Divergence of BRICS economies: cluster analysis and growth factors

In the context of global economic transformation and the growing role of emerging market countries, the BRICS group is often viewed as a monolithic actor capable of offering an alternative development model. However, the hypothesis of this study is that, despite shared geopolitical goals, the economic strategies of BRICS member countries diverge significantly under the influence of national fiscal and trade policy choices. To test this hypothesis, a cluster analysis method was used based on 15 indicators (mean values, standard deviation, and trend) for 22 countries.

The results of the analysis confirmed the divergence hypothesis. The BRICS countries were divided into different clusters, reflecting fundamentally different development models. China and India were included in the cluster of dynamically growing economies with moderate tax burdens and trade liberalization policies. Meanwhile, Brazil and South Africa were classified as countries in the “middle-income trap”, characterized by high tax burdens, complex regulations, and, consequently, a large shadow economy (over 40% of GDP). Russia and South Africa, while high-income, exhibit high growth volatility due to dependence on commodity markets and institutional weaknesses.

The clustering conducted in the study allowed us to identify the determinants of the BRICS countries’ inclusion in various strata of the global economic hierarchy. Development models largely depend on fiscal factors (tax and customs-tariff policies), which in turn influence the scale of the shadow economy and, ultimately, determine growth rates. Five fundamentally different patterns of economic growth were identified, refuting the hypothesis of a monolithic BRICS bloc. Cluster 0 demonstrates a “dynamic development” pattern – an export-oriented model with high investments in human capital, which ensures sustainable growth with a moderate shadow economy. Cluster 1 is characterized by a “protectionist stagnation” pattern: despite high customs barriers, weak fiscal institutions lead to the formation of a gigantic shadow sector, limiting the potential for sustainable growth. Cluster 2 represents a “middle-income trap” pattern, where excessive tax burdens suppress business activity, resulting in minimal growth rates and the scale of the shadow economy. Cluster 3 exhibits a “rent volatility” pattern: high per capita GDP is combined with growth instability due to dependence on commodity markets. Low tariffs and tax burdens do not compensate for institutional vulnerability, manifested in a moderately high level of shadow economy.

Thus, the optimal model is a balance of taxation, trade openness, and investment in human capital, while protectionism, excessive tax burdens, and dependence on commodity markets contribute to slower growth.

The study demonstrates that the key determinants of economic success and sustainability are not formal membership in an integration bloc, but specific national choices regarding tax and tariff policies. The effectiveness of these choices directly impacts the growth rate and scale of the shadow economy, determining a country’s place in the global economic hierarchy.

1. Vishnevsky V.P., Makovetsky S.A., Vishnevskaya E.N. Effects of Geoeconomic Fragmentation: BRICS vs G7. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2025;24(1):6–33. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.001

2. Kuznetsov A.V. The influence of the geopolitical situation on the formation of a new global financial architecture: Challenges and opportunities for Russia. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2022;15(4):17–29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-4-17-29

3. Морозова М.Е. Классификация стран мира на основе индексных и ресурсных показателей. В: Сб. ст. «Исследования молодых ученых: экономическая теория, социология, отраслевая и региональная экономика». Под ред. О.В. Тарасовой, А.А. Горюшкина. Новосибирск: Институт экономики и организации промышленного производства СО РАН; 2017. С. 390–395.

4. Matveevskii S.S., Borisova L.R. Clustering the countries of the Asia-pacific by values of inclusive economic growth. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(1):112–121. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-1-112-121

5. Okunev I.Yu., Barinov S.L., Belikov A.V., Polyakova Ya.O. Cross-country spatial patterns in terms of human development indices. Ekonomika regiona = Список источников / References Economy of Region. 2021;17(3):855–872. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-10

6. Sysoeva O.V., Vasina A.V., Kiseleva O.N., Goryacheva T.V. Regions clusterization by achieving a sustainable development while strengthening the technological sovereignty of the country. Ars Administrandi. 2025;17(2):374–402. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2025-2-374-402

7. Filkevich I.A., Pilipuk A.V., Bliznyuk O.S., Litvinchuk A.A. The regional economy clustering as a priority direction for sustainable development. Ehkonomika. Biznes. Banki = Economy. Business. Banks. 2022;(2(64)):8–23. (In Russ.)

8. Ordov K.V., Zyukin D.V., Latysheva Z.I., Chernykh A. Yu., Skripkina E.V. Formation of clusters of industrial developed regions as a basis of sustainability of the country’s economy. Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii = Bulletin of Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2021;(8):119–126. (In Russ.)

9. Medina L., Schneider F.G. Shadow Economies Around the World: What Did We Learn Over the Last 20 Years? IMF Working Paper. 2018;18(17):1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484338636.001

10. Polezharova L.V. Methodology for analyzing the effectiveness of tax administration mechanisms for cross-border transactions. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2021;14(5):112–125. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2021-14-5-112-125

11. Goncharenko L.I., Advokatova A.S., Kosenkova Yu. Yu. Special tax regimes as instruments of spatial economic development in the new conditions. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2021;14(6):127–136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2021-14-6-127-136

12. Goncharenko L.I., Vishnevskaya N.G. Tax incentives for innovative development of industrial production based on the analysis of advanced foreign experience. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2019;12(4):121–131. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2019-12-4-121-131

13. Okunev I., Zakharova E. The neighborhood effect on perceptions of corruption: Comparative spatial autocorrelation analysis. International Trends = Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy. 2023;21(2):103–119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.2.73.6

14. Chernyakov M.K., Chernyakova M.M. Forecasting trends in e-government development in post-Soviet countries. Journal of New Economy. 2019;20(4):5–21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-4-1

15. Zharikov M.V. The BRICS stocks index as an aggregate indicator of regional economic development. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021;14(12):1920–1932. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0870

16. Grigoryev L.M., Maykhrovitch M.Y. Growth theories: The realities of the last decades (Issues of sociocultural codes – to the expansion of the research program). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;(2):18–42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-18-42

17. Khoruzhy L.I., Khoruzhy V.I., Kubrushko P.E., Karataeva O.G., Bitkova L.A. Comparative analysis of human capital management strategies in the context of digitalization of the national economy. Frontiers in Sociology. 2023;8:1114301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1114301

18. Bogachov S.V., Vishnevsky V.P., Gurnak A.V., Nekliudova V.D. Modern tax trends and economic growth in a turbulent world: Insights from developed and developing economies. Journal of Tax Reform. 2024;10(1):63–83. https://doi/org/10.15826/jtr.2024.10.1.157

19. Бобылев С.Н., Григорьев Л.М. Цели устойчивого развития ООН и Россия: доклад о человеческом развитии в Российской Федерации. М.: Аналитический центр при Правительстве Российской Федерации; 2016. 215 с.

20. Tkachenko A.A. Ensuring a decent standard of living for the population: opportunities and reality. Economics, Taxes & Law. 2025;18(3):6–18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-3-6-18

21. Chai C.G., da Costa F.C. Strengthening the BRICS anti-corruption framework through technology and international cooperation. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2023;19(4):18–29. https://doi.org/10.61205/jzsp.2023.046

22. Kuznetsov A. V. The US Dollar as a prerequisite for the crisis potential of the global monetary and financial system. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(6):164–174. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-6-164-174