Preview

Russian Journal of Industrial Economics

Advanced search

INCENTIVES TO REDUCE THE COST OF PRODUCTION IN METALLURGICAL ENTERPRISES

https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2014-3-90-93

Abstract

The problem investigated by authors is connected with the necessity to ensure the competitiveness of domestic metallurgical enterprises production under conditions of the growing prices for raw materials, materials and energy carriers The problem to decrease product cost becomes very acute. The article presents results of approaches aimed at the personnel’s stimulation for economy of resources. The authors proposes the system to manage personnel’s motivation in reducing product costs. The authors believe that the personnel is not sufficiently interested in rational use of resources. Accordingly it decreases the effectiveness of introduced measures directed on economy of resources. In this regard the traditional approach presuming that the labor productivity rates have to exceed the salary growth rates is criticized. As a criterion of restriction of the money allocated for labor payment, the authors suggest to use a ratio of labor productivity growth rates calculated as the ratio between added value and personnel number. Different stages are listed how to calculate the money allocated for labor payment and financing of other expenses for the personnel. Introduction of the offered approaches will allow to increase motivation of the personnel to rationally use the resources.

About the Authors

V. N. Dorman
Ural Federal University behalf the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620002, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Russian Federation

Candidate of economic sciences, associate Professor



B. S. Medvezhov
Ural Federal University behalf the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620002, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Russian Federation

Candidate of economic sciences, associate Professor



References

1. Пыжьянов В. Революция машин // Эксперт-Урал. 2013. № 27 (563). С. 2–4.

2. Доклад Всемирного банка об экономике России (ноябрь 2013 г.). URL: http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/eca/RER29-RUS (дата обращения: 30.12.2013).

3. Мониторинг социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации (ноябрь 2013 г.) // Бюджетная система Российской Федерации. URL: http://www.budgetrf.ru/Publications/mert_new/MERT_NEW_index.htm (дата обращения: 27.01.2014).

4. Годовой отчет ОАО «Магнитогорский металлургический комбинат» за 2012 г. URL: http://mmk.ru/annualreport/2012/index.html#/24/ (дата обращения: 27.01.2014).

5. Синк Д.С. Управление производительностью: планирование, измерение и оценка, контроль и повышение. М.: Прогресс, 1989. 605 с.

6. Экономика предприятия / под ред. В.Я. Горфинкеля, В.А. Швандара. 2-е изд. М.: Банки и биржи, 1998. 742 с.

7. Дорман В.Н., Близнюк Т.С., Жемчуева М.А. Теория и практика определения доли постоянных затрат для внедрения управленческого учета по местам возникновения // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. 2007. № 22. С. 15–21.


Review

For citations:


Dorman V.N., Medvezhov B.S. INCENTIVES TO REDUCE THE COST OF PRODUCTION IN METALLURGICAL ENTERPRISES. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2014;(3):90-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2014-3-90-93

Views: 820


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-1633 (Print)
ISSN 2413-662X (Online)