The mechanism of variants of ecosystem conservation options taking into accounting regional and technological features of mining enterprises
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-3-273-279
Abstract
At the moment, inRussia, entering the next stage of economic development, which is based primarily on the use of natural resources, a new environmental policy must be developed, an integral part of which is the protection of nature, natural ecosystems and their basis – biodiversity. Based on the Convention on Biological Diversity, a number of measures have been proposed within the framework of the National Biodiversity Strategy inRussia, with the help of which the whole process of conservation of natural ecosystems in the country should be carried out. Unfortunately, up to now the proposed measures are practically not applied in practice, and first of all it concerns the economic levers of biodiversity conservation. So the economic regulation of the protection and use of wildlife, among other things, includes: accounting and economic valuation of objects of the animal kingdom; an economically justified system of payments for the use of wildlife; budget financing of measures to protect and reproduce natural ecosystems; economically justified system of fines and claims for violation of the legislation of the Russian Federation. At the same time, economic incentives for the protection, reproduction and sustainable use of wildlife include: the establishment of tax and other benefits granted to legal entities and citizens that ensure the protection, reproduction and sustainable use of wildlife, as well as the protection and improvement of their habitat. Based on this, it can be said that the purpose of these activities is to improve the environmental management process in industrial regions based on the development of an economic regulatory mechanism and an environmental and economic assessment of conservation of biological diversity as the basis for the existence of natural ecosystems.
About the Authors
A. V. Myaskov
National University of Science and Technology «MISiS»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr . Sci . (Econ .), Professor, Director of Mining Institute NUST MISiS
4 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049
A. S. Tulupov
Management Market Economy Institute RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr . Sci . (Econ .), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Economic Regulation of Ecologically Sustainable
47 Nakhimovskiy prospekt, Moscow 117418
O. V. Zhironkina
Kemerovo Institute (branch) of the PRUE
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand . Sci . (Ped .), Associate Professor
39 Kuznetsky Prospekt, Kemerovo 650992
V. S. Zaitsev
National University of Science and Technology «MISiS»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Graduate Student
4 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049
References
1. Chasovnikov S.N. Conceptual basis for taking into account the ecological capacity of the territory in the implementation of regional environmental and economic regulation. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental research. 2016. No. 12-4. Pp. 918–923.
2. Martinab C.J. The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics. 2016. Vol. 121. Pp. 149– 159.
3. De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumansb R.M.J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics. 2002. Vol. 41. No. 3. Pp. 393–408.
4. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 1997. Vol. 387. No. 6630. Pp. 253–260.
5. Gusev A.A., Martynov A.S., Motkin G.A., Ryumina E.V., Tishkov A.A., Artyukhov V.G., Vinogradov V.V., Gorsky V.G., Gritsenko A.A., Gurman V.I., Karachevtsev I.L., Kopylova A.A., Morozova O.V., Raver E.A., Tulupov A.S., Fidirko A.A., Tsarevskaya N.G., Shvetsova-Shilovskaya T.N. Novye finansovye mekhanizmy sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya. K itogam Proekta GEF «Sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya» v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [New financial mechanisms for biodiversity conservation. To the results of the GEF Project «Biodiversity Conservation» in the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Nauchnoissledovatel’skii tsentr «Ekoproekt», 2002. 204 p.
6. Tolikov V.N. Modeling of state policy in the field of nature management. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic sciences. 2008. No. 38. Pp. 118–121.
7. Ashford N.A., Ralph P.H. Achieving Global Climate and Environmental Goals by Governmental Regulatory Targeting. Ecological Economics. 2018. Vol. 152. Pp. 246–259.
8. Glazyrina I.P., Faleichik L.M. K voprosu ob ekonomicheskikh mekhanizmakh sokhraneniya ekologicheskikh funktsii lesnykh ekosistem [On the issue of economic mechanisms for the conservation of ecological functions of forest ecosystems]. Ekologiya. Ekonomika. Informatika. Materialy Vserossiiskoi ob»edinennoi konferentsii. Rostov-onDon: Yuzhnyi federal’nyi universitet, 2014. Pp. 285–289.
9. Engoyan O.Z., Stetsenko A.V. Assessment of the state of socio-ecological and economic processes, taking into account the territorial specifics (on the example of the mountainous region). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya = Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 3: The Economy. Ecology. 2018. Vol. 20. No. 1. Pp. 136–145.
10. Tilman D., Wedin D., Knops J. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature. 1996. Vol. 379. No. 6567. Pp. 718–720.
11. Lukyanova N.V., Myaskov A.V. Rationale for the need to take into account landscape features in the restoration of natural ecosystems in mining regions. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten’ (nauchno-tekhnicheskii zhurnal) = Mining information and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2013. No. 7. Pp. 312–316.
12. Brinza V.V. Razvitie nauki v oblasti ekonomiki prirodopol’zovaniya i upravleniya predpriyatiyami gornodobyvayushchei i metallurgicheskoi promyshlennosti Rossii [Development of science in the field of economics of nature management and management of enterprises of the mining and metallurgical industry in Russia]. Moscow: Publishing House MISiS, 2017. 402 p.
13. Boerema A., Passel S.V., Meire P. CostEffectiveness Analysis of Ecosystem Management with Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice. Ecological Economics. 2018. Vol. 152. Pp. 207–218.
14. Myaskov A.V., Popov S.M. Formation of an ecological and economic algorithm for the prevention of environmental crises originating as a result of climate change of the earth. Economics and innovation management. 2018. No. 1(4). Pp. 16–25.
15. Tulupov A.S. Identification of damage on the basis of emergent representations. Regional problems of transformation the economy. 2013. No. 1(35). Pp. 409–424.
16. Myaskov A., Gonchar A. Ecological and economic prerequisites for the extraction of solid minerals from the bottom of the arctic seas. E3S Web of Conferences The Second International Innovative Mining Symposium. 2017. Article Number 01026. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20172101026
17. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., Chapin F.S., Coe M.T., Daily G.C., Gibbs H.K., Helkowski J.H., Holloway T., Howard E.A., Kucharik C.J., Monfreda C., Patz J.A., Prentice I.C., Ramankutty N., Snyder P.K. Global consequences of land use. Science. 2005. Vol. 309. No. 5734. Pp. 570– 574. DOI: 10.1126/science.1111772
18. Myaskov A.V. Methodological bases of the ecological and economic justification for the conservation of natural ecosystems in mining regions. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten’ (nauchnotekhnicheskii zhurnal) = Mining information and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2011. No. 1. Pp. 399–401.
19. Myaskov A.V., Biryulina E.Yu. Ecological and economic monitoring of biodiversity. Gornyi informatsionnoanaliticheskii byulleten’ (nauchno-tekhnicheskii zhurnal) = Mining information and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2010. No. 7. Pp. 237–240.
20. Nemova V.I. Economic mechanism of payment for ecosystem services of forests in foreign countries. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta lesnogo khozyaistva = Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Forestry. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 41–54.
Review
For citations:
Myaskov A.V., Tulupov A.S., Zhironkina O.V., Zaitsev V.S. The mechanism of variants of ecosystem conservation options taking into accounting regional and technological features of mining enterprises. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2018;11(3):273-279. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-3-273-279
Views:
700
Email this article 