Preview

Russian Journal of Industrial Economics

Advanced search

A Comparison of the Existing OrganizationalEconomic Mechanism of Regional Clusters’ Creation and Development in Russia and Abroad with the Mechanism of the “Roadmap” of Cooperation (on the example of the simulated situation in machine-building cluster of the Chelyabinsk Region)

https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2016-2-161-172

Abstract

Cooperative associations present a rather efficient mechanism of problem solving, at the same time the retarded process of their creation bears risks for the participants. The reduced effectiveness or gap between reached and planned level of indicators is due to poorly developed mechanism for establishment and development of cooperative associations. The reliability and productivity of cooperative association are largely dependent on accurately calculated directions of development and interaction between the participants. Objectives: to present a comparative description between existing mechanisms of cooperation in Russia and abroad and the mechanism of cooperation “Road map” of cooperation, showing the possibility of the alternative approach. The article presents the approximate results of the calculation of the “Management part” of the “Road map” by means of economic-mathematical models, allowing to make preanalysis of the prospects of cooperative association. The results of the cooperative association’s analysis by means of the “Roadmap” are interesting both for participants and for external observers, such for example, as future investors. The analysis demonstrates: the stability of cooperation by identifying “safety cushions”; the possibility to cover additional costs through the “margin” from the growth of the conjugate productivity of cooperation, the possibility to create “reserve cooperation”. The analysis shows the sources of additional profit; it demonstrates the long-term functioning of cooperation; it helps to attract investors and other participants; it discloses the missing and overlapping participants; it provides the priorities for obtaining state support; it defines the maximum potential of cooperation.

About the Author

I. V. Morozkina
Institute of Management and Marketing of the The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation

Post Graduate Student,

82-1 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow 119571



References

1. Samostrokova E.S. Classification companies cluster. Molodoi uchenyi. 2012. Vol. 1. No. 1 (36). Pp. 141–143. (In Russ).

2. Kurganskaya M. Morton postroit v “Novoi Moskve» IT- i farmatsevticheskie klastery / Proekt – “Bol’shaya Moskva» [Morton will build in “New Moscow” IT-clusters and pharmaceutical / Project – “Big Moscow”]. (pervoistochnik – setevoe izdanie m24.ru) Available at: http://moscowbig.ru/news/morton_postroit_v_novoj_moskve_it_i_farmacevticheskij_klastery/2014-03-25-1510 (accessed: 03.07.2015). (In Russ).

3. Shmeleva E. Cluster – is not a panacea. «Rossiiskaya Biznes-gazeta». 04.12.2012. No. 875. Available at: http://www.rg.ru/2012/12/04/klasteri.html (accessed: 06.07.2015). (In Russ).

4. Tourist cluster in the North Caucasus will receive tax benefits. Informatsionnyi ekonomicheskii portal Ekonomika sovremennogo predpriyatiya Available at: http://www.esp-izdat.ru/?article=4709 (accessed: 08.07.2015). (In Russ).

5. The Government of the Russian Federation suggested to improve the efficiency of local clusters. 2015 / CNews. Available at: http://corp.cnews.ru/news/line/index.shtml?2015/06/19/596746 (accessed: 10.07.2015)

6. Isaksen A., Hauge E. Regional clusters in Europe. Observatory of European SMEs. Belgium: European Communities, 2002. No. 3. Pp. 47–49.

7. The Industrial Complex Cluster Program of Korea. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, KICOX. P. 22–23. Available at: http://www.clustercollaboration.eu/documents/270945/0/THE_INDUSTRIAL_COMPLEX_CLUSTER_PROGRAM_OF_KOREA.pdf (accessed: 12.07.2015)

8. Proceedings of the Chelyabinsk Region Government Available at: http://pravmin74.ru/ (accessed: 15.07.2015)

9. Porter M.E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press, 1990. Pp. 70–90 (855 p.).

10. Taylor F.W. The principles of scientific management Available at: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/taylor/principles/index.htm (accessed: 11.07.2015)

11. Ketels C., Solvell O. Clusters in the EU 10 new member countries, 2005. P. 1–24 / EUROPE INNOVA (Cluster Mapping). Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEXPCOMNET/Resources/Ketels_and_Solvell_2005_EU.pdf (accessed: 15.07.2015).

12. Ukolov V.F., Kukushkin M.A., Bogatyreva T.G. Klasternaya model’ vzaimodeistviya vlasti, biznesa i obshchestva [Cluster model of interaction between the government, business and society]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2009. Pp. 5–17.

13. Zhdanova O. Clusters in the industrial policy of the Russian Feseration subjects. Federalizm. 2008. No. 3. P. 222. (In Russ).

14. Kanter R.M. Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review. 1994. Vol. 72. No. 4. Pp. 96–108.

15. Schibany A., Hämäläinen T. J., Schienstock G. Interfirm Cooperation and Networking: Concepts, Evidence and Policy. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2100807.pdf (accessed: 17.07.2015).


Review

For citations:


Morozkina I.V. A Comparison of the Existing OrganizationalEconomic Mechanism of Regional Clusters’ Creation and Development in Russia and Abroad with the Mechanism of the “Roadmap” of Cooperation (on the example of the simulated situation in machine-building cluster of the Chelyabinsk Region). Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2016;(2):161-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2016-2-161-172

Views: 719


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-1633 (Print)
ISSN 2413-662X (Online)