Adjoining Rights and Innovation Economy
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2016-2-148-152
Abstract
It is incorrect to relate the performance to the results of intellectual activity. The performance is defined as the reproduction, the copying and not the creation of something new. It is impossible to relate the performance to the intellectual property in any sphere of the human activity: science, sports, art. To the creative activity of any citizen, not just artist refer: creation of work, discovery, development of a method or device, rationalization offer and so on, but not the employment of a strange result through making it public. The precedent of an artist’s performance protection stimulates to introduce the protection of performance of other kinds of human activity: the performance of workers, engineers, scientists, office workers, entrepreneurs and so on when collaboration in implementation of inventions or rationalization offers, taking into consideration that this activity requires substantial expenses. The existing institute of intellectual property (Citizens’ Codex of the Russian Federation, Part 4) lacks unfortunately mentioning rights adjoining to patent rights. The legislator, when protecting the show business, hat thus totally “forgotten” the innovative economy namely the protection of relative rights including the reward. I support the opinion that objects of relative right has to be expanded in order to protect the innovation economy.
About the Author
V. N. Shtennikov
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate Technical Sciences, Associate Professor,
19 ul. Mira, Ekaterinburg 620002
References
1. Andreeva A.A., Mansurov Yu.N., Mansurov S.Yu., Miklushevskiy D.V. Innovation process management in industrial enterprises. Ekonomika v promyshlennosti = Economy in the industry. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 30–38. DOI:10.17073/2072-1633-2015-2-30-38 (In Russ).
2. Shtennikov V.N. Compulsory licensing: the compromise of interests. Ekonomika v promyshlennosti = Economy in the industry. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 71–76. DOI:10.17073/2072-1633-2015-4-71-76 (In Russ).
3. Grisenko K.Yu., Alekseeva N.V. Analysis of innovation in Russian industry problems. Sb. nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Klasternye initsiativy v formirovanii progressivnoi struktury natsional’noi ekonomiki». 2015. Pp. 120–124. (In Russ).
4. Ivlev A.F., Zasenko V.E., Rusetskaya D.D., Demidova E.N. Some aspects of the development of innovations in Russia. Zhurnal pravovykh i ekonomicheskikh issledovanii. 2015. No. 1. Pp. 79–85. (In Russ).
5. Kudryavtseva S.S., Shinkevich A.I., Ganeeva G.A. Simulation of non-cash payments in the economic systems in the organization of the production of technological innovation. Simulation of non-cash payments in the economic systems in the organization of the production of technological innovation Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Herald of Kazan Technological University. 2015. Vol. 18. No. 5. Pp. 189–193. (In Russ).
6. Ovchinnikova T.I., Anisimov Yu.P., Kobeleva S.V. Industrial innovation and growth of enterprises. Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2015. No. 1 (28). Pp. 149–156 (In Russ).
7. Makeev N.A., Zonov V.L. Administrative aspects of innovation in enterprises in the long term strategic development. Sb. statei i tezisov dokladov XI mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov «Sovremennoe obshchestvo: nauchnyi vzglyad molodykh». 2015. Pp. 103–108. (In Russ).
8. Khorshikyan S.V. Innovation and innovation transfer problems. Vek kachestva. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 46–47. (In Russ).
9. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow: OOO «A TEMP», 2006. 944 p. (In Russ).
10. Shalennaya E. The concept and functions of neighboring rights of broadcasting organizations Available at: http://www.medialaw.ru/publications/zip/111/7.htm (accessed: 10.02.2013). (In Russ).
11. Shtennikov V.N., Belyaeva I.A., Shtennikov I.V., Zyablova A.Yu. They are the «execution» of intellectual property? Birzha intellektual’noi sobstvennosti. 2008. Vol. VII. No. 6. Pp. 9–10. (In Russ).
12. Ptushenko A.V. Flaws of AP law. Pt 2. Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. 2002. No. 11. Pp. 37–48. (In Russ).
13. Podshibikhin L. Prospects of improving legal protection of certain intellectual property in Russia. Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. 2010. No. 3. Pp. 4–11. (In Russ).
14. Al’tshuller G.S. Algoritm izobreteniya [The algorithm of the invention]. Moscow: Moskovskii rabochii, 1973. 296 p. (In Russ).
15. Shtennikov V.N. Problems of application of the «Anti-plagiarism» system. Tekhnologiya mashinostroeniya. 2015. No. 5. Pp. 54–57. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Shtennikov V.N. Adjoining Rights and Innovation Economy. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2016;(2):148-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2016-2-148-152
Views:
716
Email this article 