Identification and assessment of innovation potential in the building materials industry

The innovative activity of building materials enterprises, which shapes their competitive advantages, presupposes the presence of innovative potential. The problem lies in the fact that the interpretation of the concept of “innovation potential” and the methods for its calculation are contradictory and insufficiently specified. The research aims to identify the innovation potential, taking into account industry specifics, and to develop scientific and methodological approaches for its assessment. The research objectives are to define the essential understanding of a company’s innovation potential, develop a methodology and algorithm for calculating its level, form a system of evaluation indicators, and test the obtained results. The innovation potential of a building materials enterprise is identified as its ability to enhance competitiveness through the creation of innovative developments and their implementation into production, while maximizing the use of its organizational, managerial, financial, and production-technical capacities. The set of indicators for assessing innovation potential was formed considering technical, technological, organizational, managerial, financial, economic, and marketing factors of the enterprise’s internal environment, the list of mandatory statistical reporting indicators on organizational innovation activity, and the availability of primary data. The scheme for calculating the level of innovation potential is based on a qualimetric approach, which accounted for the significance of the identified indicators, determined through expert evaluation and statistical processing of online survey results. The expert assessment revealed that the most significant indicator is the presence of a dedicated R&D department within the enterprise’s structure. The proposed methodology was tested on a number of medium and large manufacturers of building products and structures in the Voronezh region. The quantitative assessment of the innovation potential of these enterprises revealed a low, and in some cases, significantly low level. The research results are of practical interest to regional government authorities and the business community.

1. Brodny J., Tutak M. Assessing the level of innovativeness and digitalization of enterprises in the European Union States. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2024;10(1):100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100210

2. Zheng Yu., Lin Ch., Yan J., Guo Ya. How to enhance the innovation capacity of technology-based enterprises: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance. 2025;97:103817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103817

3. Szklarz P. Innovators performance measurement Evidence based on intellectual assets utilization of enterprises in Poland. Procedia Computer Science. 2023;225(1):1514–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.140

4. Xing M., Gong Ch., Moon G., Ge X. Digital economy, dual innovation capability and enterprise labor productivity. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025;101:104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104005

5. Akulova I.I., Slavcheva G.S., Babenko D.S. Innovation index as a criterion for the of building materials and products novelty level. Construction Materials. 2025;(8):64–74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2025-838-8-64-74

6. Matveykin V.G., Dmitrievsky B.S., Popov N.S., Dmitriyeva O.V. Integrated models of innovative production system. Transactions of the Tambov Technical University. 2016;22(4):550–558. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17277/vestnik.2016.04.pp.550-558

7. Ильинская Е.М., Титова М.Н. Эффект синергии инновационного процесса в генерации наукоемких производств. В кн.: Технологические тренды и наукоемкая экономика: бизнес, отрасли, регионы. Под ред. О.Н. Кораблевой. СПб.: Центр научно-информационных технологий «Астерион»; 2021; 241–250. https://doi.org/10.53115/9785001880134

8. Kalendzhyan S.O., Korkin M.A. Directions for the development of the innovation potential of industrial enterprises. Upravlenie = Management. 2024;12(3):5–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2024-12-3-5-13

9. Makarkin N.P., Korneeva N.V., Rodkina I.I., Slavkina Ya.S. Assessment of the innovative potential of Russian enterprises and improvement of its effectiveness. Upravlencheskii uchet = Management Accounting. 2021;(7):109–118. (In Russ.)

10. Valitov Sh.M., Khakimov A.Kh. Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise developmen. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;24:716–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00682-6

11. Gureev P.M., Grishin V.N. Innovation potential: the problem definition and assessment. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2017;(4(222)):89–92. (In Russ.)

12. Morkovina S.S., Stepanova Yu.N. Innovative potential of enterprise: assessment and matrix of opportunities. Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta (RINKH) = Vestnik of Rostov State University of Economics (RINH). 2020;(2(70)):156–171. (In Russ.)

13. Sidorova E.U., Klimova A.A., Timochova G.V. Development of methodical aspects of the assessment of the innovation potential of the economic system. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2018;11(3):249–255. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-3-249-255

14. Goman K.I. Element composition of the innovation potential of industrial enterprises. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Management. 2021;12:(2):36–42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2021-12-2-36-42

15. Pushkareva M.V., Zubkova O.V. Methodology for assessment and analysis of the innovation potential of an industrial enterprise. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Economics and Management”. 2023;17(3):108–121. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14529/em230310

16. Astashova E.A., Pogrebtsova E.A., Durnev S.I. Enterprise’s innovative potential: essence, content and evaluation methodology. Creative Economy. 2022;16(3):925–940. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.16.3.114391

17. Sin’kova Yu.N. Theoretical and methodological aspects of estimation of innovative potential and innovative activity of the enterprise. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika = Scientific Research and Development. Economics. 2018;6(1):60–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a8d55b2802474.78237782

18. Ustinova L.N., Sirazetdinov R.M. Enterprise’s innovative potential: essence, structure and assessment. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2017;18(23):3751–3764. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/rp.18.23.38616

19. Liang N., Shi Yu., Chen Ya. R&D and operational efficiency in China’s innovative high-tech enterprises: Empirical analysis with two-stage slack based measure data envelopment analysis and threshold regression. Omega. 2025;136:103342 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2025.103342

20. Wang H., Zhang L, Xu D. Breakthrough technological innovation, market competition, and corporate competitive advantage. Finance Research Letters. 2025;76:107030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107030

21. Xiang B., Pan Zh., Yu D., Zuo W. Detecting technology opportunities appropriate for enterprise R&D: The synthesis analysis of industrial technical windows and enterprise competition relations. Technology in Society. 2025;82:102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102951

22. Farida I., Setiawan D. Business strategies and competitive advantage: The role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022;8(3):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163

23. Bylok F. Relations between organizational factors and innovativeness of large enterprises in Poland. Procedia Computer Science. 2023;225(S1):4024–4034. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

24. Havierniková K., Kordoš M., Dubček A. Factors affecting innovative activities of SMEs in Slovak regions. SHS Web of Conferences. 2019;61;01004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196101004

25. Ban G., Chankoson Th., Wang Yu. The impact of public policy on enterprise innovation performance: Panel data on financial subsidy policy. Heliyon. 2025;11(1):e41230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41230

26. Zhong Zh., Chen Zh. Business environment, technological innovation and government intervention: influences on high-quality economic development. Management Decision. 2023;61(3):2413–2441. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2022-1073

27. Zhu G., Xia M. Intellectual property protection and enterprise collaborative innovation. International Review of Economics and Finance. 2025;102:104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104319

28. Azgaldov G.G., Kostin A.V., Priven A.I., Smirnov V.V. Qualimetry in competitiveness measuring. Bol’shoy konsalting. 2014;(2):22–25. (In Russ.)

29. Frenkel A.A., Surkov A.A. Determination of weigh-/ ting factors in combining forecasts. Voprosy statistiki. 2017;(12):3–15. (In Russ.)

30. Akulova I.I., Slavcheva G.S. A new approach to identifying top priority step for increasing the building materials competitiveness. In: IOP Conf. series. Materials science and engineering. Inter. sci. and techn. conf. (FarEastCon 2020). 6–9 October 2020, Russkiy Island, Russia. Vladivostok, 28 January 2021. IOP Publishing Ltd; 2021. Vol. 1079. No. 032030. https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-12-45-50

31. Akulova I.I., Slavcheva G.S., Simonov D.А. Methodological approaches to assessing the technical and economic efficiency of building materials and structures use. In: E3S Web of conf. IV Inter. scient. Conf. “Construction and Architecture: Theory and Practice of Innovative Development” (CATPID-2021 Part 1). Nalchik, Russian Federation, 01–05 July 2021. EDP Sciences – Web of Conferences; 2021. Vol. 281. No 08008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128108008

32. Linden D., Cinelli M., Spada M., Becker W., Gasser P., Burgherr P. A framework based on statistical analysis and stakeholders’ preferences to inform weighting in composite indicators. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2021;145:105208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105208

33. Shekhovtsov A. Evaluating the performance of subjective weighting methods for multi-criteria decision-making using a novel weights similarity coefficient.Procedia Computer Science. 2023;225:4785–4794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.478

34. Shaoa K., Wangb X. Do government subsidies promote enterprise innovation? Evidencefrom Chinese listed companies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2023;8:100436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100436

35. Chernyshov E.M., Akulova I.I., Goncharova M.A., Sergutkina O.R., Potamoshneva N.D. Concept, methodology and applied solutions to the problem of construction and technological utilization of technogenic waste. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Stroitel’stvo = News from Higher Education Institutions. Construction. 2020;8(740):70–91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32683/0536-1052-2020-740-8-70-91

36. Kalashnikov V.I. & Tarakanov O.V. On the use of complex additives in new generation concretes. Stroitel’nyye materialy = Building materials. 2017;1-2:62–67. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28392793_43921334.pdf

37. Хозин В.Г., Хохряков О.В., Сигбатуллин И.Р. Карбонатные цементы низкой водопотребности: монография. М.: АСВ; 2021. 366 c. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_54107302_64700601.pdf