Selection of strategic priorities of development of regional spatial and sectoral structure

The article generalizes methodological approaches to creating a mechanism for selecting strategic priorities of development of regional spatial and sectoral structure. The author studies the tendencies of choosing priorities of development in accordance with the basic principles of sustainable development, “consensuses” of various types, “inclusive economics”, “stakeholder economics”, “donut economics”, “sharing economics”. The conclusion is that methodological approaches under consideration are a kind of reflection of sustainable development principles. They serve as a transitional stage to noospheric approach that reflects balancing of “interests of a human”, “interests of the nature” and “interests of technology”. The author applies to this conception to suggest a mechanism for selecting strategic priorities of development of regional spatial and sectoral structure. Such a mechanism for selecting strategic priorities of development is supposed to be a “bridge” for the transition to “noonomics” as a new stage of development.

1. Kvint V.L., Bodrunov S.D. Strategic transformation of society: knowledge, technology, noonomy. St.Petersburg: Institute of New Industrial Development named after Witte; 2021. 351 p. (In Russ.)

2. Shchedrovitskiy P.G. The ABC of Industrial Revolutions: Modernity. 2019. (In Russ.). URL: https://shchedrovitskiy.com/azbuka-promyshlennyh-revolyuciy-sovremennost (accessed on 14.06.2021).

3. Glaz’ev S.Yu. Leap into the future. Russia in new technological and world economic structures. Moscow: Knizhnyj Mir; 2018. 768 p. (In Russ.).

4. Post-crisis economic recovery and the main direction of the socioeconomic development forecast of Russia for the period up to 2035 / A.A. Shirov. Moscow: Nauka; 2020. 152 p. (In Russ.).

5. Williamson J. The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for Development. A lecture in the series “Practitioners of Development” delivered at the World Bank on January 13, 2004. Institute for International Economics. URL: https://piie.com/publications/papers/williamson0204.pdf (accessed on 16.06.2021).

6. Anan’in O., Shestakov D., Khaitkulov R. Washington Consensus: Landscape after Battles. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2010;(12):15–27.(In Russ.). URL: https://www.imemo.ru/index.php?page_id=1248&file=https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/magazines/meimo/12_2010/2-Ananyin.pdf

7. Ramo J.C. The Beijing Consensus. London: Foreign Policy Center; 2004. 74 p. URL: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/23013/Beijing_Consensus.pdf

8. Quinn A. Time-traveling Larry Summers envisions “Mumbai Consensus”. 2010. URL: http://web. archive.org/web/20100609135353/http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2010/06/02/time-traveling-larrysummers-envisions-mumbai-consensus/ (accessed on 16.06.2021).

9. Pacetti E.G. The Five Characteristics of an Inclusive Economy: Getting Beyond the EquityGrowth Dichotomy. 13.12.2016. URL: https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/five-characteristics-inclusive-economy-getting-beyond-equity-growth-dichotomy (accessed on 17.06.2021).

10. Ashford R. Why Working But Poor? The Need for Inclusive Capitalism. Akron Law Review. 2015;49(2):art.11(506-537). (In Russ.).

11. Avdokushin E.F., Ivanova V.N. The inclusive development: main direction, basic prerequisites and possible restrictions. Voprosy novoj ekonomiki. 2014;(3(31)):4–13. (In Russ.).

12. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984. 276 p.

13. Nikiforova E.V., Klepikova L.V., Shnajder O.V. Sustainable development of economic entities: key tasks, stages and interests of stakeholders. Azimuth of scientific research: economics and administration. 2018;(3(24)):120–124. (In Russ.).

14. Likhtarova O.V. Stakeholder approach to sustainable development economic entity. Balkan Scientific Review. 2019;2(4):102–105. (In Russ.). URL: https://balkan-sci-review.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BSR-2019-T.3-24-2.pdf

15. Freeman R.E., Martin K., Parmar B. Stakeholder Capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics. 2007;74(4):303– 314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9517-y

16. Raworth K. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Random House Business; 2017. 384 p.

17. Solozhentsev E.D. Management of safety of socioeconomic systems. Issues of risk analysis. 2017;14(5):6–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2017-14-5-6-19

18. Zemskova E.S. Sharing as a reflection of consumer values in the digital economy. Scientific journal NRU ITMO. Series “Economics and Environmental Management”. 2019;(3):17–27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17586/2310-1172-2019-12-3-17-27

19. Shichiyakh R.A., Tuguz N.S., Shering economy: specificity, development trends, advantages and disadvantages of implementation. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2020;39(4):383–386. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2304-6139-2020-10497

20. The sharing economy as a new economic model. 2019. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation. URL: https://ac.gov.ru/news/page/ekonomika-sovmestnogo-potreblenia---novyj-mirovoj-trend-23705 (accessed on 11.08.2021). (In Russ.).

21. Misharin Yu.V. Strategic management of competitiveness in regional spatial and sectoral structures under modern conditions. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2021;14(1):7–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2021-1-7-16

22. Voluntary National Review of the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and the FSGS of Russia. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/file/dcbc39abeafb0418d9d48c06c958e454/obzor.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2021).

23. Sustainable Development Goals in the Russian Federation. Brief statistical collection. Moscow; 2020. 79 p. (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/sdg/report/document/69771

24. Report on the results of the expert and analytical event “Analysis of the public administration system for the implementation of the sustainable development agenda for the period of 2019, the expired period of 2020”. Accounting board of the Russian Federation. URL: https://ach.gov.ru/upload/iblock/761/76119231ce487594c1301b38be450c96.pdf (accessed on 11.08.2021). (In Russ.).

25. Pytkin A.N. Directions and priorities of strategic development of the regional spatial and sectoral structure, taking into account the informatization of the Russian economy. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2021;11(6):1361– 1372. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.11.6.112198

26. Vinge V. The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era. Vision-21: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace. San Diego: San Diego State University; 1993:11–22.

27. Kurzweil R. The Age of Spiritual Machines. New-York: Penguin Books; 1999. 388 p.

28. Epstein M. The Creative Disappearance of the Human Being: An Introduction into Humanology. Filosofskie Nauki. 2009;(2):91–105. (In Russ.).

29. KaplanR.S.,NortonD.P.TheBalancedScorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1996. URL: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=15760 Transl. in Russ.: Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazateley. Ot strategii k deistviyu. Moscow: Olimp-Biznes; 2003. 304 p.

30. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2004.URL: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=15760 Transl. in Russ.: Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Strategichskie karty. Transformatsiya nematerial’nykh aktivov v material’nye rezultaty. Moscow: OlimpBiznes; 2005. 512 p.

31. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines G4. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative; 2013. 284 p. URL: http://www.ecp.ru/sites/default/files/download/stakeholder/Russian-G4-Part-Two.pdf