绿色建筑项目实施中的组织互动管理

价值链形成过程中平衡所有参与者的资本来实现的。分析了“绿色” 整合领域的研究现状。提出了一种评估整合资本的方法，该方法可以评估共同资本积累的效率及其带来的 “绿色” 附加值。作者开发了一套指标体系，用于评估整合参与者的潜力和整合资本的成熟度。通过建筑和建筑材料生产中的 “绿色” 整合案例，对评估整合资本的方法进行了检验。文中构建了三维图形（三棱柱），以展示参与者的潜力和整合资本的状态。分析结果表明，从整合资本总额的角度来看，最有效的企业是技术潜力高的企业——水泥制造商（平均值为2.8）。提升整合资本的主要方向是智力潜力。研究结果可用于情景建模，为 “绿色” 整合领域参与者的发展制定战略方案。

1. Handfield R., Petersen K., Cousins P., Lawson В. An organizational entrepreneurship model of supply management integration and performance outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2009;29(2):100–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910932011

2. Kong T., Feng T., Huo B. Green supply chain integration and financial performance: A social contagion and information sharing perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30(5):2255–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2745

3. Abbas A., Luo X., Wattoo M.U., Hu R. Organizational Behavior in green supply chain integration: nexus between information technology capability, green innovation, and organizational performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:874639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874639

4. Kaplinsky R. Global value chains: where they came from, where they are going and why this is important. IKD Working Paper No. 68; 2013. 28 p.

5. Morrison A., Pietrobelli C., Rabellotti R. Glo- bal value chains and technological capabilities: A framework to study learning and innovation in developing countries. Oxford Development Studies. 2008;36:39–58.

6. Sturgeon T.J., Memedovic O. Mapping global va- lue chain: intermediate goods trade and structural change in the world economy. Development Policy and Strategic Research Branch Working Paper 05/2010. 58 p.

7. Li G., Li L., Choi T.M., Sethi S.P. Green supply chain management in Chinese firms: Innovative measures and the moderating role of quick response technology. Journal of Operations Management. 2020;66(7-8):958–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1061

8. Gereffi G., Fernandez-Stark K. Global value chain analysis: a primer. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness (CGGC), Duke University, North Carolina, USA. Technical report. May 31, 2011. 40 p. Available at: https://www.globalvaluechains.org/wp-content/uploads/Primer_1stEd_2011.pdf (accessed on 10.06.2025).

9. Enders A., König A., Hungenberg H., Engelbertz T. Towards an integrated perspective of strategy: The value-process framework. Journal of Strategy and Management. 2009;2(1):76–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554250910948712

10. Panahifar F., Byrne P.J., Mohammad S.A., Heavey C. Supply chain collaboration and firm’s performance: The critical role of information sharing and trust. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2018;31(2):358–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM08-2017-0114

11. Wong C.Y., Wong C.W., Boonitt S. Effects of green supply chain integration and green innovation on environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Research. 2020;58(5):4589–4609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1756510

12. Yu Y., Zhang M., Huo B. The impact of supply chain quality integration on green supply chain management and environmental performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 2019;30(9-10):1110–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1356684

13. Yang G., Singhdong P. A conceptual framework of green supply chain integration toward enterprise performance through ambidextrous green innovation: an organizational capability perspective. Journal of International Logistics and Trade. 2024;22(2):93–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JILT-07-2023-0056

14. Dai Z.H., Ye C.M. Analysis and evaluation of key elements of optimal regulation of green supply Chain from the perspective of low carbon. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2022;2022(4):8196756. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8196756

15. Gamidullaeva L., Shmeleva N., Mityakov E., Tolstykh T., Vasin S. Strategic tools for the formation of cluster capital to implement technological innovations. Systems. 2025;13(4):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13040270

16. Wang Q., Geng C., He E. Dynamic coevolution of capital allocation efficiency of new energy vehicle enterprises from financing niche perspective. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2019;2019(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1412950.1412950

17. Olabi A.O., Shehata N., Issa U.H., Mohamed O.A., Mahmoud M., Abdelkareem M.A., Abdelzaher M.A. The role of green buildings in achieving the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Thermofluids. 2025;25:101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.101002

18. Libran Y.H., Mathur V.S., Muhammad S.U., Musa A.A. Carbon footprint management: a review of construction industry. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2022;9:100531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100531

19. Андреев В.Н. Разработка архитектоники технологического капитала предприятия. Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2024;1(12(153)):5–13. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.12.01.001

20. Potapova E., Korchunov I., Mikhailidi D., Rudomazin V. Increasing the durability in the context of green construction in regions with Arctic and Alpine climate. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2024;3243:020057. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0247505

21. Гусева Т.В., Волосатова А.А., Тихонова И.О. Направления совершенствования таксономии зеленых проектов для устойчивого развития промышленности. Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2022;24(5(109)):28–35. https://doi.org/10.37313/1990-5378-2022-24-5-28-35

22. Волосатова А.А., Гусева Т.В. Возможности гармонизации подходов государств-членов Евразийского экономического союза к проектам зеленого развития промышленности. В: Материалы XI Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. «Север и Арктика в новой парадигме мирового развития». Лузинские чтения – 2022. Апатиты, 22–23 сентября 2022 г. Апатиты: ФИЦ КНЦ; 2022. С. 13–14.