commons. 2016. Vol. 10. No. 2. Pp. 1035–1054. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.644


Review

For citations:


Emelyanova E.V., Kharchikova N.V. Innovative potential on the regions of the Central Federal District: assessment of the main tendencies and prospects for future development. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2019;12(4):443-454. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2019-4-443-454

Views: 1515


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-1633 (Print)
ISSN 2413-662X (Online)