Modeling and forecasting the influence of social infrastructure development of interregional migration in Russia

At present demographic development of Russia and its regions is one of the most important factors of the country’s economic growth and also is key priority of the state government system. In spite of that, the issues of interregional migration are poorly represented in the strategic planning documents both at the federal and regional level. The major migration-induced population growth can be observed in the federal cities, capital areas and central part of Russia. At the same time in 2019 there was migration loss in 47 subjects of the Russian Federation. In many regions it is combined with the natural population loss aggravating the situation. The emerging closed loop (decreasing attractiveness of the area – migration loss – deteriorating social and economic situation – decreasing attractiveness of the area) results in increasing contradictions. Variety of factors determining the direction and the dynamics of migration flows requires a comprehensive study of these processes. The analysis conducted revealed that the level of development of the territory’s infrastructure is of great significance in this matter. Therefore, this direction is considered to be the main one. For quantification the authors established a complex of individual indicators which were preprocessed and consistently merged into directional integral and later into a single integral indicator of the level of social infrastructure development. Moreover, it is advisable to define five groups of regions according to the degree of their potential’s realization and to consider the affiliation of the subject of the federation to a particular group as an additional factor. Thus, the authors obtained the regression equation which describes the interrelation between the parameters under study. ANOVA revealed the opportunity of its practical application. Based on this model, a scenario forecast for the development of social infrastructure in Russia and its regions has been formed.

1. Klimova N.I., Altufeva T.Ya., Ivanov P.A., Krasnoselskaya D.Kh., Shmakov M.V., Sakhapova G.R., Tyutyunnikova T.I. Financial management of territories at various stages of their life cycle. Ufa: ISER UFRC RAS; 2019. 176 p. (In Russ.)

2. Fesheshenko V.V. Mobility as a vector for the development of the economy of the future. Economics. Sociology. Law. 2019;1(13):54–58. (In Russ.). URL: http://profit-brgu.ru/wp-content/numbers/2019-N1/2019-N1-08.pdf (accessed on 05.12.2021).

3. Strashdov Yu.G., Makarova I.E. The sociodemographic aspects of building social infrastructure in the city of Moscow. Constraction, Science and Education. 2018;(8(1(27)):55–74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2018.1.5

4. Nizamutdinov M.M., Atnabaeva A.R., Akhmetzyanova M.I. Research of interregional migration processes based on simulation modelling. Proceedings of the RAS Ufa Scientific Centre. 2020;(3):93–99.(In Russ.). URL: http://sciencerb.ru/vyp/3_2020/93-99.pdf (accessed on 05.12.2021).

5. Gubanova E.V., Grishkovskaya Yu.N. Investments in human capital as a key factor for the development of the region. Kaluzhskiy ekonomicheskiy vestnik = Kaluga Economic Bulletin. 2019;(2):66–71. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.fa.ru/fil/kaluga/science/Documents/Научные мероприятия 2019 год/Калуж.эконом.вестник_2_2019.pdf (accessed on 05.12.2021).

6. Amirova E.F. Labor market trends in the conditions of a digital economy. Regional problems of transformation of the economy: integration processes and mechanisms for the formation and socio-economic policy of the region. Materials of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference. Makhachkala: Institute of Socio and Economic Research Dagestan; 2018, pp. 504–506. (In Russ.)

7. Akhmetov T.R. Evolution of multi-level economic systems under the impact of globalization of the world economy and its digitalization processes. Proceedings of the RAS Ufa Scientific Centre. 2020;(3):82–87. (In Russ.). URL: http://sciencerb.ru/vyp/3_2020/82-87.pdf (accessed on 05.12.2021).

8. Bunkovsky D.V. Legal and illegal entrepreneurship in modern conditions. Irkutsk: East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; 2019. 173 p. (In Russ.)

9. Atkociuniene V., Kiausiene I. Scenarios of development of rural social infrastructure: the case of Lithuania. Transformations in Business and Economics. 2017;3(42):73–88.

10. Kumari A., Sharma A.K. Physical & social infrastructure in India & its relationship with economic development. World Development Perspectives. 2017;(5):30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2017.02.005

11. Soyeva S.B., Rostov O.V. System of the balanced indicators and its information support. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2012;2-1(144):44–50. (In Russ.)

12. Krivoshlikov V.S., Zhahov, N.V., Fomicheva LM. Economics and management interregional differentiation from the point of economic security. Vestnik KRSU. 2017;(2):27–30. (In Russ.). URL: http://vestnik.krsu.edu.kg/archive/12/1061 (accessed on 05.12.2021).

13. Krasnoselskaya D.Kh. Norm ratio of physical and human resources capital accumulation: theoretical approaches and model approbation/approval. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. 2013;(4):92–96. (In Russ.). URL: http://intellekt-izdanie.osu.ru/arch/2013_4.pdf (accessed on 05.12.2021).

14. Sadykov R.M., Migunov Yu.V., Gavrikova A.V., Ishmuratova D.F. Social development of the region in a volatile economic environment: the key aspects. Regional Economics: Teory and Practice. 2017;10(445):1906–1919. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24891/re.15.10.1906

15. Tyutin D., Emelyanova E., Lesina T., Kharchikova N., Maslennikova N., Aygumov T. Economics and democracy: The problems of democratic maturity of local communities in the context of regional spatial disbalances. Amazonia Investiga. 2019; 8(21):551–557.

16. Martyshenko S.N. Conceptual models of quality management of a life. Analytical review. Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal. 2014;2(38):80–92. (In Russ.). URL: https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/135 (accessed on 05.12.2021).

17. Alvarez M., Moreno A. Mataix C. The analytic hierarchy process to support decision-making processes in infrastructure projects with social impact. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 2012;(24(5-6)):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.669561

18. Nizamutdinov M.M., Oreshnikov V.V. Designing a set of econometric models to measure the impact of social infrastructure on demographic development indicators in Russian regions. Region: Economics and Sociology. 2020;4(108):78–99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/reg20200404

19. Aitova Yu.S., Oreshnikov V.V. Interrelation between the level of development and financing of social infrastructure in the Russian Federation. Vestnik NGIEI. 2020;11(114):160–174. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-9407-2020-10114

20. Suslov S.A., Drugvvyov N.S., Generals I.G., Cherochin A.D. The role of information technologies in regional markets’ competitiveness growth. Discussion. 2015;8(60):45–49. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rol-informatsionnyh-tehnologiy-vpovyshenii-konkurentosposobnosti-regionalnyhrynkov/viewer (accessed on 05.12.2021).

21. Bulatova E.I., Amirova E.F. Financial impact of digital technologies as a promising element of import substitution. International Journal of Financial Research. 2020;11(5):392–398. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n5p392