Prospects for development of mining monoprofile municipal entities of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-2-206-213
Abstract
The article is devoted to the development of measures for complex support of monoprofile municipal entities. These measures have aimes to improve their socio-economic situation. The topicality of the study is that in many mining monoprofile municipal entities (MME) there are socio-economic problems the solution of which affects the life quality of their 1.26 million residents and the performance of 41 out of 58 mines of the country. The authors used decomposition of city-forming enterprises of MME of the Russian Federation and depending on the type of their economic activity worked out special measures on developing mining MME grouped according to three directions. The article presents the results of analysis of the socio-economic situation in mining MME of the Russian Federation. The analysis was conducted on the basis of the data about the quality indicators of the town environment, the number of residents, average unemployment rate, average number of employees of city-forming enterprises and the number of employees to be dismissed. The authors present the results of financial analysis of the city-forming enterprises involved in underground coal mining. The results of the analysis provided the opportunity to give recommendations on the possible directions for development of mining MME and suggest the measures for improving their socio-economic situation. The measures take into account social, natural-geographical and financial-economic aspects of development of such municipal entities.
About the Authors
M. S. GoncharovRussian Federation
Maxim S. Goncharov – Postgraduate Student
4-1 Leninskiy Ave., Moscow 119049
D. Yu. Savon
Russian Federation
Diana Yu. Savon – Dr.Sci. (Econ.), Professor
4-1 Leninskiy Ave., Moscow 119049
References
1. Ivanov O.B., Buchwald E.M. Russian monotowns: from outsiders to leaders in economic development. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice. 2017;(5):7–21. (In Russ.)
2. Express analysis on certain topical issues of municipal and urban development. Foundation “Institute of City Economics”. 2021. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.urbaneconomics.ru/sites/default/files/ekspress-analiz_po_otdelnym_aktualnym_voprosam_municipalnogo_i_gorodskogo_razvitiya.pdf (accessed on 03.01.2022).
3. Kelchevskaya N.R., Pelymskaya I.S. Corporate social responsibility of industrial enterprises in monocities. Moscow: Pervoe ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo; 2020. 162 p. (In Russ.)
4. Pyatsheva E.N. The functioning features of single-industry towns in Russia. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2019;(2):18–34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2019-2-18-34
5. Burrell G. The role of coal mining towns in social theory: past, present and future. Global Discourse. 2017;7(4):451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1332473
6. Bird D., Taylor A. Disasters and demographic change of ‘Single-Industry’ towns – decline and resilience in Morwell, Australia. In: The Demography of Disasters. Springer; 2020:125–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49920-4_7
7. Popova E.Yu. The role of city-forming enterprises in solving social problems of single-industry towns. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences. 2018;(4):113–118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-4-113-118
8. Zheng C., Yin H. Current development and policies on Russia’s single-industrial cities. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018;8(4):95-102. (In Russ.)
9. Kulay S. Analyzing criteria for classifying municipalities as single-industry (single-industry cities). Society and Power. 2019;3(77):50–62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2019-3-50-62
10. Krutikov V.K., Dorozhkina T.V., Tyutin D.V., Yakunina M.V. Single-industry towns. Kaluga: Politop; 2017. 158 p. (In Russ.)
11. Population of the Russian Federation by municipality. Rosstat. April 25, 2022. (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13282 (accessed on 01.01.2022).
12. The average number of employees of the city-forming organization. EMISS. Federal statistics. The last update December 28, 2021. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/58419 (accessed on 02.01.2022).
13. The level of registered unemployment in single-industry towns (the number of unemployed citizens registered with the employment service, as a percentage of the population of working age). EMISS. Federal statistics. The last update December 28, 2021. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/57943 (accessed on 02.01.2022).
14. The number of employees expected to be dismissed. EMISS. Federal Statistics. The last update December 28, 2021. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/57942# (accessed on 02.01.2022).
15. The urban environment quality index is a tool to assess the quality of a city’s material environment and the conditions in which it is created. (In Russ.). URL: https://xn----dtbcccdtsypabxk.xn--p1ai/#/ (accessed on 03.01.2022).
16. State information resource of accounting (financial) statements. The Federal Tax Service of Russia. (In Russ.). URL: https://bo.nalog.ru/ (accessed on 09.01.2022).
17. Papenov K.V., Nikonorov S.M., Sitkina K.S. (eds). Sustainable urban development. Moscow: Econ. Dep. Lomonosov Moscow St. Univ.; 2019. 288 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Goncharov M.S., Savon D.Yu. Prospects for development of mining monoprofile municipal entities of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2022;15(2):206-213. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-2-206-213