Software product in the system of management of state-owned corporation

The authors present their methodological recommendations for choosing a software complex to make managerial decisions within a corporation’s activity. They study the system of management in state-owned corporations and give reasons for its improvement by means of implementing IT-decisions. Digitalization is transforming managerial decision making process in corporations in accordance with the speed of decision-making, timely maintenance of production process, ways and forms of information transmission. The authors prove that top-management’s responsibility for a company’s competitive positions in the market is growing fast due to the more intensive implementation of information technology and continuous development of innovative decisions. As state-owned enterprises have a complicated interdependent structure, the system of their management becomes a process which should conform with conceptual basis and principles of transformation of a company’s activity within digital economics. The authors prove that suggested recommendations for using big data technologies, determining and implementing IT-decisions make it possible to increase the efficiency of the management system by means of optimizing business process.

1. Danilova O.V., Ordov K.V., Belayeva I.Yu. Tariff policy in the electric power industry of Russia: methods, problems, prospects. Lecture notes in networks and systems. 2021;160:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60929-0_12

2. Danilova, O.V., Belayeva, I.Y. The power grid complex of Russia: from informatization to the strategy of digital network development. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. 2020;908:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_4

3. Yusupov R.M., Kasatkin V.V., Sokolov B.V., Ohtilev M.Yu. Analysis of influence of information technologies on efficiency of control systems of complex objects. Perspektivnye napravleniya razvitiya otechestvennyh informacionnyh tekhnologij. Mater. 3-ei mezhreg. nauch.-praktich. konf.. Sevastopol’: Sevastop. gos. un-t; 2017:14–18. (In Russ.).

4. Sharma R., Yetton P. The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MISQuarterly. 2003;27(4):533. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036548

5. Herrera M.E.B. Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation. Journal of Business Research. 2015;68(7):1468–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.036

6. Scott T. Your IT department will love these customer intelligence BI software choices. URL: https://technologyadvice.com/blog/information-technology/customer-intelligence-bi-software/ (accessed on 24.05.2021). (In Russ.)

7. Gao M., Huang J. Informing the market: The effect of modern information technologies on information production. Review of financial studies. 2020;33(4):1367– 1411. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3023689

8. Lashmanov A.D. Criteria for the selection of a software for corporate project management. Skif. Voprosy studentseskoi nauki = Scythian. Student science questions. 2019;5-1(33):162–166. (In Russ.).

9. Kinzyabulatov R. Software for business. What is it and how to choose. URL: https://habr.com/ru/company/trinion/blog/299036/ (accessed on 28.06.2021). (In Russ.).

10. Scott T. Power BI vs Tableau: A data analytics duel. URL: https://technologyadvice.com/blog/information-technology/power-bi-vs-tableau/ (accessed on 24.05.2021).

11. Dmitrenko S.A. The method of flows of integrated information and analytical support of strategic planning of organization. Risk: resursy,informaciya, snabzhenie, konkurenciya. 2017;(3):234–243. (In Russ.).

12. Dobrynin A., Chernykh K., Kupriyanovsky V., Kupriyanovsky P., Sinyagov S. The Digital Economy – the various ways to the effective use of technology (BIM, PLM, CAD, IOT, Smart City, BIG DATA, and others). International journal of open information technologies. 2016;(1):4–11. (In Russ.).

13. Dzardanov A.Y., Polischuk O.A., Zhuravleva D.N. Joint-stock property governance in state-owned companies in conditions of uncertainty. In: Ashmarina S.I., Horák J., Vrbka J., Šuleř P. (eds). Economic systems in the new era: stable systems in an unstable world. IES 2020. Lecture notes in networks and systems. 2021;160. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60929-0_13

14. Matvejkin I.V., Ogorodnikov P.I. Information technology as the basis for effective management of technical systems of agricultural enterprises. Ekaterinburg: In-t ekonomiki UrO RAN; 2019. 279 p. (In Russ.).

15. Uzialko A. Project management software buying guide. Review business news daily staff, Feb 23, 2021. URL: https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/9976-project-management-software-buyers-guide.html (accessed on 24.05.2021).

16. TechnologyAdvice Guide to Business Intelligence Software. URL: https://technologyadvice.com/business-intelligence/ (accessed on 24.05.2021).

17. Matende S., Ogao P. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation. Procedia Technology. 2013;(9):518–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.058

18. Sergeev I.V., Korepanov E.R., Sinicyn I.N., Shalamov A.S. Aggregative methods and information technology assessment organizational-technical and economic systems for mass application. Perspektivnye napravleniya razvitiya otechestvennyh informacionnyh tekhnologij. Mater. 3-ei mezhreg. nauch.-praktich. konf. Sevastopol’: Sevastop. gos. un-t; 2017:21–24. (In Russ.).

19. Krivozyateva M.S., Gajkova L.V. Approaches to selecting remote environments for automated IT-product testing. Krasnoyarsk Science. 2020;(2):91–103. (In Russ.).

20. Danilova O.V., Sorokina A.V. Theoretical and methodological approaches to decision making in modern business systems. In: Popkova E.G., Chesnokova A.V., Morozova I.A., eds. Specifics of decision making in modern business systems: regularities and tendencies. Emerald group publishing; 2019;Chapt.8:71–84. URL: https://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/Specifics-of-Decision-Making-in-Modern-Business-Systems/?k=978178756692

21. Marano V., Kostova T. Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of csr practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of management studies. 2015;53(1):28–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12124

22. McDonnell M.H., King B.G., Soule S.A. A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. American sociological review. 2015;80(3):654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415581335

23. Dixon P.J., John D.A. Technology issues facing corporate management in the 1990s. MIS quarterly. MIS quarterly. 1989;13(3):247–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/248998

24. Fiorini P.C., Jabbour C.J.C. Information systems and sustainable supply chain management towards a more sustainable society: Where we are and where we are going. International journal of information management. 2017;37(4):241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.12.004