Formation of intellectual property in the coal industry
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-4-353-358
Abstract
The interest of Russian and foreign investors in the coal industry is great enough. In the Russian coal industry, it is necessary to invest mainly those investments that relate to highly innovative technologies and promote the introduction of innovative projects in the field of geological exploration, coal mining and processing. First of all, it concerns coal engineering, certain areas in the areas of coal processing and processing, innovative activity of the organization, complex of security measures and organization of coal mining.
It should be noted that with a common similarity in the direction of creative activity of domestic and foreign inventors vary considerably. Abroad, most of the patents apply to the construction of mining equipment with the simultaneous patenting of ways to use this design. In Russia, most of the patents protect the development methods intended for use in specific conditions of a certain deposit, as well as the methods of using certain equipment in different conditions.
The analysis of innovative activity of organizations of Russia in comparison with the EU countries was carried out, which showed that the share of organizations that carry out innovations: technological, marketing and organizational is much lower than in Western Europe. Basically, the patents received in Russia relating to the coal industry are aimed at underground methods of coal mining. The creative activity of domestic inventors is mainly aimed at improving the ways of using existing equipment.
Private companies (for coal mining and processing) without state involvement will not be able to modernize existing technologies and equipment in a short time. In this regard, the financing of innovative projects in the coal sector should be carried out within the framework of the public-private partnership for the implementation of large innovative projects of the coal business. Patents provide an opportunity to learn about current research and existing technology stocks of companies in various countries long before the advent of innovative products on the market and to avoid the risk of authors of development for obtaining a patent.
About the Author
D. Yu. Savon
National Research Technological University «MISiS»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor,
4 Leninsky Prospect, Moscow 119049
References
1. Zholobova Yu.S., Safronov A.E., Kushchiy N.A., Savon D.Yu. Minimizing the impact on the environment in the application of new technologies for coal enrichment and utilization of production wastes. Mining Journal. 2016. No. 5. Pp. 109–112. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.05.18
2. Peshkova M.Kh., Savon D.Yu. The mechanism of public-private partnership in the environmental and economic assessment of technogenic mineral objects. Mining Journal. 2016. No. 10. Pp. 37–41. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.10.07
3. Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik. Statisticheskii sbornik 2018 [Russian Statistical Yearbook. Statistical compilation 2018]. Moscow: Rosstat, 2018. 522 p. (In Russ.)
4. Rossiya i strany – chleny Evropeiskogo soyuza. Statisticheskii sbornik 2017 [Russia and the countries – members of the European Union. Statistical compilation 2018]. Moscow: Rosstat, 2017. 264 р. (In Russ.)
5. Kuzubov S.A. Limitations of Intellectual Property Rights and Patent Risk. Ekonomika i menedzhment innovatsionnykh tekhnologii = Economics and innovations management. 2014. No. 10. Available at: http://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2014/10/6142 (accessed: 20.02.2018). (In Russ.).
6. Tulupov A.S. Compensation of environmental damage in the economy of mining production. Mining Journal. 2017. No. 8. Pp. 61–65. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.08.21
7. Zhaglovskaya A., Savon D., Safronov A., Sidorova E. Production activity analysis Methodology for open pit coal mines (in terms of Shestaki open pit mine). Eurasian mining. 2017. No. 1(27). Pp. 14–16. DOI: 10.17580/em.2017.01.04
8. Yakimakho A.P. Upravlenie ob»ektami intellektual’noi sobstvennosti v Respublike Belarus’. [Management of intellectual property in the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk: Amalfeo, 2014. 472 p. (In Russ.)
9. Samarina V., Skufina T., Samarin A., Baranov S. Some System Problems of Mining Enterprises of Ferrous Metallurgy. International Review of Management and Marketing. Special Issue for Socio-Economic and HumanityPhilosophical Problems of Modern Sciences. 2016. Vol. 6. No. S1. Pp. 90–94.
10. Samarina V.P., Skufina T.P., Samarin A.V., Baranov S.V. Some Problems of Anti-recessionary Public Management in Russia at Present. Management of Systems of Socio-Economic and Legal Relations in Modern Conditions of Development of Education and Society. 2016. Vol. 6. No. 6S. Pp. 38–44. Available at: http://econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/2917 (accessed: 20.02.2018).
11. Vasilyeva Т.V. On the observance of copyright in the era of high technology development. Sovremennoe pravo = Modern law. 2011. No. 12. Pp. 21–28. (In Russ.)
12. Mirskih I.Yu. Protection of Intellectual Property in the Conditions of Globalization. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta = Perm University Herald. 2012. No. 3. Pp. 138– 144. (In Russ.)
13. Somaya D. Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management Journal. 2003. Vol. 24. No. 1. Pp. 17–38. DOI: 10.1002/smj.281
14. Gilbert R., Shapiro C. Optimal Patent Length and Breadth. The RAND Journal of Economics. 1990. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pp. 106–112. DOI: 10.2307/2555497
15. Klemperer P. How Broad should be the Scope of Patent Protection Be? The RAND Journal of Economics. 1990. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pp. 113–130. DOI: 10.2307/2555498
16. Gallini N.T. Patent Policy and Costly Imitation. The RAND Journal of Economics. 1992. Vol. 23. No. 1. Pp. 53–63. DOI: 10.2307/2555432
17. Kamien M.I., Schwartz N.L. On the degree of rivalry for the maximum innovative activity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1976. Vol. 90. No. 2. Pp. 245–260. DOI: 10.2307/1884629
18. Denicolò V. The optimum life of a patent when the timing of innovation is stochastic. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1999. Vol. 17. No. 6. Pp. 827– 846. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00061-1
19. Gavrilov E.P. Patents for inventions in the countries of the Customs Union in the aspect of private international law. Patenty i litsenzii = Patents and licenses. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 22–28. (In Russ.)
20. Churin N.F. Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’ v strukture mirovoi ekonomiki [Intellectual Property in the Structure of the World Economy]. Moscow: Ekonomist, 2014. 71 p. (In Russ.)
21. Russell D. Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’ [Intellectual property]. Moscow: Kniga po Trebovaniyu, 2013. 471 р. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Savon D.Yu. Formation of intellectual property in the coal industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2018;11(4):353-358. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-4-353-358
Views:
848
Email this article 