Technological readiness of industry for open innovation

The relevance of the article is due to the fact that the issues of technological readiness of industrial systems to open innovation models have not yet been fully resolved and require further study and systematization of their determining factors, which is especially important in the context of transition to a new technological structure and the use of opening technological windows. The solution of these problems will allow us to identify new opportunities for qualitative and quantitative growth of the industry by improving the targeting of innovations. The purpose of the article is to determine the functional dependence of the technological readiness index and the opening of technological windows of opportunities for increasing the efficiency of industry. As the main research methods, the article used the description method, which made it possible to identify the trends of the technological readiness index in countries of the world; the method of correlation analysis, which allowed to establish the closeness of the relationship between the technological readiness index and indicators of state support for innovation in production. The article discusses issues of increasing production efficiency in the framework of the open innovation model. The interrelation between the technological readiness index and the indicators of the quality of state institutions, which characterize the level of support for innovation in industry in the countries of the world, is revealed. The materials of the article can be used in the development of strategies and programs for improving production efficiency in the Russian economy, taking into account the opening of technological windows of opportunity and the technological readiness of production for innovative transformations.

1. Chen J., Adamson C. Innovation: Integration of random variation and creative synthesis. Academy of Management Review. 2015. No. 40(3). Рp. 461-464.

2. McKinley W., Latham S., Braun M. Organizational decline and innovation: Turnarounds and downward spirals. Academy of Management Review. 2014. No. 39 (1). Рp. 88-110. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2011.0356

3. Alexander L., Knippenberg D. Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Academy of Management Review. 2014. No. 39 (4). Pp. 423-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0044

4. Cano-Kollmann M., Cantwell J., Hannigan T.J., Mudambi R., Song J. Knowledge connectivity: An agenda for innovation research in international business. Journal of International Business Studies. 2016. No. 47 (3). Pp. 255-262. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2016.8

5. Un C.A. The liability of localness in innovation. Journal of International Business Studies. 2016. No. 47 (1). Pp. 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.24

6. Kang J.H., Solomon G.T., Choi D.Y. CEOs' Leadership styles and managers' Innovative behaviour: Investigation of intervening effects in an entrepreneurial context. Journal of Management Studies. 2015. No. 52 (4). Pp. 531-554. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12125

7. Zheng Y., Yang H. Does familiarity foster innovation? The impact of alliance partner repeatedness on breakthrough innovations. Journal of Management Studies. 2015. No. 52 (2). Pp. 213¬230. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12112

8. Kudryavtseva S.S. Dynamic modeling of indicators of innovative development of Russian economy. Ekonomicheskij vestnik Respubliki Tatarstan = Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 49-53. (In Russ.)

9. Kudryavtseva S.S., Shinkevich A.I. Modeling growth factors of open national innovation systems. Management in Russia and Abroad. 2018. No. 5. Pp. 3-9. (In Russ.)

10. Polzin F., von Flotow P., Klerkx L. Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: Exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016. No. 103. Pp. 34-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.001

11. Mutenje M., Kassie M., Kankwamba H., Mangisonib J. Agricultural innovations and food security in Malawi: Gender dynamics, institutions and market implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016. No. 103. Pp. 240-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.004

12. Vlaisavljevic V., Cabello-Medina C., Perez-Luno A. Coping with Diversity in Alliances for Innovation: The Role of Relational Social Capital and Knowledge Codifiability. British Journal of Management. 2015. No. 27 (2). Pp. 304-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12155

13. Scarbrough H., Robertson M., Swan J. Diffusion in the Face of Failure: Evolution of a Management Innovation. British Journal of Management. 2015. No. 26 (3). Pp. 365-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12093

14. Frow P., Nenonen S., Storbacka K., Payne A. Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation. British Journal of Management. 2015. No. 26 (3). Pp. 463-483. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12087

15. Kudryavtseva S.S., Neganov K.K. Razvitie transportno-logisticheskoi infrastruktury rossiiskoi ekonomiki na printsipakh modeli otkrytykh innovatsii [Development of the transport and logistics infrastructure of the Russian economy on the principles of an open innovation model]. Russian economy: a look into the future: materials of the III international scientific-practical conference (in absentia): in 2 parts.. Tambov: Tambovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet imeni G.R. Derzhavina, 2017. Pp. 154-159. (In Russ.)

16. Neganov K.K., Kudryavtseva S.S. Monitoring ekologicheskih innovacij na regional'nom urovne [Monitoring of environ¬mental innovation at the regional level]. VIII Youth Ecological Congress «Northern Palmira»: congress materials. Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii nauchno-issledovatel'skii tsentr ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti RAN, 2017. Pp. 406-410. (In Russ.)

17. Agrawal A., Bhattacharya S., Hasija S. Cost-reducing innovation and the role of patent intermediaries in increasing market efficiency. Production and Operations Management. 2015. No. 25 (2). Pp. 173-191. DOI: 10.1111/poms.12391

18. Guo H., Easley, R.F. Network Neutrality Versus Paid Prioritization: Analyzing the Impact on Content Innovation. Production and Operations Management. 2016. No. 25 (7). Pp. 1261-1273. DOI: 10.1111/poms.12560

19. Tong C., Nagarajan M., Cheng, Y. Operational impact of service innovations in multi-step service systems. Production and Operations Management. 2015. No. 25 (5). Pp. 833-848. DOI: 10.1111/poms.12508

20. Sahu S.K., Narayanan K. Environmental Certification and Technical Efficiency: A Study of Manufacturing Firms in India. Journal of Industry Competition and Trade. 2016. No. 16 (2). Pp. 191-207.

21. Brezavscek A. Stochastic approach to planning of spares for complex deteriorating industrial system. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management. 2015. No. 12 (4). Pp. 465-480. DOI: 10.1080/16843703.2015.11673431

22. Carpenter C. Innovative developments in Caspian Republics' oil and gas production. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 2016. No. 68(1). Рр. 42-45. DOI: 10.2118/0116-0042-JPT

23. Narandja M.E., Howes S., Fattahi B. The role of soft skills in a challenging environment. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 2015. No. 67 (9). Рр. 102-108. DOI: 10.2118/0915- 0102-JPT

24. Kudryavtseva S.S. Digitalization of the economy in open national innovation systems. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta = Actual problems of economics and management. 2018. No. 4 (20). Pp. 76-81. (In Russ..)

25. Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti: statisticheskij sbornik [Indicators of Innovation: a statistical compilation]. N.V. Gorodnikova, L.M. Gohberg, K.A. Ditkovskij i dr. Moscow: NIU VShE, 2018. 344 р. (In Russ.)

26. The Networked Readiness Index. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2015/ (accessed: 21.02.2016).

27. Perez C., Soete L. Catching up in Technology: Entry Barriers and Windows of Opportunity. Technical Change and Economic Theory. New York: Pinter Publishers, 1988. Рр. 458-463.

28. Scherer F., Ross D. Struktura otraslevyh rynkov [The structure of industry markets]. Moscow: INFRA-M., 1997. 698 p. (In Russ.)

29. Tsinopoulos Ch, Sousa C., Yan Ji. Process Innovation: Open Innovation and the Moderating Role of the Motivation to Achieve Legitimacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2018. No. 35 (1). Рр. 27-48.

30. Shinkevich A.I., Kudryavtseva S.S., Vodolazhskaya E.L., Ostanina S.S., Sharafutdinova M.M., Razdrokov E.N., Lushchik I.V. Method for assessing of the level of national innovation systems openness from the institutional approach perspective. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. Vol.. 11. No. 17. Pp. 10505-10515.

31. Всемирный банк. Available at: http:// data.worldbank.org/indicator (accessed: 18.01.2016). (In Russ.)

32.