Model of assessment of a company’s manufacturability in quality management

Digital transformation is one of the key areas of change in the areas of social production; assessment of the level of technology implementation is an integral tool for the development of companies. The level of manufacturability of a company is of great importance, quality management is an essential part of an organization’s management system and includes the process of measurement, analysis and improvement of quality indicators. Therefore, the development of a model for assessing the level of manufacturability of quality management is an urgent area of science and practice. Grounding of the criteria and development of the model of assessment of a company’s manufacturability level in quality management are a perspective direction for assessment and working out the path for development of digitalization of a company. The suggested model of assessment of a company’s manufacturability in quality management includes criteria of quality of main factors of a production system (product, production, management). It estimates them from the viewpoint of IT development: regulation, automation, robotization and the fulfilled QMS functions: finding out the quality indicators, monitoring and assessment. Relevant assessment of manufacturability of a company suggests measurement of the results on each direction of the activity and integration of the indicators into overall result. The proposed Assessment Model can contribute to the development of a digital platform for quality management, containing processes and indicators for managing the quality of products, processes and systems. Model will make it possible to make informed management decisions on the development of quality management and will allow avoiding unreasonable costs of digitalization with a low level of development of quality management functions and the absence of documented procedures.

automation, digitalization, quality management, products, processes, model

1. Levchenko E.V. The impact of digitalization on the development of quality management system. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Saratov State Social and Economic University. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 9–14. (In Russ.)

2. Petrenko D.S., Letchford L.N., Alekseeva Yu.B. A quality in digit: an experience in implementation of the branch it-management system. Pt 1. Methods of Quality Management. 2019. No.12. Pp. 20–27. (In Russ.)

3. Petrenko D.S., Letchford L.N., Alekseev Yu.B. A quality in digit: an experience in implementation of the branch it-management system. Pt 2. Methods of Quality Management. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 28–32. (In Russ.)

4. Batov A. Quality management automation: close-up. Standards and Quality. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 76–78. (In Russ.)

5. Sidorin V.V. Quality Management System of an Organization in Digital Economy. Methods of Quality Management. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 28–35. (In Russ.)

6. Turovets O.G., Rodionova V.N., Kablashova I.V. Ensuring the quality of the organization of production processes in the conditions of digital production management. Оrganizer of production. 2018. Vol. 26. No. 4. Pp.65–76. (In Russ.)

7. Voronin E.A., Mishin D.S. Quality assessment of information and observability of processes in the information space of the digital economy, Voprosy teorii bezopasnosti i ustoichivosti sistem = Questions of the theory of security and stability of systems. 2018. No. 20. Pp. 175–184. (In Russ.)

8. Levchenko E.V. Developing a system of quality management for digital companies. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ i kachestvo = Economic security and quality. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 24–28. (In Russ.)

9. Miroshnichenko M.A., Egorov R.A., Morozov D.N. Development of a system of quality criteria and application of technology of universal quality management in the field of legal services. Natural humanitarian studies. 2020. No. 27. Pp. 137–143. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2309- 4788-2020-00025

10. Turovets O.G., Rodionova V.N., Kablashova I.V. Ensuring the quality of the organization of production processes in the conditions of digital production management. Оrganizer of production. 2018. Vol. 26. No. 4. Pp. 65–76. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25987/VSTU.2018.92.21.006

11. Dmitrieva O.V. The strategic analysis of digital solutions implementation in the urban governance. Administrative Consulting. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 121–128. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-3-121-128

12. Bakumenko L.P., Minina E.A. International index of digital economy and society (i-desi): trends in the development of digital technologies. Statistics and Economics. 2020. Vol. 17. No. 2. Pp. 40–54. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2020-2-40-54

13. Gordeeva I.V. Digital transformation as new reality: new technologies and new quality of life. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii = Modern high technologies. 2019. No. 12-2. Pp. 329–334. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17513/ snt.37880

14. Zhukova M.A. Digital technologies and platforms as a tool for digital transformation. Finansovyi Vestnik = Financial bulletin. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 84–88. (In Russ.)

15. Mastercard Digital Evolution Index. Available at: https://newsroom.mas- tercard. com/digital-press-kits/digital-evolutionindex-2017/

16. Tkalich T.A. Evaluation and forecasting of indicators of the digital economy by the ABCanalysis method. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 16–20. (In Russ.)

17. Europe’s Digital Competitiveness Report. European Commission. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010. 197 p.

18. Agca O., Gibson J., Ignatius J., Davies S., Xu O. An Industry 4 readiness assessment tool. Coventry: WMG-The University of Warwick, 2017.

19. Pasieka S., Pasieka A., Bil M., Humeniuk O. Global Trends in the Development of Labour Markets and Employment in the Focus of Innovation Change. The 8th International Conference on Monitoring, Modeling &Management of Emergent Economy (M3E2), 2019. Vol. 65. DOI:10.1051/shsconf/20196507002

20. Milkova M.A., Andreichicov A.V., Andreichicova O.N. Decision – Making under uncertainty: a heuristics overview and the analytic network process. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 730–751. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918- 2019-4-730-751

21. ISO 9001:2015. Quality management systems – Requirements. IDT, 2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html