Preview

Russian Journal of Industrial Economics

Advanced search

Approach to an integrated assessment of the effectiveness of the development strategy of the Russian oil industry

https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-1-123-131

Abstract

Currently, when planning and monitoring the implementation of the development strategy of the Russian oil industry, several target indicators are used in the areas of industry development. The presence of several indicators related to various tactical tasks of the development of the oil industry, with the limited capabilities of the decision maker, does not allow to generalize these data without the use of special tools. These reasons make it necessary to use an integrated indicator in the strategic management of the Russian oil industry, which will allow us to assess the dynamics of the complex state of the Russian oil industry in time, as well as conduct international comparisons. The paper proposes a methodology for evaluating such an integral indicator using methods of hierarchy analysis, a weighted sum of criteria, cluster analysis and the Delphi method. The integral indicator is a synthetic indicator obtained by collapsing the local indicators of the oil industry (quantitatively characterizing the degree of solution of tactical tasks), taking into account the weights of these indicators, as well as the significance of tactical tasks relative to the strategic goal. To evaluate the weight of the criteria system, the hierarchy analysis method is used. The folding of the criteria system is carried out using the method of weighted sum of criteria. Target values of local indicators are estimated using cluster analysis and the Delphi method.

About the Authors

B. R. Khabriev
The Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Bulat R. Khabriev - Post-graduate student.

4 Nakhimovskii Prospekt, Moscow 117418



N. V. Bakhtizina
The Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Nafisa V. Bakhtizina - PhD, Senior Researcher.

4 Nakhimovskii Prospekt, Moscow 117418



А. R. Bakhtizin
The Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Al'bert R. Bakhtizin - Corresponding Member RAS, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Director.

4 Nakhimovskii Prospekt, Moscow 117418



References

1. The energy strategy of Russia for the period until 2030. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 13, 2009 N 1715-r. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_94054/ (accessed: 05.02.2020) .

2. General scheme for the development of the oil industry until 2020. Order of the Ministry of Energy of Russia dated 06.06.2011 N 212. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/55082305/ (accessed: 05.02.2020) .

3. Kvint V.L. The Concept of Strategizing. Vol. 1. SPb.: NWIM RANEPA, 2019. 132 p. (In Russ.)

4. The draft Energy Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2035 (revised on 12/18/2019). Energy strategy. Available at: https://minenergo.gov.ru/node/1920 (accessed: 05.02.2020).

5. Draft General Scheme for the Development of the Russian Oil Industry. Ministry of Energy of Russia, 2011. Available at: https://minenergo.gov.ru/sites/default/files/2016-07-05_Korrektirovka_generalnyh_shem_razvitiya_neftyanoy_i_gazovoy_otrasley_na_period_do_2035_goda.pdf (accessed: 02.21.2020).

6. Khabriev B.R., Bakhtizina N.V. Improving the strategic planning system for the development of the oil and gas complex in Russia. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 85-99. https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-4(87)-85-99

7. On national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period until 2024. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 07.05. 2018 N 204. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71837200 (accessed: 02.21.2020).

8. The concept of long-term socio-economic development of the Russian Federation until 2020. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 17.11.2008 N 1662-r. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_82134/ (accessed: 02.21.2020).

9. Strategy for scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 01.12.2016 N 642. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_207967/ (accessed: 02.21.2020).

10. Moore G.H. Business Cycles, Inflation, and Forecasting, 2nd edition. Ballinger, 1983. 499 p.

11. Zarghani S.H. Designing a New Model to Measure National Power of the Countries. 2017. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321251360 (accessed: 02.23.2020).

12. Figueira, J., Greco, S., and Ehrgott, M., eds, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2016. DOI: 10.5937/ekonhor1802189K

13. Akgun A.A., van Leeuwen E., Nijkamp P. A multi-actor multi-criteria scenario analysis of regional sustainable resource policy. Ecological Economics. 2012. Vol. 78. Pр. 19-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.026

14. Shevtsov P.A. Development of a methodology for creating an integrated indicator for assessing the level and quality of life of the population. Economic and Law Issues. 2011. No. 9. Pp. 51-55.

15. Zakharova A.A., Mitsel A.A. Model of an integrated assessment of the strategic development of a city. Reports of TUSUR, 2005. No. 3 (11). Pp. 11-16.

16. Paradise NN, Sergienko Ya.V., Frenkel A.A. The use of integral indices in the analysis of cyclical changes in the Russian economy. Voprosy statistiki, 2009. No. 12. Pp. 8-12.

17. Hadad S. Analytic hierarchy process analysis for choosing a corporate social entrepreneurship strategy. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 185-207. DOI: 10.1515/mmcks-2015-0014

18. Basar P. The analytic hierarchy process method to design strategic decision making for the effective assessment of supplier selection in construction industry. Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM). 2018. Vol. 5 (2). Pp. 142-149. DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.833

19. Goepel Kl.) Implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Standard Method for Multi Criteria Decision Making in Corporate Enterprises - a New AHP Excel Template with Multiple Inputs // Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2013. DOI: 10.13033/isahp.y2013.047

20. Grigoryeva S.V. Assessment of strategic sustainability in enterprise development. Economic and Law Issues. 2013. No. 3. Pp. 33-37.

21. Saati T. Decision Making. Hierarchy Analysis Method. Moscow: Radio and communications, 1993. 278 p.

22. Belton V., Stewart T.J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An integrated approach. Boston / Dordrecht / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. 372 p.

23. Leffler W.L. Oil refining. 2nd. Moscow: Olympus-Business, 2007. 224 p.

24. Kim Dj.O., Miyuller Ch. U., Klekka U.R. Factor, discriminant and cluster analysis. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 1989. 216 p.

25. Andreichikov A.V., Andreichikova O.N. Analysis, synthesis, planning decisions in the economy. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 2000. 368 p.


Review

For citations:


Khabriev B.R., Bakhtizina N.V., Bakhtizin А.R. Approach to an integrated assessment of the effectiveness of the development strategy of the Russian oil industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2020;13(1):123-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-1-123-131

Views: 835


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-1633 (Print)
ISSN 2413-662X (Online)