The modern paradigm of machine tool development in Russia as the basis of technological sovereignty
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2026-1-1563
Abstract
The level of development of machine tool industry is highly dependent on the external factors including changes in international politics, improvements in technology and innovation growth as well as the pace of economic development, and has a direct impact on the competitiveness of any country. The existing global level of development of the machine tool industry is characterized by convergence of technologies and significant digital trans- formation, which requires taking a fresh look at understanding the term “machine” gining it a status of “cyberphysical systems”, which acquires the qualities of hybrid equipment capable of performing a wide range of technological operations.
During the research the authors identified the technological and institutional problems of the machine tool industry. The specificity of the domestic industry lies in the high degree of import dependence. One of the reasons is the low level of competitiveness of domestic products on the world market, which is due to the low level of technological equipment of the production process of machine tools. At the same time, there is a lack of effectiveness in the formation and practical application of long-term planning documents. Based on the identified problems, a set of economic and managerial measures related to the sustainable functioning of the machine tool industry in the Russian Federation is proposed.
The purposes of the study are to theoretically justificate the term of the machine as a cyberphysical system, which involves a complex of technological and economic components of production activity, and to reveal the key problems of the machine tool industry in Russia and determine the directions of its development.
The authors of the article suggest a complex approach to define the concept of “a smart cyber-physically controlled machine tool” taking into account its both technological and economic aspects. It allowed to formulate an expanded definition of a new generation machine tool, which can be useful in the development of the relevant Russian standard and streamlining the use of the necessary terminology.
About the Authors
Z. V. KhidirovRussian Federation
Zurab V. Khidirov – Postgraduate Student
49/2 Leningradsky Ave., Moscow 125167
E. N. Kharitonova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina N. Kharitonova – Dr.Sci. (Econ.), Professor
49/2 Leningradsky Ave., Moscow 125167
References
1. Khairulina Ya.R., Dushin A.V., Lyaptsev G.A. Deindustrialization of Russian economy: problems and opportunities. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta. 2016;(4(44)):80–83. (In Russ.)
2. Сhernoutsan E.M. French industrial policy: Digital challenges. Current Problems of Europe. 2021;(3):28–53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2021.03.02
3. Sasaev N.I., Kvint V.L. Strategizing the industrial core of the national economy. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2024;17(3):245–260. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-3-1349
4. Pak B.I. The role of the governmental regulation for the machine tool industry development. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = Management of Economic Systems: Electronic Scientific Journal. 2017;(6(100)):1–14. (In Russ.)
5. Liu Ch., Xu X. Cyber-physical machine tool – the era of machine Tool 4.0. Procedia CIRP. 2017;63:70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.078
6. Kaarlelaa T., Outeiro J. A cyber-physical machine tool concept for education and workforce training in CNC machining. Manufacturing Letters. 2025;44S:1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.140
7. Liu C., Vengayil H., Zhong R.Y., Xu X. A systematic development method for cyber-physical machine tools. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2018;48(Part C):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.02.001
8. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2016. 171 p.
9. Manturov D.V. On the industrial policy of Russia for 2018–2030. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2018;(4(61)):7–22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2018-4-61-7-22
10. Кабалдин Ю.Г., Шатагин Д.А., Колчин П.В., Аносов М.С. Искусственный интеллект, интернет вещей, облачные технологии и цифровые двойники в современном механообрабатывающем производстве. Нижний Новгород: НГТУ им. Р.Е. Алексеева;2019. 196 с.
11. Greer C., Burns M., Wollman D., Griffor E. Cyber-physical systems and Internet of Things. NIST Special Publication 1900-202; 2019. 61 p. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1900-202
12. Oks S., Jalowski M., Lechner M., Mirschberger S., Merklein M., Vogel-Heuser B., Möslein K. Cyber-physical systems in the context of industry 4.0: a review, categorization and outlook. Information Systems Frontiers. 2024;26(5):1731–1772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10252-x
13. Ji T., Xu X. Exploring the Integration of cloud manufacturing and cyber-physical systems in the era of industry 4.0 – An OPC UA approach. Robotics and Computer–Integrated Manufacturing. 2025;93:102927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102927
14. Zivanovic S., Tabaković S., Zeljković M. Machine Tools and Industry 4.0 – Trends of Development. In: 4th Inter. scient. conf. “Conference on Mechanical Engineering Technologies and Applications” COMETa2018. At: University of East Sarajevo Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, East Sarajevo-Jahorina, RS, B&H. 27–30 November 2018; 2018. P. 2–19.
15. Slavin B.B., Neizvestnyy S.I., Khudyakov D.S. Convergence of digital technologies in assessing the efficiency of the processes of the IT departments of the enterprise. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovations and Investments. 2023;(4):267–272. (In Russ.)
16. Dementiev V.E., Elenev K.S., Kudryashov S.A. Organizational and economic factors of the development of the Russian machine tool industry. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2024;(4):46–60. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2024-4(107)-46-60
17. Garin A.A. Analysis of the state of the machine tool industry in Russia. Progressive Economy. 2025;(7):139–150. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54861/27131211_2025_7_139
18. Chernyaev E.V., Khaitbaev V.A. Assessment of the regulatory framework for the restoration strategy of the Russian machine tool building industry. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2024;(65):153–170. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/65/9
19. Kvint V.L. Strategy for the Global Market: Theory and Practical Applications. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 2016. 519 p.
20. Romanova O.A., Sirotin D.V. Digitalization of production processes in metallurgy: Trends and measurement methods. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta. 2021;(3(63)):136–148. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Khidirov Z.V., Kharitonova E.N. The modern paradigm of machine tool development in Russia as the basis of technological sovereignty. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2026;19(1):26-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2026-1-1563
JATS XML





























