Innovative development of the regions and multiplier-based performance impact assessment of local resources
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-2-167-181
Abstract
One of the most important tasks of innovative development of a country and its regions is building an innovative vector of development essential for reaching a competitive level and economic growth. The authors have explored tasks and issues and tasks connected with quantitative explanation of still unresolved dependence of export-oriented countries’ economic growth on export volumes and prices in the foreign market. They used a three- way model of innovative development to study the productivity of resources in different areas of development.
As a result of their research the authors introduced a different approach to the notion of innovative development. It allows researchers to view it as a system and integrity in three co-related directions: technique and technology, currency and finance, and society and politics. Thus, they have the opportunity to estimate how much each sector of national (regional) economy individually and all of them together contribute to the economic growth. This approach provides the opportunity to examine the basic holistically co-related directions which allow measuring the level of innovative development, estimating the economy’s innovativeness, determining and viewing differently the innovative paradigm. The authors used mathematical model to study and introduce productivities of major types of resources. They point out that effective functioning of economy (including financial) makes it possible to develop industries gradually and to smooth out economic development of the regions, to avoid structural shifts and disproportions in economy which finally results in the possibility of productive implementation of programs of the country’s innovative development.
The authors have systematically studied the correlation between the productivity of resources and the achievement of systematic multiplier effect (there is no wide research found on this problem, the authors dealt with individual indicators of multiplier effect)
About the Authors
S. B. BayzakovKazakhstan
Sailau B. Bayzakov – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Scientific Director
Temirkazik Str., Nur-Sultan 010000
M. K. Uandykova
Kazakhstan
Mafura K. Uandykova – PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Technology and Ecology
55 Zhandosova Str., Almaty 050035
References
1. Uandykova M.K. Financial productivity of the interbranch balance model and its use in the formation of innovative development programs. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2019. Vol. 4. No. 2. Pp. 130–134. (In Russ.)
2. Nazarbayev N.A. The Fifth Way. Interfax International Information Group, Interfax News Agency Website. Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/interview/101426 (accessed: 24.04.2019). (In Russ.)
3. Uandykova M.K. Systemic principles of managing the innovative development of a region. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2017. Vol. 3. No. 6. Pp. 107–111. (In Russ.)
4. Uandykova M.K. Conceptual foundations of using the project approach to managing innovative development of a region. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 5. Pp. 61–65. (In Russ.)
5. Uandykova M.K. The analysis of directions influencing the models of formation and implementation of innovative development programs of regions. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava = Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2019. No. 12. Pt 1. Pp. 162–171. (In Russ.)
6. Bernal J. Nauka v istorii obshchestva [Science in the history of society]. Moscow: Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury, 1956. 735 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kuznets S. Sovremennyi ekonomicheskii rost: rezul’taty issledovanii i razmyshlenii. Nobelevskaya lektsiya [Modern economic growth: results of research and reflection. Nobel Lecture] In: Nobel Laureates in Economics: A View from Russia. St. Petersburg: Gumanistika, 2003. 966 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kleinknect Al. Innovation patterns in crisis and prosperity: Shumpeter’s long cycle reconsiders. Hong Kong, 1987.
9. Sennikova I.L., Snigireva G.D. A conceptual approach to assessing innovation and investment potential as the most important resource factor for the development of a region. Questions of the Regional Economy. 2015. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 42–49. (In Russ.)
10. Freeman X. Innovatsionnyi biznes [Innovative business]. M.: Nauka, 2002. (In Russ.)
11. Leshchinskya A.F., Leshchinskya M.V. Innovative high-tech technologies; financing system. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2013. No. 4. Pp. 64–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2013-4-64-69
12. Medvedev D.A. Social and economic development of Russia: finding new dynamics. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2016. No. 10. Pp. 5–30. (In Russ). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-10-5-30
13. Ilina I.E., Zharova E.N., Agamirova E.V., Kamenskiy A.S. Innovative Development of the Regions of Russia. Regionologiya = Regionology. 2018. Vol. 26. No. 2. Pp. 230–255. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.103.026.201802.230255
14. Kharin A.A., Rozhdestvensky A.V., Kolensky I.L. Upravlenie innovatsionnymi protsessami [Management of innovative processes]. Moscow; Berlin: Direct Media, 2016. 471 p. (In Russ.)
15. Yakovets Yu.V. Epokhal’nye innovatsii XXI veka [Mythic innovations of the XXI century]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2004. 443 p. (In Russ.)
16. Sukharev O.S. Ekonomicheskaya dinamika: institutsional’nye i strukturnye factory [Economic dynamics: institutional and structural factors]. Moscow: Lenand, 2015. 240 p. (In Russ.)
17. Schumpeter J.A. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya [Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1995. 540 p. (In Russ.)
18. Narula R. Globalization and Technology: Interdependence, Innovation Systems and Industrial Policy. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press, 2003. 264 p.
19. Shane S. Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing. 1993. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 59–73. DOI: 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90011-S
20. Lau A.K.W., Lo W. Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015. Vol. 92. Pp. 99–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.005
21. Volkova I.O., Yakovleva A.Yu. Diagnostics of the conditions of energy sector innovation ecosystem development. Innovations. 2017. No. 10(228). (In Russ.). Available at: https://maginnov.ru/ru/zhurnal/arhiv/2017/innovacii-n10-2017/diagnostika-uslovijrazvitiya-innovacionnyh-ekosistem-v-energetike (accessed: 21.11.2019).
22. Glazyev S. Yu. Strategiya operezhayushchego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyakh global’nogo krizisa [Strategy for the rapid development of Russia in the global crisis]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2010. 255 p. (In Russ).
23. Granberg A.G. Dinamicheskie modeli narodnogo khozyaistva [Dynamic models of the national economy]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1985. 240 p. (In Russ.)
24. Leshchinskaya A.F. Investitsionnyi menedzhment [Investment management. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom MISiS, 2014. 148 p. (In Russ.)
25. Management mechanisms. Moscow: URSS, 2011. Available at: http://www.mtas.ru/about/smartman/mechanism/MU.pdf (accessed: 21.11.2019). (In Russ.)
26. Burkov V.N., Gusev V.B., Cherkashin A.M. Financial productivity of monopolized economies. Instruments and Systems. 1994. No. 11. Pp. 5–9. (In Russ.)
27. Baizakov S., Khambar B., Baizakov N. Economic and mathematical foundations of digitalization of Kazakhstan. Economics and Statistics. 2018. No. 3. Po. 18–26. (In Russ.)
28. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti proektov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva [Guidelines for assessing the socio-economic effectiveness of public-private partnership projects]. Ed. S. Abdumanapova. 2016.70 p. (In Russ.)
29. Maizels A. Commodities in crisis: An overview of the main issues. World Development. 1987. Vol. 15. No. 5. Pp. 537–549. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(87)90001-5
30. Leontiev V. Quantitative cost-output ratios in the US economic system. Ekonomist. 2009. No. 8. Pp. 64–85. (In Russ.)
31. Kossov V.V. Mezhotraslevoi balans [Intersectoral balance]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2009. 226 p. (In Russ.)
32. Leszczynski A., Podlepa V.A. The use of the elements of analysis of variance in the task of assessing the quality of clustering of economic and financial information. Financial Management. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 77–84. (In Russ.)
33. Papava V.G. Teorii produktivnosti kapitala i mezhotraslevoi balans [Theories of capital productivity and intersectoral balance]. Moscow: Metsnierba, 1987. 87 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bayzakov S.B., Uandykova M.K. Innovative development of the regions and multiplier-based performance impact assessment of local resources. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2020;13(2):167-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-2-167-181