The carbon factor in the strategic development of the metallurgical industry: industry-specific constraints and new opportunities

Over the past decade, climate policy in general and decarbonization processes in particular have become the subject of intense scholarly debate. Alongside studies substantiating the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, there is a growing body of research that views the climate agenda as a form of geoeconomic pressure. Regardless of these differing perspectives, the carbon factor significantly affects industrial operating conditions through changes in cost structures and technological priorities, as well as through new conditions governing international trade. Its impact is particularly pronounced in the metallurgical industry, which is among the most energy-intensive industries and has a substantial carbon footprint. At the same time, metallurgy plays an important role in Russia’s export structure, making it necessary to assess the long-term implications of decarbonization for the industry. The objective of this study is to substantiate a strategic interpretation of the carbon footprint at the industry level and to identify its role in defining the long-term development priorities of the metallurgical industry. The study is methodologically grounded in V.L. Kvint’s concept of strategizing, which provides a framework for structuring industry development around fundamental values and strategic interests while taking into account factors in the external environment. The carbon intensity of metallurgical production should be treated as a measurable industry-level indicator that enables changes in the external environment to be reflected in investment and technology-related decisions. 
The practical implications of this research pertain to its utility in formulating and iteratively adjusting industry and corporate development strategies within the metallurgical industry and other industries, including the energy, oil and gas, transport, and chemical industries. Furthermore, the proposed analytical framework informs decisions on technological modernization and supports the development of circular production models.

1. Fadeev A.M., Ilyinskiy A.A., Afanasiev M.V. Decarbonization of the oil and gas complex in the Arctic: a conscious necessity or a scientific myth? Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2025;18(2):297–306. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2025-2-1441

2. Ovchinnikov K.N. The carbon footprint of the metallurgical industry and an overview of solutions for its decarbonization in China, the USA and Germany. Nedropol’zovanie ХХI vek. 2022;(5(97)):97–107. (In Russ.)

3. Samarina V.P., Sklyarova E.A., Zhilinkova A.P. Prospects for the development of Russian metallurgy in the context of new economic challenges of geopolitical genesis. Fundamental Research. 2023;(3):17–22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/fr.43437

4. Manaeva I.V., Rastopchina Yu.L., Kovaleva E.I. Effectiveness of ESG-principles in the corporate sector of economics. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023;16(4):442–455. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-4-1196

5. Nevolin A.E., Cherepovitsyn A.E., Solovyova V.M. To the issue of transformation of the strategic planning system in the mining and metallurgical industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2025;18(2):199–212. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2025-2-1379

6. Sasaev N. Analysis of the strategic approach to industrial development in Russia. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2023;3(3):348–362. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2023-3-3-348-362

7. Квинт В.Л. Концепция стратегирования. Кемерово: КемГУ; 2022. Т. 1. 132 с.

8. Porter M.E. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press; 1980. 396 p.

9. North D.C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 152 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

10. Stern N.The Economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. 692 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434

11. Johnson G., Whittington R., Scholes K. Exploring strategy: Text and cases. 11th ed. London: Pearson; 2017. 828 p.

12. Nordhaus W. Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review. 2015;105(4):1339–1370. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001

13. Mehling M., van Asselt H., Das K., Droege S., Verkuijl C. Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law. 2019;113(3):433–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.27

14. Grinev S.A., Kvint V.L. Formation of strategic priorities of industrial development of the Russian Federation as an innovative factor in overcoming crisis periods. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023;16(3):275–283. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-3-275-283

15. Novikova I.V., Xie K. Comparative analysis of strategies of Chinese companies in the digital economy. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2022;15(2):226–233. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-2-226-233

16. Kvint V.L. Strategy for the global market: Theory and practical applications. London NY: Global Market; 2016. 456 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739526

17. Hertwich E.G., Peters G.P. Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environmental Science and Technology. 2009;43(16):6414–6420. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803496a

18. Matthews H.S., Hendrickson C.T., Weber C.L. The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environmental Science and Technology. 2008;42(16):5839–5842. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703110w

19. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Completing the picture: How the circular economy tackles climate change: report. Cowes: 2019. Режим доступа: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/Uploads/Completing-the-Picture-How-the-circulareconomy-tackles-climate-change.pdf (дата обращения: 09.12.2025).

20. Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2017;127:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

21. Lacey P., Long J., Spindler W. The Circulat Economy. Hanbook Realizing the Circular Advantage. Springer Nature; 2019. 350 p.

22. Kharitonova N.A., Kharitonova E.N., Pulyaeva V.N. Carbon footprint of Russia: realities and prospects of economic development. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2021;14(1):50–62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2021-1-50-62

23. Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N.M.P., Hultink E.J. The Circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;143:757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

24. Govoruhin V., Kuchina E. Sustainable development of the metallurgical industry in the context ESG transformations. Bulletin of SUSU. Series “Economics and Management”. 2023;17(2):92–100. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14529/em230207

25. Yudin D.A., Ovchinnikov A.M. Cooperation between Russia and China in the field of fuel and energy. China’s state policy in the field of hydrogen energy. Innovation and Investment. 2023;(4):46–50. (In Russ.)