Sources for building intellectual potential of businesses during the transition to digital economy

During the period of digitalization and building the knowledge economy the conditions and nature of human labour (including people’s intellectual work) are significantly changing. The author analyzes a vast amount of publications on the topic and concludes that building intellectual potential is largely dependent on the effectiveness of models of crossfunctional and interpersonal coordination used, as well as on how various groups (hierarchy levels) of the company are prepared to cooperate with each other. Therefore, the author points out a vital role of social and cultural factors, following tradition and ensuring the continuity of development for success in enlarging intellectual potential. The article emphasizes the importance of preserving key social skills of the employees in the context of development of digital technology and remote interaction. The author points out the limited potential of “creative class” representatives in an industrial company which makes development of tools for internal entrepreneurship, implemented with the support of its own staff, even more acute. So, the new reality presupposes that the most important task of increasing intellectual potential of an industrial company and obtaining dynamic capabilities essential for its development should be solved with the consideration of the action of inertial forces. Thus the process will be of more uniform and stable character, and it will ensure the continuity of various social and historical practices which existed in Russia and the USSR. The institutional environment for reproduction of innovation formed at the corporate level should involve modern international models and methods of job organization and take into account cultural and historical peculiarities of development of the Russian society.

1. Kurennoi V. The Creative Class: How Creative Industries Can Help Grow the Economy. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/opinions/economics/29/11/2017/5a1e66a09a79478521dc8da1 (In Russ.). (Accessed 01.06.2021).

2. Zolotarev O.V. The creative class in modern Russia. Human. Culture. Education. 2016;(1(19)):87–96. (In Russ.). URL: http://pce.syktsu.ru/publes/1_19_8.pdf

3. Deryabina M.A. Organization of the Real Sector of the Economy: Evolution of Theoretical Paradigms. Report. Moscow: Inst. Econ. RAS; 2015. 42 p. (In Russ.).

4. Korsakova L.G., Chuikin A.M. The strategic potential of an organization: A theoretical framework for research. IKBFU’s Vestnik: The humanities and social science. 2015;(9):114–127. (In Russ.). URL: https://journals.kantiana.ru/eng/vestnik/2088/6116/

5. Trachuk A.V. The Concept of Dynamic Capabilities: In Search of Microfoundations. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2014;(4(67)):39–48. (In Russ.).

6. Neretina E.A. Company’s dynamic capabilities and strategic architecture. University proceedings. Volga region. Social sciences. 2011;(1(17)):111–115. (In Russ.). URL: https://izvuz_on_eng.pnzgu.ru/on14111

7. Kleiner G.B. Re-industrialization, rescientification, re-institutionalization – the key tasks of the economic revival of Russia. The Economic Revival of Russia. 2015;(4(46)):34–39. (In Russ.).

8. Chernovalov A.V., Tsekanovskii Z., Shiman’skii Z., Chernovalov P.A. The Digital Future or the Economics of Happiness. Мoscow: Dashkov i K; 2018. 218 p. (In Russ.).

9. Voeikov M.I. Market fundamentalism and a new wave of vulgarization in economics. Problems in political economy. 2015;(1):24–37. (In Russ.).

10. Kleiner G. Menedzherial’naya revolyutsiya. Ekonomika i zhizn’ = Economy and life. 2011;(38):16–17. (In Russ.).

11. Polterovich V.M. Institutional Traps and Ways Out. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2004;(3):5–16. (In Russ.). URL: https://ons-journal.ru/s086904990000617-0-1-ru-430/

12. Shapkin I.N., Voskresenskaya N.O. The Institutional Matrix of Russia in the Context of Global Issues. Age of globalization. 2016;(4):100–114. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/607453/

13. Ivleva G.Yu. The Russian social-economic alternatives and restoring development concept. Vestnik Orenburg State University. 2002;(4):24–29. (In Russ.). URL: http://vestnik.osu.ru/doc/1233/article/1104/lang/1

14. Didenko D.V. Creativity in economic history retrospective: intellectual laborers in industrial and postindustrial society. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2016;(1):80–89. (In Russ.).

15. Il’in A.N. Globalization of consumerism and related socio-cultural problems. Age of globalization. 2018;(3):81–94. (In Russ). http://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2018.03.08

16. Kleiner G.B. Reforming Enterprises: Opportunities and Prospects. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 1997;(3):15–29. (In Russ.).

17. Dobrenko E. Political Economy of Socialist Realism. Мoscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2007. 592 p. (In Russ.).

18. Kleiner G.B. De-commercialization of the economy as the cultural project (towards cultural theories in the economy). Humanities of the South of Russia. 2015;(2):140–146. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/hsr/issue/view/237

19. Dubin B. Institutions, networks, rituals. Pro et Contra. 2008;12(2-3):24–35. (In Russ.).

20. Movsesyan A.G. Liberalism and Economics. Мoscow: Logos; 2003. 240 p. (In Russ.).

21. Il’in A.N. The crisis of ecology and ecological consciousness in the consumer society. Age of globalization. 2016;(1-2):147–160. (In Russ.).

22. Ol’sevich Yu.A. Khudokormov A.G. The Legacy of Barbarism and Civilized Institutions. World Economic Thought. Through the prism of centuries. In 5 Vol’s. Moscow: Mysl’; 2005:322–337. (In Russ.).

23. Dolgin A.B. Manifesto of the New Economy. The second invisible hand of the market. Moscow: AST; 2010. 256 p. (In Russ.).

24. L’vov D.S. Moral Economics. Moscow: INES; 2004. 44 p. (In Russ.).

25. Kondratyuk T.V. Fourth industrial revolution: what competences are necessary for employees? Strategic decisions and risk management. 2018;(3):66–79. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2018-3-66-79

26. Kuz’minov Ya. How to Give a College Graduate Hope for Success. Vedomosti. 2017. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2017/11/28/743297-studentov-uspeshnimi (accessed on 01.06.2021).

27. Podvoiskii G.L. World of labour: contours of the future. The world of new economy. 2017;(4):23–31. (In Russ.). URL: https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/145/146

28. Savel’ev A.I.Contract law 2.0:“Smart Contracts” and the beginning of the end of the classic contract law. Civil Law Review. 2016(3):32–59. (In Russ.).

29. Shiryaev A. On some effects of robotization of industrial processes. Society and Economics. 2018;(5):59–67. (In Russ.).

30. Novikova I.V Strategic management of labor resources. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2018;11(4):318–326. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-4-318-326

31. Chumakov A.N., Stychinskii M.S. The CulturalCivilizationary Dialogue and the Opportunities it Provides in the Global World. Age of globalization. 2018;(1):3–14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2018.01.01

32. Sergeev V.I. Key Trends in Supply Chain Management and the Impact of the Pandemic. Logistika segodnya = Logistics today. 2020;(4):246–253. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36627/2500-1302-2020-4-4-246-253

33. Andreeva T.E. Knowledge Worker: An Attempt to Define Phenomena. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. 2007;(4):32–49. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.eng.vestnikmanagement.spbu.ru/archive/?article_id=390

34. Golov R.S. Digital Economy in Russia and the World – Towards a New Technological Way. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2017;(5):355–363. (In Russ.).

35. Chernyshev A.G. Strategy and Philosophy of Digitalization Digitalization. Vlast’. 2018;(5):13–21. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v26i5.5815

36. Popov E.V., Sukharev O.S. Digital Economy: “Irrational Optimism” of Management and Financing. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economy. Taxes. Right. 2018;(2):6–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2018-11-2-6-17

37. Creative Industries. 07.10.2018. (In Russ.). (Accessed 01.06.2021).

38. Ivleva G.Yu. “Economic imperialism” and the efficiency of public service. Public Administration. 2012;(5):16–19. (In Russ.).