Methodological approaches to developing ESG ratings for public sector entities in the Russian Federation

Sustainable development of the Russian economy, in line with national strategic priorities, requires a governance system that balances long-term economic efficiency, environmental responsibility, and social performance. Public sector entities are directly involved in implementing national projects, government programs, and the Sustainable Development Goals. Assessing their performance is essential to determining the public sector’s actual contribution to sustainable development, identifying challenges and opportunities for improvement, and providing feedback on the exercise of public mandates. ESG ratings can provide a basis for organizational change within public sector entities and, consequently, for broader economic, social, and environmental transformation. However, existing international and Russian ESG ratings primarily target large commercial companies, leaving public authorities, local self-government bodies, and government, budgetary, and autonomous institutions largely outside the scope of ESG assessment. Closing this gap is necessary to integrate the public sector into the national ESG transition. Accordingly, this article proposes methodological approaches to developing ESG ratings for public sector entities in the Russian Federation, taking into account their organizational and legal characteristics and the limited applicability of existing commercial-sector methodologies. The approaches employed by five leading international and four Russian rating agencies were examined. The analysis demonstrates that existing ESG rating methodologies are poorly suited to public sector entities. The resulting methodology comprises a classification of rating participants by area of activity; a system of indicators covering the environmental, social, and governance pillars; a mechanism for incorporating risk management into the assessment; and a scale for interpreting results from low to high. An additional adjustment factor rewards advanced ESG initiatives. The proposed methodology closes a gap in assessing the public sector’s contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals, improves transparency, and enables comparisons across regions, municipalities, and public institutions.

1. Sheveleva G.I. Corporate governance in generating companies of the Russian electric power industry in the context of ESG agenda. Global Energy Interconnection. 2022;(5):512–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloei.2022.10.005

2. Fedchenko E.A., Gusarova L.V., Uskenbayeva A.R. Green building in the esg agenda for sustainable development of Russia: conditions and trends. Construction Materials and Products. 2024;7(3). https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2024-7-3-9

3. Chernysheva T.K. European approaches to the development of conceptual frameworks for ESG policy. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2024;17(1):136–155. https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.01.08

4. Bhullar S., Joshi M., Sharma Sh., Kaur A., Phan D. Greenwashing and ESG: Bibliometric analysis and future research agenda Pritpal. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2025;93:102846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102846

5. Adardour Z., Ed-Dafali S., Sbai H., Hussainey Kh. ESG performance, family ownership, and corporate risk‐taking: The moderating Role of the CSR Committee. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 2025;31(2):1979–1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70026

6. Bhat A.A., Mir A.A., Allie A.H., Lone M.A., Al-Adwan A.S., Jamali D., Riyaz I. Unlocking corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: Mediating role of green strategy, innovation, and leadership. Innovation and Green Development. 2024;3:100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100112

7. Bosi M.K., Lajuni N., Wellfren A.C., Lim T.S. Sustainability reporting through environmental, social, and governance: A bibliometric review. Sustainability. 2022;14(19):12071. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912071

8. Erin O., Ackers B., Bamigboye O. The state of SDGs and sustainability practices of public sector entities: Evidence from under-investigated context. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;465(235):142772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142772

9. Argento D., Grossi G., Persson K., Vingren Th. Sustainability disclosures of hybrid organizations: Swedish state-owned enterprises. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2019;27(4):505–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2018-0362

10. Mansi M., Pandey R., Ghauri Eh. CSR focus in the mission and vision statements of public sector enterprises: evidence from India. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2017;32(45):356–377. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2016-1307/

11. Zheng H., Zhang Y. Do SOEs outperform private enterprises in CSR? Evidence from China. Chinese Management Studies. 2016;10(3):435–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-10-2015-0225

12. Belousov A.L. Legal and organizational aspects of introducing ESG-standards in the Russian banking sector. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2022;16(3):577–586. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.3.577-586

13. Krinichansky K.V., Rubtsov B.B. Financial sector regulation on the agenda of economic Policy reforms. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(5):6–21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-5-6-21

14. Advocatova A.S., Zavorykin A.A. ESG agenda and aggressive tax planning. Economics, Taxes & Law. 2023;16(3):144–152. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-3-144-152

15. Ed-Dafali S., Patel M., Adardour Z., Theodoraki Ch. Mapping ESG-Driven sustainable development: A retrospective review and future research agenda. Innovation and Green Development. 2026;5(1):100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2026.100326

16. Yu Y., Chan H.-L., Cho E. Enhancing ESG performance through digital transformation: Recent development, cases and relationships. Journal of Business Research. 2026;202:115763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115763

17. Tong X., Lyu X., Jin J., Bian H. ESG ratings and stock price crash risk: Role of herding behavior and network media attention. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2026;97:103114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2026.103114

18. Fedorova E., Salnikova P. Impact of environmental initiative disclosures on share prices of Russian public companies. HSE Economic Journal. 2024;28(2):223–247. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2024-28-2-223-247

19. Huang Sh., Ge J. Is there heterogeneity in ESG disclosure by mining companies? A comparison of developed and developing countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2024;104:107348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107348

20. Fikru M.G., Brodmann J., Eng L.L., Grant J.A. ESG ratings in the mining industry: Factors and implications. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2024;20:101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101521

21. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick E., Bennett S., Lehnherr R., Zhong A. ESG rating disagreement: Implications and aggregation approaches. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2024;96(6(Part A)):103532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103532

22. Chen J., Lin H. Corporate digitalization and ESG rating divergence: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance. 2026;82:103264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103264

23. Yang H. The role of common ownership in shaping ESG rating uncertainty: A collaborative governance perspective across time horizons. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025;102:104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104083

24. Zhang J., Qi F., Wu M. Market-oriented environmental regulation and ESG rating divergence. Research in International Business and Finance, 2025;79:103074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103074

25. Bataeva B.S., Karpov N.A.Transparency of information disclosure by Russian companies with state participation: the impact of the composition and structure of the board of directors. Lomonosov Economics Journal 2025;60(1):129–150. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-1-7

26. Liu X., Peng Y., Li Q., Wu Ch.-H. CEO pay structure and ESG rating disagreement. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025;102:104101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104101

27. Pavlova A.S. The problems of ESG-rating of economic entities in the public sector. Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions. 2025;9:107–122. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17308/meps/2078-9017/2025/9/107-122

28. Grishankova S.D. ESG ratings. In: Collection of articles of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) "ESG transformation as a vector of sustainable development". In 3 volumes. Ed. by K.E. Turbina and I.Yu. Yurgens. Moscow: Aspect-Press; 2022. Pp. 305–444. (In Russ.)